Documents

Reply Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Thomas

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1985

a ak oe we ails passim Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. $§ 7401 e¢ seq. … A rule imposing such an onerous requirement is precisely the kind of rule for which § 553 of the Administrative Pro- cedure Act requires notice and comment procedure.

Opposition Brief — Mole v. Buckhorn Rubber Products, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

Air, 157 F.3d 744, 748-49 (9th Cir. 1998)); Cooper v. Neiman Marcus Group, 125 F.3d 786, 790 (9th Cir. 1997); Sanders v. … Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cummins v. Pepsi-Cola Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

The District Court ignored the fact that Pepsi was violating the federal Clean Air Act by allowing Arnett to work, yet they held Cummins accountable for not providing Pepsi with information they should … The lower Courts erred in that they failed to recognize that Pepsi was violating the federal Clean Air Act by displacing Cummins from a job for which he was qualified and certified and putting another

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Upsher v. Grosse Pointe Public School System

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

SECTION 418.131(1) .......ccccccccscssssscssssssessssesseseceessces 2 FEDERAL REGULATIONS iv : CLEAN AIR ACT. 36 FED. … pollutant” in the regulations to the Clean Air Act. 36 Fed.

Reply Brief — Wyman v. James

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971

San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967) ........... 4 “Clean Air Act. Eliz. 2c H Sec 100 (1955)............... 4 | Food Drug Act. … H Sect 100/5); Water Act 1948 11 & 126 c. 42 Section 48 (3) Clean Air Act, 1956, 4 & 5 Eliz. 2, c. 52 Section 31 and 32.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 42 (2017) (No. 16-285)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also issued a directive adhering to a judicially-invalidated interpretation of the Clean Air Act. Natl Envitl. Dev. Ass'n’s Clean Air Project v. … Ass’n’s Clean Air Project, 752 F.3d at 1003. The D.C. Circuit found “no merit in EPA’s arguments” and struck down the directive to ignore Summit.

Petition — Eli Lilly and Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

At issue in South Terminal were the EPA regulations for attaining the Clean Air Act’s national ambient air quality stand- ards in Boston by reducing vehicular traffic. … As to air pollu- tion EPA asserts in its brief that the Resource Con- servation and Recovery Act regulations will deal with air pollution associated with disposal of hazardous waste.

Transcript of Record — Mary Genevieve Pennell, Administratrix of the Estate of Jay Allen Pennell, Deceased, Plff. In Err. v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1931

That is what you mean by a clean break? A. That is what | mean by a clean break. (). You say now the train was going about fifteen miles an hour? A. Yes, (). … And when you went up to the front vou found that the pin in the tank had been broken clean and the engine drifted away? A. Yes, sir. ().

Amicus Curiae Brief — Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. Michael Cargill

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2024

Sept. 5, 2023) ........ 31 Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. … Pet.Br.18 (cleaned up).

Motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance · Jan 24, 2025

Under the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., each State generally has flexibility to determine how it will meet air-quality goals. Pet. App. 3a. … For “new motor vehicles,” how- ever, the Act directs EPA to prescribe nationwide “standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant * * * which in [EPA’s] judgment cause[s], or contribute[s

Respondents Brief — Donald J. Trump, former President of the United States, Petitioner v. Bennie G. Thompson, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 30, 2021

(cleaned up). … Br. 1-2) to impugn the Select Committee’s motives by citing public comments by certain of its Members.

Memo for Respondent — United States v. Brown

Supreme Court brief · Memo for Respondent · 1954

The respondent had served in the Army Air Force from October 27, 1942, to August 6, 1944. … Six Years later, on March 8, 1990, he was operated upon by the Veterans Administration for the purpose of ‘cleaning up’ the knee joint.

Opposition Brief — Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

The summary abatement provision of the ECL is mandated by the provisions of the Clean Air Act which require states to include as part of any approvable state implementation plan, authority comparable … Since the adoption of this provision in the Clean Air Act, other federal environmental statutes that have been adopted contain similar emergency provisions and extend the availability of such relief

Joint Appendix — Klehr v. AO Smith Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1997

Now, you mentioned commenting to Mr. … We agree with these comments and conclusions. XVII.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pamela Bondi, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. Jennifer VanDerStok, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2024

on the rule during the comment period.” … Cir. 2009) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — The Sherwin-Williams Company, Petitioner v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 16, 2018

Watson, Comment, Venturing into the “Impenetrable Jungle”: How California’s Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the Case of County … This Court reversed, holding that “the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants

Jurisdictional Statement — California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare Commission

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1980

The wage orders, by altering these policies for California employees, directly conflict with this principle of uniformity and wreck havoc on employers such as United Air Lines or American Air- lines … '® To the extent that the case of United Air Lines v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

See EPA, Interpretive Statement on Application of the Clean Water Act NPDES Program to Releases of Pollutants From a Point Source to Groundwater [“Interpretive Statement”], 84 Fed. … In UARG, the Court rejected EPA’s expansive interpretation of its Clean Air Act powers to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions, explaining: EPA’s interpretation is also unreasonable because it would bring

Reply Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992

Although increased litter is an in- evitable result of handbilling, the practice may not be banned to keep the streets clean. Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147, 162 (1939). … While the Port Authority points to unverified complaints during the period from 1975 through 1986, their nature and pattern is, if anything, a strong argument for the effectiveness of rules short of

Transcript of Record — Smith v. Hall

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1937

And in normal operation of an incubator of that kiftd you clean those fans periodically, do you not? That.is a normal operation? A. … As to commenting on Defendants’ Exhibit 75, which is the tabulation Dr.