Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Nor does our brief discuss specifics of how benefit-cost comparisons should be used under that section or under the Clean Water Act more generally. … Lave University Professor and Higgins Professor of Economics, Carnegie Mellon University Former Member, EPA Advisory Council on Clean Air Comptiance Analysis Robert Litan Senior Fellow, Brookings

Appendix — Chicago Park District v. Alexander

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 578 F.2d 115, 116 (Sth Cir.1978). … ,” “clean,” “in need of cleaning,” and “unacceptable” into the categories “very clean” and “less than very clean”).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Derek Steven Trumbull, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 21, 2025

The case concerned the Clean Air Act's requirement that States regulate “stationary sources” of air pollution in their borders. See 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … In amendments to the Clean Air Act, Congress told States to require permits for modifying or constructing “stationary sources” of air pollution. 42 U.S.C. § 7502(c)(5).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost, Attorney General of Ohio, Petitioner v. Rover Pipeline, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2025

the Clean Water Act within the Act’s specified period of time. … of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.); (2) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); or (3) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). 151a 33 U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

. § 7411(d), an ancillary provision of the Clean Air Act, did Congress constitutionally authorize the Environmental Protection Agency to issue significant rules – including those capable of reshaping the … Here the Clean Air Act is being misused in ways never intended.

Joint Appendix — United States Department of Energy v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1991

(b) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901 et seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder; (c) the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. … (hereinafter “RCRA”), Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3734, the Clean Water Act, and Ohio Revised Code Chapter 6111.

Appendices — American Airlines, Inc. v. Davies

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1993

The absurdity of this explanation in the present context is such as to require no further comment. … Nothing in this chap- ter shall prevent said carriers by air, or any class or classes of their employees, both acting through their representatives selected in accordance with provisions of this subchapter

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

The levels of these metals are lower than those present in air, garden soil, and many common foods. … For most people, even large companies, absorbing the legal expenses for that period of time can be economically devastating.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Oakland, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2021

It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Second, and only then, did the Court hold Congress displaced remedies that might be granted under federal common law through the Clean Air Act. See AEP, 564 U.S. at 425.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — General Dynamics Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Susan Scharpf

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 11, 2025

(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).

Joint Appendix — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1986

Air Act, and by Thomas M. … Air Act, and by Thomas M.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sullivan v. Brinegar

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973

, when required under section 309 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and section 8 of these guidelines, and (5) meeting the requirements of section 2(b) of Execu- tive Order 11514 for providing timely … The Environmental Protection Agency will assist in resolving any question relating to section 309 of the Clean Air Act, as amended.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2024

Clean Water Act section 402 requires permit issuers to include—in every NPDES permit—conditions that ensure that the discharge will meet the requirements of Clean Water Act section 301, including those … The Clean Water Act also allows others to enforce NPDES permit requirements. Bachelor, Dunseth, and Hooper Comment 5: U.S.

Petition — Hartigan v. General Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

And “air pollution” is defined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 (amending section 302{g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … Section 16 of the Clean Air Act qualifies federal powers only under that act. It does not purport to limit Sey?

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1950

In addition to performing an efficient and econ- omical cleaning operation and dispensing with the bother- some bag of prior art cleaners, which had to be cleaned frequently (R. 248), the structure … Find- ing 15, which relates to the question of infringement only, requires no comment beyond what was said by the Court of Appeals (R. 349, last par.).

Opposition Brief — Odegard v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

That night petitioner and Pizarrello cleaned the room to prepare for an inspection (Tr. 146). … when Agents Doerr and Doughman commented about the blue coloring on his hands after he rinsed them (Tr. 191).

Amicus Brief — Alcan Foil Products Division of Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1990

Regulations promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air Act provide that a SIP revision submitted to the EPA must have already been adopted by the state in final form. 40 CEFR 51.104(d). … Alean worked with the local agency to develop a bubble plan applicable to its facility, following a hearing at which the general public had an opportunity to comment.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

| re 7 RIE Teme. i a 7 p SS nk, ir 2 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES --Continued PAGE Clean Water Act pig te a rs passim Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(5)(A)@iii) 2... 10 a 2 Final Determination … In a unanimous opinion, the court struck down the EPA’s interpretation of a provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(5)(A)(iii) in language that is equally applicable here: In short, none

Appendix — United States v. Park

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975

Records should be retained for a period of time that exceeds the shelf life of the product, except that they need not be retained more than 2 years. … (3) Remove all insecure jewelry and, during periods where food is manipulated by hand, remove from hands any jewelry that cannot be adequately sanitized.

Petition — Woods v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

The Air Force’s current policy is AFP 160-44 (August 1977). … running of the limitation period applicable to an action based on the same facts brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C