Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.33s
Appendix — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
AP-73 of the National Air Pollution Control Administration, US. … The Cost of Air Pollu- tion Damages-A Status Report. U. S.
422 U.S. 289Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 26, 2021
Air Act (“CAA”) restricts states from even “attempt[ing] to enforce” tampering laws against manufacturers’ nationwide conduct, allowing this case to proceed would itself violate the very right petitioners … Air Act proscribes” ignores the numerous post-sale enforcement mechanisms the CAA directs EPA to employ—such as in-use testing, defect reporting, warranty compliance, recalls, and the CAA’s antitampering
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 129 A.3d 984 (Md. 2015) ............................................................ 15 McIndoe v. … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
He also noted a Senate committee report finding that a majority of States have expressed concerns about the “EPA’s failure to adhere to the Clean Air Act’s cooperative federalism design.” … From the Founding period to the enactment of the FVRA, the statutory period during which an acting officer could serve was relatively short—varying from ten days to six months.!
Transcript of Record — Ottinger v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1926
More moisture laden air would naturally cause dampness; but I should say if the gutter and leader were kept clean and painted, that would increase its life more than the fact of whether the air was … It has the usual cleaning doors to get at and clean the fire and to charge coal, and also cleaning doors in the upper part to handle the fire brick in and out, and the blast steam and steam and air
272 U.S. 579Opposition Brief — Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
VI, Cl. 2 (Supremacy Clause) ..........ccscssssssseevseesensees Clean Air Bat, GB UG, FBG cceccctzsstrerncesenrestivnnnecessinniees Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1965 .......ccccscocccsessssossssessesevsersees … Kean, 871 F.2d 319, 322-325 (8d Cir. 1989) (holding that, under citizen suit provision of Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604, district court has jurisdiction over citizen suit to compel state offi- cials
534 U.S. 1113Amicus Curiae Brief — The ERISA Industry Committee, Petitioner v. City of Seattle, Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2022
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983)................................................ 8 U.S. Chamber of Com. v. … Gobeille, 577 U.S. at 319–20 (cleaned up).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (Certiorari granted to review validity of EPA’s “bubble” concept under the Clean Air Act). 1] In this case, the Second Circuit ignored this settled ad- ministrative practice … Over 1200 comments were received during the public comment period.
489 U.S. 1089Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Murco Wall Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael D. Galier
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 16, 2017
or failures to act were: 1. … He testified there was dust in the air, and he was present while drywallers sanded the dried compound.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — M. C. C. of Florida, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1311. … The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311, set seq.
481 U.S. 1034Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
In carrying out these objectives, NRDC has undertaken efforts to obtain clean air, clean water and toxic substances control, including activities to en- sure effective implementation of health and _ … ;'’ the Federal Water Pollution Control Act;'* the Federal Clean Air Act;'’ the a properly conducted bioassay and sheuld be presumed to be a risk to humans and that, as such, prudent public health pol
499 U.S. 187Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rennekamp v. Mitchell (No. 882)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1957
While in operation, the said radio station would normally be kept on the air by a single employee at any given time, to-wit, an engineer-announcer, except for occasional broadcasts originating outside … Star Overall Dry Cleaning Company, C. C. A.
Transcript of Record — Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1916
Detailed comment in respect to anticipation is little necessary save to Froment,. … I have been continuously acting in a professional capacity for Minerals Separation, Limited, since the beginning of 1905, and T so acted, with about six months’ interregnum, for a period before that
242 U.S. 261Petition — Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
URE Ee Ae rae 9 008s 16 CONSTITUTION: re ae Eee oe 2 Vv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued STATUTES: Page Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7414 (Supp. … There is, for example, a pronounced similarity between the sampling authority granted by section 308 of the Clean Water Act and that granted by section 114 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
466 U.S. 980Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rice v. Mitchell
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
RULE VIOL 0516833100 MAX OISDAYS MAJ 38 PROFANE LANG/GESTURE/ACT COMMENT 040183 NEW PRISON POLICY FOR TIME CREDIT RULE VIOL 0402833100 MAX 030DAYS MAJ 18 POSSESSING ANY WEAPON CUSTODY 0616823100 CLOSE … TO MAX CUST REV 121682 COMMENT 020182 NEW PRISON POLICY POR TIME CREDIT COMMENT 23181 GOOD TIME POR PAR ELIG 0982 DAYS COMMENT 123181 G OOD TIME POR PAR ELIG 09862 DAYS PF 4-MENU W/DOC 5-MENU 6-BASE
506 U.S. 905Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
It is not the taxpayers per se who fund clean-ups when solvent PRPs cannot be located. Rather, Congress’s 1986 amendments to CERCLA create a Superfund that funds clean-up activities. … (emphases added); Ian Erickson, Comment, Reconciling the CERCLA Useful Product and Recy- cling Defenses, 80 N.C. L.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — English v. General Elec. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
During the period of March 5-9, 1984, plaintiff spent considerable work time cleaning up radiation contamina- tion at and around her work station, apparently left there by workers on preceding shifts … Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1367 (b); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622(b)(2)(A).
496 U.S. 72Opposition — Hartigan v. General Electric Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Spellman, 684 F. 2d 627 (9th Cir. 1982) 12, 16 Statutes and Regulations Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S. C. § 2021(k) .............. 5 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … Thus, the Clean Air Act was irrelevant and the Spent Fuel Statute fell squarely within the Atomic Energy Act's preemption of state regulation of radiological hazards.
461 U.S. 913Petition for Writ of Certiorari — North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
In reaching that conclusion, the Court relied on prior decisions holding that fees were available under the Clean Air Act for “the costs of representation before federal and state administrative agencies … Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986)), as well as under Title VII “for services performed in state administrative and_ judicial enforcement proceedings,” id. at 888-89 (citing
562 U.S. 1108Petitioners Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · May 9, 2019
INTRODUCTION The Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) is a landmark achievement in the nation’s efforts to address water pollution. … EPA proposed a Clean Air Act interpretation that would have caused one category of permits to jump from about 800 to nearly 82,000, and another category to jump from fewer than 15,000 to about 6.1 million
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.