Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.38s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 22, 2022
Air Act.” … The Second Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s argument that displacement by the Clean Air Act of any 19 remedy under federal common law allows state law to “snap back into action.”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Crane, Inc. v. Oney (No. 07-1073)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Cleaning, usually indoors. … Periodic examination by doctor. 13.9 Dermatitis. — a. Sources: Excessive or improper use of cleaning agents such as gasoline.
Appendix — Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
To date, most of our experi- ence with voltage reductions has been with limited time periods. … There is one aspect of the proposed relaxation on which we do not solicit comments at this time.
444 U.S. 962Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
. § 7409, the Clean Air Act pro- vision directing EPA to set and revise national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”), is an unconstitutional delega- tion of legislative power. … It hardly serves — indeed, it contravenes — that purpose to demand that EPA in effect draft a different, narrower version of the Clean Air Act.[] Under that view Congress would be able to delegate
531 U.S. 457Petition for Writ of Certiorari — DeBose v. Secretary of the Army
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
(k) Telling me I should not be airing out our office dirty laundry to the people in the EEO office. … And then the clean-up man, who was a conract clean-up person, came — and he was a black male — came in to empty the trash and vacuum, or whatever they do.
525 U.S. 1147Opposition — Shell Oil Co. v. West Michigan Environmental Action Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
The closing colloquy that day included the following comments: [Tr. pp 3222-3223] MR. SMITH: Judge, | would just like to make a requ- est. … The biggest share of the impacts go to recreational activ- ities, clearly not air, water or natural resources, particu- larly in terms of noise, that doesn’t go to air, water or natural resources.
444 U.S. 941Petition for Writ of Certiorari — PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cty. v. Washington Dept. of Ecology
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
The Clean Water Act a. The § 401 Certification Requirement. … Clean Water Act.
511 U.S. 700Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 1, 2026
But subsection (a) expressly makes that period subject to subsection (b), which 2 states that the Tier I period “shall be reduced” by five years after the prescribed ten-year clean record. … Subsection (b) then provides that the period “shall be reduced” by five years if the prescribed ten-year clean-record conditions are satisfied.
Opposition Brief — Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. Pakoototas (No. 06-1188)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006
United States Department of the Air Force 294 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (N.D. Cal. 2003) .......... ee. 26 ARC Ecology v. United States Department of the Air Force RE Fe Be Ee RE. … CERCLA provides the President, acting through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),? with several alternatives for cleaning up contaminated sites.
Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Air Act when it considered a cost factor in the determination of significant contribution under Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the Act. … Cir. 1997).......scscsssssssecsrscsrsocnresees 15 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page STATUTES: The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q (1994 & Deen, TE TGF scnctssenisnmninsnidnteelcgia eee
532 U.S. 903Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Karin Weng, Petitioner v. Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 12, 2024
SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, Appellee. … SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, Appellee.
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Reading Co. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943
Is the taxpayer entitled to a bad debt deduction in 1936 under Section 23 (k) of the Revenue Act of 1936? STATUTE INVOLVED - Revenue Act of 1936, ¢. 690, 49 Stat. 1648: Src. 23. … During this period 5 Seashore requested and obtained advances from the taxpayer and Pennsylvania as follows (R. 9a) : : ‘Taxpayer Pennsylvania ‘ sb ie aires ei Seiad Nia UCN 5] June 25 to December
318 U.S. 778Petitioners Reply Brief — Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1944
Petitioner has not acted as part of a group or pool, . … This comment applies likewise to the. experimental vapor-phase plant which Dr.
322 U.S. 471Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Sep 4, 2019
III ............................................. 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ................................... 10 Natural Gas Act, ch. 556, 52 Stat. 821 (15 U.S.C. 717 et seq … In Massachusetts, the Court observed that the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., afforded States the right to challenge EPA’s rejection of a petition for a rulemaking to curb greenhouse gas emissions
Reply Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1981
bs CRIED 000 0e es cine ieeeche thao acaeivadeue Statutes Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 etseq ............. Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, Bo UA. … denied, 420 U.S. 927 (1975) which case merely cited the Clean Water Act but relied on the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §401 et seq.) for its holding.
451 U.S. 304Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The provisions of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act that addressed hazardous air pollutants, 42 U.S.C. § 7412, significantly changed the regulation of those pollutants. … Air Act amendments, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7651-765lo.
Record and brief — Thermofil Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
Air Surrey Corp. v NLRB 601 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1979)."! 620 F2d at 125. … ''In Air Surrey, supra, the Court stated: It hes long been the law in our circuit that an employer cannot be held in violation of section 8(a)(1) of the Act when it discharges an employee for activity
455 U.S. 1016Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
A public comment period was held from February through April, 1993 and the ROD for OU # | was issued on June 30, 1993. … The original complaint filed by the United S tates was brought pursuant to Section 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), certain sections of the Clean Water Act and the Refuse Act
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
New Jersey courts have concluded that ECRA and the Spill Act apply in pari materia. See Superior Air Products v. NL Indus., Inc., 522 A.2d 1025, 1035 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. … See Superior Air Prod. v. NL Industries, 216 N.J. Super. 46, 522 A.2d 1025 (App. Div. 1987) (analyzing the relationship between ECRA and the Spill Act).
511 U.S. 1046Appendix — Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1945
Walks, platforms, and approaches lead- ing into factories shall be kept clean. . 28 Sec. 6. … Air used in blowing or aerating the oil during the process of manufacture shall be pure and clean, and shall be taken from the outside of the building; and in order to prevent the use of air which is
326 U.S. 752
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.