Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.18s

  • Petition for Rehearing — Brocail v. Detroit Tigers, Inc. (No. 09-72)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 2009

    Norge Diviston of Magic Chef, Ine. 486 U.S. 399 (1988) . 4,6, 8, 13, Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 (1994) Loewen Group Intl v. … Littig., 251 F.Supp.24 Ti (19.1.0. ZOO) oo. cccccsescssccsseet Voilas v. General Motors Corp., 170 F.3d 367 (3d Cir. 1999). Williams v. NFL, I3d ; 2901928 (8th Cir. Sept. 11, 2009)..

  • Reply Brief — Terry Lynn King, Petitioner v. Tony Mays, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 24, 2023

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ..................................................................... 5 Gregg v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986); Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 187 (1976); Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 87 (1985); Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764, 774 (1990)).

  • Reply Brief — Billy Daniel Raulerson, Jr., Petitioner v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 10, 2020

    Randall, the Court described how burden-shifting rules squared with common-law tradition. 357 U.S. 513, 523-24 (1958). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 416 (1986)). But this proves too much.

  • Reply Brief — John Kevin Woodward, Petitioner v. California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 20, 2024

    No. 24-227 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________________________ JOHN KEVIN WOODWARD, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ____________________________________ Petitioner, Respondent. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970) ................................................8 Constitutional Provisions U.S. Const. amend. V ..................................................2 Statutes Cal.

  • Record and brief — Magwood v. Patterson

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2010

    Ayzer, 399 So.2d at 339. … Br. 24.

    561 U.S. 320
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Segura v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … FABRICANT Dickstein & Fabricant 24 East 21st Street New York, New York 10010 Counsel for Petitioners

    468 U.S. 796
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In Re James A. Wolfe, Petitioner

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 6, 2024

    . $ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil No. 3:24-cv-21 JAMES A. WOLFE, ' (Judge Mariani) Plaintiff • FILED SCRANTON v. … Procedure 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE a copy of the complaint (Doc. 1), notice of lawsuit and request to waive service of summons (form AO 398), waiver of the service of summons (form AO 399

  • Opposition Brief — United States Nat. Bank of Ore. v. Independent Ins. Agents of America, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

    Bank Act Section 92 passim 12 U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) 2,11 N.M. Stat. … Agents, 399 F.2d 1010, 1016 (Sth Cir. 1968) ‘eMphasis in original).

    508 U.S. 439
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Krivda

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

    Moore, 35 Ml. 2d 399, 220 N.E. 2d 443 (1966) ii. Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)...........-.. li Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)... ...........- ee eee 7 Trask v. … Rev. 45 (1957)..............-05: 5 Plumb, ‘‘Illegal Enforcement of the Law,’’ 24 Cornell ee a | Ter!

    409 U.S. 33
  • Opposition — Griffith v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975

    Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243; United States v. Bristol, 473 F. 2d 439, 445 (C.A. 5). 4 3. … Ct. 754, 24 L. Ed. 2d 753 (1969) ; Bruce vs. U.S., 351 F. 2d 318, 5th Cir. (1965), Cert. den., 384 U.S. 921, 86 S. Ct. 1370, 16 L. Ed. 2d 441 (1966).

    423 U.S. 926
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sandberg v. New England Novelty Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1944

    United States, 264 Fed. 399. In this connection the attention of the Court is directed to the principle that is established in the case of Erie Rail- road Co. v. … The petition for contempt was filed and an order of notice was issued thereon on October 24, 1941 (Record, page 34).

    323 U.S. 740
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2019

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). 5 Justices typically spoke unanimously.11 Only about 8% of cases included a dissenting opinion. … Id. at 534. 24 Republican Party of Minnesota, 536 U.S. at 777–78. 10 ought to be able to ensure that their cases are decided in an ideologically-balanced way.

  • Opposition Brief — New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

    After dismissing claims based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court rendered summary judgment for Petitioner Taxation & Revenue Department on September 24, 1997. … These steps — from bid solicitation to delivery — were often accomplished the same day and almost always within 24 hours.

    528 U.S. 928
  • Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971

    United States, 399 F. 24.93, certiorari . © denied, 393 U.S. 1025 __..... + Parker Vv. United States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari denied, 356 U.S. 964 - —_ “SEL ar 8 Remmer v. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, — Gael, BT Te cp i es are. . United, States v. McGuire, 381 F. 2d OR re 8 United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 _.- 8 ' United States v.

    404 U.S. 823
  • Appendix — Koran v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971

    United States, make a print of an obligation of the United States, to wit: a $5.00 Federal Reserve Note drawn on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Series 1950E, Check Letter “P,” Face Plate No. 399 … Whether the “Con- current sentence” doctrine enunciated in Hirabayashi has continiung validity in light of subsequent decisions will be argued before the Su- preme Court on March 24, 1969.

    402 U.S. 948
  • Motion to Dismiss Appeal — F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Gerosa

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1959

    D. sales (fol. 323, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 151). … (one document) showing, among other things, the number of units of each descrip- tion ordered by the distributer (fols. 101-104, 176, 186, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 150).

    358 U.S. 282
  • Opposition Brief — Houston Byrd, Jr., Petitioner v. Christopher Cook, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 1, 2022

    Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 90 S. Ct. 2117 (1970) ..................... 9 Warthman v. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 297, 90 S. Ct. 2117 (1970).

  • Brief for the United States — Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1971

    Martin, 375 U.S. 399 -......----.-----2 at Bowe Vv. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 416 F.2d 711 _..... ‘. Carrington Vv. … United States, 416 F.2d 980, 989 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied, February 24, 1970, No. 1015, this Term.

    400 U.S. 542
  • Motion to Dismiss — Holekamp v. Holekamp Lumber Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1961

    . — pp. 364-399, elas one gt gt IER 2 Ae lS a ae a 4 (‘onstitution of Missouri, 1875 ......... ween neeneeone 9,-3- Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1899, Section 958 ....3, 10, 11 Revised Statutes of … W. 2d at §80-681, 683; Jurisdictional Statement, pp. 21-24, 28). ‘This finding of ee, power with respect to the charters of corpora- tions Sich as Holekamp is the very heart of the opinion.

    366 U.S. 715
  • Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971

    United States, 399 F.2d 93, certiorari : denied, 393 U.S. 1025 : _* Parker v. United‘ States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari : denied, 356-U.S. 964 ___ ' Remmer v. United States, 347 U. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 886 * United States Vv. McGuire, 381 F. 2d 306 _ United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 - United .States v.

    404 U.S. 823

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.