Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Transcript of Record — FPC v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1961
Cleaning costs in the area are increased to a major extent by air pollution and its effects. … periods pro- viding the method used and the periods of time are approved by the commissioner.”’
365 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Committee for Environmentally Sound Development, Inc. v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg., and the New York City Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (“ULURP” ; New York City Charter § 197-c. … The Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act establishes a well balanced system of regulation in which the federal government, the states, individual citizens and the courts each have distinct, Clearly defined
531 U.S. 814Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019
For example, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 74017671q, requires States to enact and oversee “state implementation plans,” which States have wide discretion to shape so long as they are deemed likely … Army Corps of Engineers released proposed guidance concerning the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., 9 which expanded the waters subject
Petition — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Donovan
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
(en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 (1976), though both of these cases involved review of EPA regula- tions under the Clean Air Act dealing with the threat of lead in the general environment. … The Clean Air Act, under which EPA issued its new standard, does not require any proof that a na- tional air quality standard is technologically or economi- cally feasible.
453 U.S. 913Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sprenger, Olson & Shutes, P. A. v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, No. 85-5 .... 5,6,7 Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, ___ US. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S.Ct. 3088 (1986).
484 U.S. 821Respondents Reply Brief — Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Reply Brief · 1944
Brown testified (III, 1484-5) ‘that the elevation of a vessel containing liquid “perhaps ~ 20 feet in the air or 25 feet: in the air’? would have been.” … ously, withent wasteful periodic shut-downs of expensive plant ‘equipment.
322 U.S. 471Petitioners Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2010
oPrcane C og ri nel or eddedarricks Ti ’ . , Counsel of Record -- QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVLEW At issue in this case as the matching funds provision of Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act … Respondent CCEC has repeatedly stated that the purpose of the Clean Elections Act is to “level the playing field.” JASOS, 457, : #40, S54-35, Record 145-4(19:23-25, 20:1-10, 25, 26), 326-31).
562 U.S. 1060Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rizzi v. Underwater Construction Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
While the Longshore Act does not define “Navigable Waters,” the United States Code Annotated (herein “USCA”), in Chapter 26 of its section on Navigation and Navigable Waters and the Clean Water Act, … A permanent disability is one which has continued for a lengthy period and is of lasting or indefinite duration, as distinguished from one in which recovery merely awaits a normal healing period.
519 U.S. 931Opposition Brief — Chapman v. Luna
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
, § 74-2-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1978 (hereafter “Air Act’’), and function- ing pursuant to ‘he Air Act. … It does not have any reasonable basis, nor is it designed to further the objectives of cleaning up the air.
474 U.S. 947Transcript of Record — Coryell v. Phipps
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943
That, pressure should -’ a aveided if. at all’ possible, because it will act on ‘the © be joints . of the air pipe, and. may cause gasoline vapors — to. … How long «was the five pounds of air riaomnees ap- - plied?. A: About ten minutes. | Q. And while the air pressure of five pounds was on the tanks for that period, what did you obsery e?
317 U.S. 406Amicus Curiae Brief — Pittston Co. v. Babbitt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Thirty years later in conjunction with construing the breadth of judicial review provisions in the Clean Air Act, Chief Justice (then Associate Justice) Rehnquist noted that “[t]he broad language of … Powell, concurring) ("I continue to have reservations about the constitutionality of the notice and review preclusion provisions of [the Clean Air Act]").
517 U.S. 1134Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
See, ¢.g., Air Pirates, 581 F.2d at 756; Berlin v. E. C. … Defendants forfeit all copies of As Clean As They Wanna Be, including all masters, tapes or other means by which As Clean As They Wanna Be can be reproduced. , .
510 U.S. 569Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mohamad Jamal Khweis, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 4, 2021
Finally, on April 8, Connelly commented to other intelligence agents via email that “[Khweis] is lined up perfectly for the clean team.” J.A. 894. … Op. 457-58 (summarizing Connelly's “clean team” emails); J.A. 895, 921–22 (further references to the “taint” and “clean” team, as well as an “attenuation period,” in Connelly's emails); J.A. 901 (email
Brief for American Farm Bureau Federation — Mitchell v. Budd
Supreme Court brief · Brief for American Farm Bureau Federation · 1956
Stich period of tine is no ahore. than is required for the actual growing or. production on farms of many agric ‘ultural prodacts. … Grad- ing: cracking, sbelling. cleaning, sertings packings and storing.
350 U.S. 473Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 15, 2021
Conceivably, a slowdown caused by closing parts of the restaurant for cleaning could be attributed to a “period of restoration.” … Acts or decisions, including the failure to act or decide, of any person, group, organization or governmental body. c.
Transcript of Record — Louisiana v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1900
Flat cars to be swept clean. Box cars shall be made mechanically clean and dry, and sent open to the relay station, where they are to be inspected for tramps. … The application of gaseous disinfection to these articles should be made in a closed space, air-tight, or as nearly so as possibie.
176 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Bencel v. Frost
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965
The Act does | not make the employer an insurer. … No accidents had occurred during that long period.
382 U.S. 831Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 22, 2022
Air Act.” … The Second Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s argument that displacement by the Clean Air Act of any 19 remedy under federal common law allows state law to “snap back into action.”
Appendix — Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
To date, most of our experi- ence with voltage reductions has been with limited time periods. … There is one aspect of the proposed relaxation on which we do not solicit comments at this time.
444 U.S. 962Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
. § 7409, the Clean Air Act pro- vision directing EPA to set and revise national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”), is an unconstitutional delega- tion of legislative power. … It hardly serves — indeed, it contravenes — that purpose to demand that EPA in effect draft a different, narrower version of the Clean Air Act.[] Under that view Congress would be able to delegate
531 U.S. 457
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.