Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.09s

  • Transcript of Record — FPC v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1961

    Cleaning costs in the area are increased to a major extent by air pollution and its effects. … periods pro- viding the method used and the periods of time are approved by the commissioner.”’

    365 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Committee for Environmentally Sound Development, Inc. v. City of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000

    Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg., and the New York City Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (“ULURP” ; New York City Charter § 197-c. … The Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act establishes a well balanced system of regulation in which the federal government, the states, individual citizens and the courts each have distinct, Clearly defined

    531 U.S. 814
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019

    For example, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 74017671q, requires States to enact and oversee “state implementation plans,” which States have wide discretion to shape so long as they are deemed likely … Army Corps of Engineers released proposed guidance concerning the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., 9 which expanded the waters subject

  • Petition — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Donovan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 (1976), though both of these cases involved review of EPA regula- tions under the Clean Air Act dealing with the threat of lead in the general environment. … The Clean Air Act, under which EPA issued its new standard, does not require any proof that a na- tional air quality standard is technologically or economi- cally feasible.

    453 U.S. 913
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sprenger, Olson & Shutes, P. A. v. Burlington Northern Railroad

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

    Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, No. 85-5 .... 5,6,7 Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, ___ US. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S.Ct. 3088 (1986).

    484 U.S. 821
  • Respondents Reply Brief — Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Reply Brief · 1944

    Brown testified (III, 1484-5) ‘that the elevation of a vessel containing liquid “perhaps ~ 20 feet in the air or 25 feet: in the air’? would have been.” … ously, withent wasteful periodic shut-downs of expensive plant ‘equipment.

    322 U.S. 471
  • Petitioners Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2010

    oPrcane C og ri nel or eddedarricks Ti ’ . , Counsel of Record -- QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVLEW At issue in this case as the matching funds provision of Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act … Respondent CCEC has repeatedly stated that the purpose of the Clean Elections Act is to “level the playing field.” JASOS, 457, : #40, S54-35, Record 145-4(19:23-25, 20:1-10, 25, 26), 326-31).

    562 U.S. 1060
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rizzi v. Underwater Construction Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

    While the Longshore Act does not define “Navigable Waters,” the United States Code Annotated (herein “USCA”), in Chapter 26 of its section on Navigation and Navigable Waters and the Clean Water Act, … A permanent disability is one which has continued for a lengthy period and is of lasting or indefinite duration, as distinguished from one in which recovery merely awaits a normal healing period.

    519 U.S. 931
  • Opposition Brief — Chapman v. Luna

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    , § 74-2-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1978 (hereafter “Air Act’’), and function- ing pursuant to ‘he Air Act. … It does not have any reasonable basis, nor is it designed to further the objectives of cleaning up the air.

    474 U.S. 947
  • Transcript of Record — Coryell v. Phipps

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943

    That, pressure should -’ a aveided if. at all’ possible, because it will act on ‘the © be joints . of the air pipe, and. may cause gasoline vapors — to. … How long «was the five pounds of air riaomnees ap- - plied?. A: About ten minutes. | Q. And while the air pressure of five pounds was on the tanks for that period, what did you obsery e?

    317 U.S. 406
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Pittston Co. v. Babbitt

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

    Thirty years later in conjunction with construing the breadth of judicial review provisions in the Clean Air Act, Chief Justice (then Associate Justice) Rehnquist noted that “[t]he broad language of … Powell, concurring) ("I continue to have reservations about the constitutionality of the notice and review preclusion provisions of [the Clean Air Act]").

    517 U.S. 1134
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    See, ¢.g., Air Pirates, 581 F.2d at 756; Berlin v. E. C. … Defendants forfeit all copies of As Clean As They Wanna Be, including all masters, tapes or other means by which As Clean As They Wanna Be can be reproduced. , .

    510 U.S. 569
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mohamad Jamal Khweis, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 4, 2021

    Finally, on April 8, Connelly commented to other intelligence agents via email that “[Khweis] is lined up perfectly for the clean team.” J.A. 894. … Op. 457-58 (summarizing Connelly's “clean team” emails); J.A. 895, 921–22 (further references to the “taint” and “clean” team, as well as an “attenuation period,” in Connelly's emails); J.A. 901 (email

  • Brief for American Farm Bureau Federation — Mitchell v. Budd

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for American Farm Bureau Federation · 1956

    Stich period of tine is no ahore. than is required for the actual growing or. production on farms of many agric ‘ultural prodacts. … Grad- ing: cracking, sbelling. cleaning, sertings packings and storing.

    350 U.S. 473
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mama Jo’s, Inc., dba Berries, Petitioner v. Sparta Insurance Company

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 15, 2021

    Conceivably, a slowdown caused by closing parts of the restaurant for cleaning could be attributed to a “period of restoration.” … Acts or decisions, including the failure to act or decide, of any person, group, organization or governmental body. c.

  • Transcript of Record — Louisiana v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1900

    Flat cars to be swept clean. Box cars shall be made mechanically clean and dry, and sent open to the relay station, where they are to be inspected for tramps. … The application of gaseous disinfection to these articles should be made in a closed space, air-tight, or as nearly so as possibie.

    176 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Bencel v. Frost

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965

    The Act does | not make the employer an insurer. … No accidents had occurred during that long period.

    382 U.S. 831
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. San Mateo County, California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 22, 2022

    Air Act.” … The Second Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s argument that displacement by the Clean Air Act of any 19 remedy under federal common law allows state law to “snap back into action.”

  • Appendix — Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979

    To date, most of our experi- ence with voltage reductions has been with limited time periods. … There is one aspect of the proposed relaxation on which we do not solicit comments at this time.

    444 U.S. 962
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    . § 7409, the Clean Air Act pro- vision directing EPA to set and revise national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”), is an unconstitutional delega- tion of legislative power. … It hardly serves — indeed, it contravenes — that purpose to demand that EPA in effect draft a different, narrower version of the Clean Air Act.[] Under that view Congress would be able to delegate

    531 U.S. 457

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.