Documents

Reply Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

More recently, in deciding whether an EPA decision under the Clean Air Act was ripe for review, the Court explained: The question before us here is purely one of statutory interpretation that would … The relevant subsection of EPA’s regulation, 40 C.F.R. § 123.61(a)(1), requires the agency to provide a comment period “during which interested members of the public may express their views on the

Respondents Brief — Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 14, 2018

In December 2014, the State published a Notice of Complete Application, which opened a public comment period on the application. (CA2 J.A. 1725.) … The State received more than 15,000 public comments on the application. (CA2 J.A. 2853.) Active review of the application continued throughout the comment period and the following months.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Commander Oil Corp. v. Barlo Equipment Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

§ 7501 et seq.], or State implementation plans 93a Appendix E submitted in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C.A. § 7410] (and not disapproved by the Administrator of the … under section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C.A. § 7412], and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture

Petition — MARSHALL v. AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (Nos. 78-1036, 78-911)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

The 1971 standard provided that average exposure over an eight-hour period could not exceed 10 parts of benzene per million parts of air (ppm), and that short-term exposure could not exceed 50 ppm … EPA, 427 U.S. 246 (1976) (structure of Clean Air Act indi- cates that it contains no requirement that air pollu- tion regulations be economically or technologically feasible); Comment, Jmplementing

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Young v. State University of New York

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

The State then comments as to this proceeding -- "In this case we might add lack of a ‘known' unfortunate result. … "Service" shall mean the act of delivering, in accordance with provisions of this Article a notice of discipline.

Opposition Brief — Frank Kendall, Secretary of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Hunter Doster, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 18, 2023

See also Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, H.R. Rep. … The judiciary stood as the one restraint on the political branches’ relentless march during that period. See id. at 1316.

Petition — Morrison v. Stetson

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

The slate is wiped clean: As a matter of federal contract law, it seems clear that the petitioners and the Air Force contracted with respect to this well-established principle of mili- tary law. … This law, like the Doctor Draft Act, authorized the President to make special draft calls for physicians under age thirty-five.

Petition — Western Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Alaska

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857h- 7. … The Secretary’s duty to consider the alternative of delay is underlined by the EPA/CEQ determinations, made pursuant to § 809 of the Clean Air Act, that the sale was “environmen- tally unsatisfactory

Opposition Brief — Filoso v. Prince William County School Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

Additionally, the school provided her with two HEPA air purifiers, and the building engineer installed a separate air filter in the HVAC vent of her classroom. Jd. … For example, while at Forest Park, Filoso demanded that her classroom be disconnected altogether from the computerized central HVAC system, which provides air conditioning, heat, humidity and air quality

Petition — Exxon Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

Petitioner in that case sought to chal- lenge a Clean Air Act regulation granting the Adminis- trator of the EPA the authority to approve alternate standards for emission controls proposed by a state … The court held that the litigation was not moot because the subsisting chal- lenge to the authority of the EPA Administrator, as set forth in the Clean Air Act amendment, remained.

Reply Brief for the Petitioner — United Air Lines, Inc. v. Sprogis

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1971

The steward stows baggage, cleans the cabin, 3 lounges and lavatories of planes. … A17), is precisely what has created the confusion over the meaning of the Act described in the petition. (Pet. 12-16.)

Supplemental Appendix — Teamsters Freight Local Union No. 480 v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1984

Louis Terminal who acted a — as a “‘fuel man’’, and who also washed windshields as ap- propriate, when he was on duty. … and they wouldn’t clean them...’’ 18.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mach-Tech, Ltd. Partnership v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

The nonexclusive license option provided Serv-Tech with the right to manufacture and use the Fast Clean System in Serv-Tech’s service operations for the 18-month period after the Fast Clean System was … to the 18-month period.

Petition for Rehearing — Franklin Cox, Petitioner v. Texas Workforce Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Nov 10, 2020

I supervised Plaintiff Franklin Cox (“Cox”) (CR 170)( App A).Calverley does not states the relevant time period he was Cox am supervis­ or. … Rivera (115 Tig instr­ uctor am) and Air Gas service tech for Argon and Co2 tanks. Mr. Calverley stated that it was leaks all over the lab.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

See Washington Dept. of > The Clean Air Act was amended in 1977 to authorize EPA to treat tribes as states for the Act’s program. 42 U.S.C. § 7474 (1994); the Safe | Drinking Water Act was amended in … Enacted in 1976, RCRA is perhaps the most pervasive federal environmental statute that overlaps the Clean Water Act, supra, the Clean Air Act, supra, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation

Reply Brief — Washington v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971

The present federal legislation on the subject is the National Emission Standards Act, enacted in 1965, and amended by the Air Quality Act of 1967. … Plaintiff Handy would have this Court establish a right to clean air and a safe and healthy environment within the penumbra of the United States Constitution and its amend- ments.

Appendices — Producer Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2004

Comments addressing the questions set out in this notice may also be filed by September 3, 2003. … quality standards pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.§ 7401 et seqg.), to the extent that activities authorized under this Act significantly affect the air quality of any State.

Transcript of Record — Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Koppal

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1953

Act. … Over what period. or periods of time had the plaintiff - been employed by the defendant according to the ‘records -of defendant, and during said period or periods in what capacity was the plaintiff

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Maddox v. Shroyer

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1962

Doidge secured air hoses and an electric blower which were attached to power lines running from the ship yards. The * an . r . … The actual cleaning .of the genetators w as done. by spray ing carhon tetrachlor- ide on the getierators, from a spray gun connected. to an. air hose.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

They moder- ate periods of drought and flood, provide cool, clean water to drink, and host diverse communities of plants and animals when in good condition. … While Clean Water Act point source permitting programs have successfully reduced water pollution, non-point source programs under the Act have been ineffective.