Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Record and brief — Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
(6) The coated blanks were then passed through an in- frared drying oven maintained at an interior air temperature of 425° F for a period of 20 seconds to remove the water and form a dry film on the … Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608 (1950). 2.
456 U.S. 990Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 6, 2017
of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., entitles “any person” to file suit “against the Administrator [of the Environmental Protection Agency] where there is alleged a failure of the Administrator … Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administers and enforces the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Dayless Manufacturing Co. v. Artmoore Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1954
Linde Air Products Co., Mais vdiks a0 ils eee dtionbaeaw swede 8,10 Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. … Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. vy. Ray-O-Vac Co., 321 U. 8. 275, and many other cases.
347 U.S. 920Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2023
In its view, any arguments that the Clean Air Act also displaced state-law claims should be asserted as an ordinary preemption defense. See ibid. … As a result, there is no state law for the Clean Air Act (or any other federal statute) to resurrect: state law did not govern interstate emissions before Congress acted, and the application of state law
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timmons v. Cassell, 122 S. Ct. 548 (2001) (No. 01-474)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
The kitchen had a sink and cabinets, a modern bathroom had been added about 1970, and about 1971 a forced air, fuel oil furnace had been installed in the basement with ductwork and warm air registers … A big tractor, and clean up the yard? A. Right.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2026
Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may revise a National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) without the “thorough review” required by section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act simply because … INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Under the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets a national limit on fineparticle air pollution.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Act, Section 306.....................ccccessssesesees 21 Clean Water Act, Section 316(a) ...........0.0.. 0... cc ccc ee eee eee 5 Clean Water Act, Section 316(b) ..........0..0..0....... passim Clean … Energy Commission, Comments on SWRCB Scoping Document and Proposed State- wide Policy on Clean Water Act State Water Resources Control Board at 7 (Sept. 26, 2006).
Joint Appendix — Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Trades Council
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1988
The examiner or attorney assigned to the case will be pleased to receive and to act promptly upon your sug- gestions or comments to this end. … Outside air load shall be based on o.l. cfm/square foot or total exhaust air, whichever is larger. b.
485 U.S. 568Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2021
Products Are Coming Clean, 49 U. … Coming Clean, 49 U.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
The Act Manifests Clear Congressional Intent to Attain Clean Water. The Act is a comprehensive ‘and far-reaching law designed to clean up the Nation’s waters. … Oct. 17, 1972). 29 Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Air and Water Pol- lution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act.
420 U.S. 35Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Koresko v. Farley
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Natural Resources and the Public Estate The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of, the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic val- ues of the environment. … The Pennsylvania Constitution, Article I, §27 provides: “The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, his- toric and esthetic values of the environment
543 U.S. 1090Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
It used the English language in a functional sense.* In this regard, the citizen suit provision in EPCRA is different from those in the Clean Water Act and the amended Clean Air Act. … There is no reasonable justification for treating violations of the Clean Air Act differently.” id. at 11918. 12 —e _— "= it drafted the [CWA).
523 U.S. 83Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 24, 2021
Petitioner seeks review of a panel decision vacating the ACE rule (and reviving the CPP) based on a rejection of the EPA’s construction of the Clean Air Act. … Importantly, while the EPA does not affirmatively seek review of the decision below, it does not defend it either, and has never walked back its interpretation of the Clean Air Act reflected in the ACE
Amicus Curiae Brief — Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)............. 5,18 Constitutional Provisions United States Constitution, Article III, §2, Rr a eee ROR ee aah Co maen passim Statutes Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. $7604 .... … ' See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604 (Supp. 1991); Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1365 (1988); Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. $9659 (1988); Endangered
508 U.S. 946Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wells v. City of Alexandria
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
We further note that the three specific cleaning and maintenance assignments about which Wells complains occurred during periods where his doctors treatment/restriction reports state that his activities … Q DID YOU EVER HEAR HIM TELL HIM THAT - FOR HIM TO CLEAN THE HOT WELL OUT? A NO, SIR, I WASN'T THERE. Q OR TO CHECK FOR AIR LEAKS TN THE CONDENSER? A (INDICATING A NEGATIVE ESPONSE) MR.
543 U.S. 1000Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Irvin v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
It covered a half an hour or an hour or a 40-minute period. … During this same period, Mrs.
479 U.S. 852Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwest Airlines Co., Petitioner v. Latrice Saxon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2022
The 1936 amendments added a subchapter II to the Railway Labor Act covering “Carriers by Air.” … App. 24a-25a (cleaned up).
Respondents Brief — Christina Alessio, Petitioner v. United Airlines, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 11, 2023
For years, she has complained about United’s use of chemical cleaning products and air fresheners in the aircraft cabins within which she works. … The Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, correctly determined that res judicata barred Alessio from relitigating her claim for injuries due to exposure to cleaning products and air fresheners
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Reg. 21,292, 21,294 (Apr. 20, 2000)......... 19, 20, 22 25, 26 vill TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued OTHER AUTHORITIES Clean Water Act Definition of Fill Hearing Before Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands … Reg. 21,292, 21,294 (Apr. 20, 2000); see also Clean Water Act Definition of Fill Hearing Before Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wet- lands, and Climate Change of the S.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 23, 2026
MEINK, Secretary of the Air Force, et al., Respondents. … MEFNK, Secretary of the Air Force; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE: DAVID S. CRUIKSHANK; DOUGLAS C.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.