Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Respondents Brief — Smith v. Hall
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1937
Sec. 5403, Act of March 4, 1909. ’ Certainly, that violation was not of advantage to any one but Petitioner, as against the general pubiic. … - JUDGE MANTON’S COMMENT.
301 U.S. 216Transcript of Record — Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1919
the filter in a clean and dry state. … We treated during that period 22,536 tons. Q 41.
250 U.S. 336Reply Brief — United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1985
V (Takings Claus 15 Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.: CI 16 üer... ..ñ 17 uren. . passim CLI 17 II 12 Durrer. . 9 3B UBL. … Certainly, Riverside would not contend that this fact negates their status as “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act.)
474 U.S. 121Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2019
A public comment period followed, during which the Department received many comments on the draft permit. … raise this issue during the public comment period.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hollingsworth v. Lane Community College
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
air, clean water, child care, toxins, pesticides, and stream walks. … By aiming to gut the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air act, and many other health reforms (not to mention student loans and welfare assistance), the “Contract” leaves students
532 U.S. 941Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dead Sea Bromine Co., Ltd. v. Patrickson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
The issue has been addressed as well by numerous law review commentators, who are also at odds as to the status of subsidiaries under the Act.’ A quarter of a century after the FSIA’s 5. … See Comment: Litigating Claims Over Foreign Government- Owned Corporations under the Commercial Activities Exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 20 J. Inn. L.
537 U.S. 1185Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000-Coasta! … , Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 — Sierra Nevada-Cascade Mountain Region) § 5096.350 (West Supp. 2000.)
531 U.S. 159Joint Appendix — Joshua E. Bufkin, Petitioner v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Jul 2, 2024
Air Force…. … Mental Disorder Diagnosis #3: ICD Code: Comments, if any: Mental Disorder Diagnosis #4: ICD Code: JA53 Comments, if any: If additional diagnoses, describe using above format: 2B.
Reply Brief — New York, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 2, 2018
See Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2439 (2014). … Ct. 2699, 2707-08 (2015) (interpreting Clean Air Act provision as requiring EPA to consider economic costs).
Reply Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2014
EPA, 529 F.3d 1077 Ne IE sc ticinitele sian eladtosceinirust sbatedonmmadil 10, 12 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401, et seq. … Reg. 38,044 (Sept. 14, 1989) .........0.0.. 12 INTRODUCTION Section §112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §7412(n)(1)(A), requires the U.S.
Opposition Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 23, 2023
Moreover, “the Clean Air Act has displaced any relevant federal common law in this area.” Id. … emissions,” namely the Clean Air Act.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schneider v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
period. … On 1/5/90, clean mastoid bowl, healing well, 20% perforation of the tympanic membrane.
513 U.S. 1077Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ioan Lela, Petitioner v. Thomas J. Dart, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 17, 2025
Within two weeks, an employee at the jail responded to the grievance by cleaning the air vents in Leia's housing unit. … system by cleaning the air vents in his housing unit.
Appendix — Shore Club Condominium Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2005
initial period of the certification as beginning the date the Respondent begins to bargain in 4. … The only cleaning or maintenance function performed by the Employer’s security employees, is to clean occasional messes when no maintenance employee is on duty and to keep the security offices neat.
546 U.S. 820Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Code §25000.5(a) (West) ................... 16 Clean Air Act ................................................... 2, 20, 23 Clean Water Act .................................................. 20, 24 2009 … and Clean Water Act.3 Pet.App.17a; see also, e.g., 3 As the Amici States have explained elsewhere, the Clean Air Act has its own preemptive force in this context.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. Pakoototas (No. 06-1188)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
See, e.g., 33 U.S.C. § 1342(k) (compliance with a permit issued under the Clean Water Act is deemed compliance with that Act); 42 U.S.C. § 7661c(f) (compliance with a permit issued under the Clean Air … plan required for surface mining permit, including steps to be taken to comply with the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and other environmental laws and regulations).
Joint Appendix — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1995
Section 6972(b)(1), of plaintiff’s intent to pursue legal action against Defendants within the appro- priate statutory period to recover its clean up costs. … EPA notifying him of Plaintiff's intent to pursue legal action against Defen- dants within the appropriate statutory period to recover its clean up costs.
515 U.S. 1192Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025
Thus, the law is clear: claims over GHG emissions and climate change are governed exclusively by federal law and the Clean Air Act. … Air Act or such claims are now viable.
Petitioners Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2009
of the Clean Water Act, jointly defined the term after notice and comment. … and § 306 of the Clean Water Act.”
Reply Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017
PPG Industries, 446 U.S. 578 (1980), which addressed the Clean Air Act’s jurisdictional provi- sion. U.S. Br. 49. … Section 1369(b)(1), however, is far narrower than the Clean Air Act’s similar provi- sion. Whether it reaches the Rule is—at the least— debatable.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.