Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.38s
Appendix — Shore Club Condominium Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2005
initial period of the certification as beginning the date the Respondent begins to bargain in 4. … The only cleaning or maintenance function performed by the Employer’s security employees, is to clean occasional messes when no maintenance employee is on duty and to keep the security offices neat.
546 U.S. 820Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · May 22, 2026
After considering the Air Force’s permit-renewal application, Guam EPA published a draft permit and provided a 45-day public-comment period on the draft, as well as a public hearing. … After receiving the Air Force’s application, Guam EPA “held a public review and comment period * * * and hosted a public hearing.” Pet.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Feb 22, 2021
Accordingly, the question presented is: In order to qualify for a hardship exemption under §7545(o)(9)(B)(i) of the Clean Air Act, does a small refinery need to receive uninterrupted, continuous hardship … That is especially so because Congress knows how to incorporate time limits when it creates exemptions, and did so in other amendments to the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Brief — County Board of Arlington County v. Richards
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977
INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES Congress concluded in Section | of the Clean Air Act that “the growth in the amount and complexity of air pollution brought about by urbanization, industrial development … * * * The police power * * * is ample to lay out cones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.”
434 U.S. 5Amicus Brief — Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
Air Act; 42 U.S. … With respect to the Clean Air Act, Congress found specifically that urbanization has resulted in mounting dangers to public health and welfare, but that: “the prevention and control of air pollution
452 U.S. 264Opposition Brief — Trout v. Mabus (No. 08-1086)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Deleware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) ............00058, 12 Pruett v. Harris County Bail Bond Bd., 499 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 556 (1986) (attorney’s fees could be awarded for work during post-judgment proceedings if such work is “useful” and of a type “ordinarily
Record and brief — Deltona Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
.... 16 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … That Act was amended in 1977, and renamed the Clean Water Act.
455 U.S. 1017Reply Brief — Pilgrim Equipment Co. v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972
Acts 1969, 61st Leg., p. 133 ch. 45, emerg. eff. April 2, 1969.” … The business was dis- : rupted during this period, and to some extent thereafter.
409 U.S. 982Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Lung Ass’n, State of the Air 9 (2017), available at http?//www.lung.org/assets/documents/ healthy-air/state-of-the-air/state-of-the-air-2017.pdf. … Jd. at 41; see also National Ass’n for the Advancement of Colored People & Clean Air Task Force, Fumes Across the Fence-Line: The Health Im- pacts of Air Pollution from Oil and Gas Facilities 26 (
Reply Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 17, 2022
Finally, the Government professes to find support for its interpretative position in a surprising place: the Clean Air Act’s Acid Rain Program. U.S.Br.49; see also States.Br.26–27. … Respondents also attempt to draw a parallel with the Clean Air Act provision upheld against a nondelegation challenge in Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, 531 U.S. 457 (2001).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Brotherhood of Railway v. REA Express, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1972
Linde Air Prod- ucts Co., 336 U.S. 271 (1949) 16-17 a iii PAGE Order of Railway Conductors et al. v. Pitney et al., 326 U.S. 561 (1946) 11 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. … An order requiring restoration of the status quo rests on equitable considerations, including clean hands.
409 U.S. 892Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2021
Auto Innovators’ members rely on the regulatory certainty provided by the Clean Air Act to implement routine, model-wide updates to vehicles in production and in the field. … As the district court correctly recognized, the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) gives EPA exclusive authority to regulate these updates.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2019
A public comment period followed, during which the Department received many comments on the draft permit. … raise this issue during the public comment period.
Petition — Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Williams
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. … As a result of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, this section has been renumbered to 42 U.S.C. §7410 (Supp. 1977) (see Appendix G, infra). 5.
439 U.S. 865Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gerke Excavating, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
This is a 159-day period, 5% of which is 8 days. … See 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act provision mandating notice, comment and consideration in agency rule making). See also Reno v.
548 U.S. 901Appendix — Kinross Copper Corp. v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2000
In this case, the Clean Water Act and its clean water standards predated Kinross’ property interest in the unpatented mining claim. … On January 21, 1994, DEQ in a second memorandum to EQC made the following findings: “OAR 340-41-470(1) is more stringent than required by the Clean Water Act or federal rules because it prohibits
531 U.S. 960Application — BP P.L.C., et al., Applicants v. Rhode Island
Supreme Court brief · Application · Oct 7, 2019
See Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401(c) (Congressional statement that the goal of the Clean Air Act is “to encourage or otherwise promote reasonable Federal, State, and local governmental actions . . . … In addition, Plaintiff’s claims are preempted by the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
The legislature's response was the creation of Maryland's Statute 340 C.F.R. § 50.1(e), definition of ‘‘ambient air’’ under the Clear [sic] Air Act. CERCLA does not define this term. … Specifically, the district court held that the repose period of § 5-108(a) was not preempted by the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compen- sation Act of 1980 (““CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. § 9658
493 U.S. 1070Appendix D — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Appendix D · 2007
STATE/EPA COMMITMENTS The state and EPA will implement the Clean Air Act (CAA), and related state or federal regulations in a con- sistent manner throughout the regulated community. … Health Persp. 602 (2005).......... 10 Staff of Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works, 95th Cong., A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 (Comm.
549 U.S. 561Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 25, 2019
Cheroenhaka (Nottoway) Indian Tribe Mattaponi Indian Tribe Monacan Indian Nation Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act contains provisions to control common air pollutants, requires the United States Environmental … We find our decision is compliant with the Clean Air Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.