Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.80s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Castella v. Long
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Fund of the Departments of the Army and Air Force. … Byron Fetrou, and received approval to request food, laundry and dry-cleaning receipts from the Appellant (ME 23) G.
493 U.S. 936Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jenkins v. Missouri
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, __ U.S. __, ~ 106 S.Ct. 3088, CAPES Pc cccneseeoeesecédseedseoesere 37 Pennsylvania v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, __ U.S. _, 107 &.Ct. 30768, y= * 8 oo) ys reer passim - viii - Spell v.
488 U.S. 889Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Air Regulatory Group v. E.P.A., 573 U.S. 302, 324, citing Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 160 (2014). … The Court of Appeals’ decision upends that balance by holding that the general grant of power to regulate stationary sources of air pollution under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act gives the EPA near absolute
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 1, 2019
Since then, Congress has periodically amended the Act. … In March 2010, respondent and his wife, both members of the United States Air Force, were in the United Kingdom during a period of activeduty leave.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cooper v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
[42 USCA Section 6921] -. any toxic pollutant listed under Section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 USCA Section 7412], and (F) … Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 136S(a); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seg.; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601
510 U.S. 1117Jurisdictional Statement — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 2003
STUDY AND REPORT ON CLEAN MONEY CLEAN ELECTIONS LAWS. … (a) CLEAN MONEY CLEAN ELECTIONS DEFINED. — In this section, the term “clean money clean elections” means funds received under State laws that provide in whole or in part for the public financing of
539 U.S. 938Appendix B — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Appendix B · 2007
Since that time, ADEM has operated the PSD program in Alabama in lieu of the federal PSD program, as provided under the Clean Air Act. … This interpretation is based on the exclusions contained in the Alabama regulations and on the Clean Air Act.
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2024
All parties have received timely notification of the filing of this brief. 2 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT There are a lot of hard Clean Air Act (CAA) cases. This is not one of them. … The Clean Air Act divides judicial review of EPA actions into one of two general categories: Actions that are either nationally applicable or of nationwide effect go to the D.C.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Whether the Second Circuit erred by holding that §316(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED Section 316(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”) states: Any standard established pursuant to section 1311 of this
556 U.S. 208Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Rec. 33,696 (1976) .......................0.08. 4, 6, 22 Clean Air Act, Section 109(b), 42 U.S.C. § ES EIS ELSES STS AO RE 15, 16 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. ................. 1 Section … 1.3. 1315, 1318-19 & n.25 (1974); Lisa Heinzerling, The Clean Air Act and _ the Constitution, 20 St.
556 U.S. 208Appellants Brief — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 2003
During the period when all other corporations are muz- zled, media companies may air as many of their own electioneering communications as they wish. … You have clean money, clean elections. We can get at it in Minnesota, in Nevada.
539 U.S. 938Opposition Brief — Rye v. Seattle Times Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1984
During the period from 1973 to 1978, CAMP was the major anti-poverty agency operating in the Central Area of Seattle. 4. … Rye provided such comments until early 1978, but by March 1978 Rye would no longer provide me with comments. Rye made clear to me that I should not bother calling for further comments. 14.
469 U.S. 1087Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Beverly Zylstra, et vir, Petitioners v. DRV, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 5, 2021
The technician from Gabriel’s Maintenance took the valve gaskets out, cleaned the valve seals, cleaned the valve, had Mr. … This testimony goes to the issue of whether DRV or the Zylstras were responsible for paying for the sewage clean up; not whether DRV was willing or not willing to clean up the sewage (for a fee).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lewis B. Jones, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 15, 2022
Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. 8 Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., 522 U.S. 192, 201 (1997). … in the text of the limitations period.”
Transcript of Record — Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1932
A temperature of 106 over a period of days is very alarming. … the Jones Act.
287 U.S. 367Petition for Rehearing — Marvin v. Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie #200 (No. 08-657)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 2008
The Court makes no comment that the peti- tioner testified that the condenser was obstructing plaintiffs exit egress and petitioner had the nondel- egatable duty to remove the condenser unit. … We do have laws to protect Life and Safety ojr all our people, including 9-11-01 Terrorism Act; Pa-. triot Act; Hate Crimes; RICCO; and other laws, rulles and regulations.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
NYDEC, Clean Water Act Section 316(b), statement provided to U.S. … This approach, requiring preventive action in the face of uncertainty, is not a new one and is found not only in the Clean Water Act but in other environmental laws such as the Clean Air Act.
Respondents Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1992
The Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a) 33 U.S.C. § 1311 33 U.S.C. § 131 1a) 33 U.S.C. § 1342 The Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. §§ 7471-7473 Oklahoma Water Quality Standards (1982) … In contrast, Congress did plainly state such an exception in enacting the Clean Air Act which prohibits only “significant deteriorations” of air quality in “clean air areas”, with “significant” quantified
503 U.S. 91Opposition Brief — Meadowlake Corp. v. Ohio (No. 08-221)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Ohio 1985) (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, like Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, imposes strict liability because Congress made intent irrelevant to the question of civil penalties); State … June 1, 1990) (finding that a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day under the Clean Air Act does not violate the Excessive Fines Clause, even where an administrative penalty was imposed in an earlier
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Jul 9, 2018
“Do not clean chips from the surface of machines with compressed air or with hands. A brush or hook should be used.” . . . “The cleaning of one’s clothes with compressed air is prohibited.” . . . … “Compressed Air. Compressed air shall never be blown towards anyone, used for cleaning of personal clothing, or used to cool a person off.” 39.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.