Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.43s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Urban Plumbing & Heating Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
The defendant delayed the appointment of the AE for a period of time. … tives knew extra costs would be incurred by the performance period. The local representative con.
398 U.S. 958Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 18, 2023
Air Act Rulemaking Process, 86 Fed. … Reg. 26,406 (May 14, 2021) (rescinding rule governing cost-benefit analyses under Clean Air Act); • Removal of International Entrepreneur Parole Program, 86 Fed.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
ree 8) reas ees i ects -. 14 ; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q CRSOUD 68 ert biel ee ica 3 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y (1994) ......... passim … Like the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q (1994), a regulatory provision of which is at issue in Hoechst, FIFRA is administered by EPA.
524 U.S. 952Appendix — Broadview Chemical Corp. v. Loctite Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1969
In Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. … Petitioner alleges a conflict of circuits between the decisions in Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v.
394 U.S. 976Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
The Tenth Circuit addressed Section 7545(o)(9) of the Clean Air Act in which Congress provided small refineries a “temporary exemption” from being obligated parties. … Because the three exemptions before the court involved refineries that “sought to renew or restart their exemptions in 2016 or 2017,” the Tenth Circuit held that the Clean Air Act “did not authorize the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chandler v. Roche
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
That time in the Army Air Force and Air Force Reserve started in the 1954 Act is a false assumption... The Appeals Court also agreed that the District Court and BCMR were wrong on both items. … He was in the Army Air Force and the U.S. Air Force for 21 years 7 months and 14 days, with a clean record. How can the Appeal Court let the BCMR deny him the correction mandated by Congress?
540 U.S. 1050Petition for Writ of Certiorari — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 27, 2018
Air Act because it expanded federal jurisdiction to “millions” of sources that previously did not require permits under the Clean Air Act. … Second, the Ninth Circuit’s expansion of NPDES point source permitting is akin to the expansion of Clean Air Act permitting this Court reversed in UARG.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1991
By removing women rather than cleaning up the workplace, the employer is violating their equal rights to a reproductively safe work environment under the Occu- pational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C … Compressed air may not be used on any surface where lead accumulates. b. Vacuuming or washing are the accepted methods for cleaning.
499 U.S. 187Opposition Brief — Gondeck v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965
The same comment is applicable to the other Trav- elers Insurance Company v. O’Hearn case. The State cases that are cited by Petitioner are: Lamm v. … The same procedure was to be followed thereafter, except that the work periods were to be for three (3) months and the leave periods to be fourteen (14) days.
382 U.S. 25Brief in Opposition — Pawnee Indian Tribe v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition · 1962
report. to Patrick “Air … The same proceduré was to be_ followed thereafter, except that the work periods were : to be for three (3) months and the leave periods to be fourteen (14) days.
370 U.S. 918Joint Appendix — Dole v. Steelworkers
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1990
OSHA there- fore established a sixty-day comment period on the final rule to permit interested parties to provide data or evidence regarding the feasibility or practicality of the pro- visions of the … A 60 day period was established for such comments, and it ended on October 23, 1987.
494 U.S. 26Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 26, 2025
Code §25000.5(a) (West) ................... 11 Clean Air Act ............................................. 2, 12, 14, 19 Clean Water Act .................................................. 12, 15 Tex. … Clean Water Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2023
Delta Air Lines. Inc., 239 F.3d 456,466 (2d Cir. 2001). … were made within the limitations period.
Memorandum — United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1991
the Clean Water Act … Those cases held that the federal facilities provisions of the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act did not waive federal] sovereign immunity from state permit requirements.
500 U.S. 951Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
water and rely upon the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq.) … (emphasis added); EPA, Response to Comments – Topic 10 Legal Analysis, at 386 (June 30, 2015) (“EPA agrees that the agency has a longstanding and consistent interpretation that the Clean Water Act may
Opposition Brief — Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Comite Pro Rescate de la Salud
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
. = 0. cence 15 Clean Air Act, 4 USC. G6 7401 Of 604......5 0 2ku ccs 2 40 CER. BBRR. … . §§ 1251 et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. and the permitting and other regulatory requirements of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6922, 6924, 6925 and 6930.
494 U.S. 1029Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
Air Quality As with water quality, applicants would ordinarily 9 be required to ensure El Centro Project 1 conforms with California’s air quality standards by complying with the federal Clean Air Act … Clean Water Act, Dunn Decl. ¶¶ 18-19.
Transcript of Record — St. Anthony Church v. PENNA. RR
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1915
, but at regular periods. … Very short period of time. Q.
237 U.S. 575Opposition Brief — Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Carson-Truckee Water Conservancy District
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
appropriate” standard as used in the attorney’s fee provisions of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f), the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 2618(d), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, … The EPA, like the Secretary in this case, was actively enforcing the Clean Air Act.
471 U.S. 1065Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'n v. Westchester Fire Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
(citations omitted) "When an act is continuous and all the time tortious and wrongful, it should not be exempted from such classification as an accident be- cause it extends for a iong period of … As the sand disintegrates, acting as an abrasive to clean the surface, a clo®&d of finely 25 fragmented sand called free Silica or Silicon dioxide is produced.
419 U.S. 1070
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.