Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Senator Muskie at that time was Chairman of the Senate Subcom- mittee on Air and Water Pollution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act. … Senator Muskie asked the Senate the following crucial questions regarding the high costs of attain- ing clean water and then gave the following answers: Can we afford clean water?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Frey v. Reilly

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the entire panoply of 24 environmental laws. … Plaintiffs allege that in acting to clean up ploychlorinated bipheny!

Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, IN c., Respondent. … Senator Muskie at that time was Chairman of the Senate Subcom- mittee on Air and Water Pollution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act.

Reply Brief — City of New York v. Eastway Construction Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1987

Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, U.S. , 106 S. Ct. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, U.S. : 106 S. Ct. 3088, 3098, (1986): We further refined our views in Blum_y. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 104 S.Ct. 1541, 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984).

Supplemental Brief — Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. Pakoototas (No. 06-1188)

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2006

Cal. 2006) (In a Clean Air Act case, the effect of compliance-and closure of a facility on civil penalties claims in a citizen suit was a “disputed factual matter”); Natural Res. Council of Me. v. … Me. 2006) (In a Clean Water Act case, the court noted that at an early stage of litigation, “without any further information,” it could not determine whether civil penalties claims had become moot)

Transcript of Record — Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1923

- vent pipe at the top to keep the bearings clean by air pressure to force out spent fluid, the cas- ine to be maintained as an “air-tight chamber” to be “kept filled” with clean liquid. … In order to make the compressed air effective in clean- ing out the casing, it was deemed necessary to make the casing air-tight during such cleaning operation, which would necessarily be performed

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adams v. Union Carbide Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984

The chief danger of TDI, however, lies in exposure to its fumes, which act as a severe respiratory irritant. … The relatively short period after the Fi 4 meeting. The relatively short period of time, elapeing before te . AS 2 ee Tee Se nion Carbide’s product.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

The Notices of Intent to Sue inform industry members that they are in violation of the Clean Water Act and have 60 days to comply. … Therefore, the Association has a direct interest in this case that puts at issue the scope of citizen suits under the Clean Water Act.

Reply Brief — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

EPA, 902 F.2d i er ee ous ede eh ake ek awake ee ea 3 STATUTES Clean Air Act § 107, 42 U.S.C. § 7407.............. 7,9 Clean Air Act § 109, 42 U.S.C. § 7409........... ome he Coogee Bee Act & 172 … To the contrary, the Subpart 2 question is itself a question of law - 1.e., of the proper interpretation of the Clean Air Act.

Reply Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004

SECTION 209(a) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT PLAINLY PREEMPTS THE FLEET RULES........ 2 Il. … Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Exxon Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

Whether the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency can lawfully promulgate control mea- sures in a substitute implementation plan under Section 110(c) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § … BLEED THROUGH —_* sa 3 ated by Respondent Environmental Protection Agency on November 6, 1973 pursuant to Sections 110(a)(2) and 110(c) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 84 Stat. 1680, 42 U.S.C.

Opposition Brief — Bishop Processing Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970

Petitioner’s dilatory tactics contributed sub- stantially to the long delays encountered in bringing these proceedings under the Clean Air Act to ulti- mate resolution. … It was the inability of the Delaware authorities to obtain relief under state law that prompted the request for federal proceedings under the Clean Air Act, resulting in this suit.

Reply Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 18, 2025

See Br. 43. 14 words in the Clean Air Act different, statutory context matters, too. Perhaps in other statutes or cases any intermediate “but-for” reason will do. … After all, the Clean Air Act assigns States primary responsibility for managing air quality and affords States significant flexibility in how they satisfy that obligation. Br. 4-5, 45-46.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Baykeeper, No. 09-547. 4 Clean Water Act,” EPA Mot. for Stay of Mandate at 9 (reproduced at Pet. App. 122a). … deposition (although they are al- ready subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act), for the dispensing of road salt, for the application of domestic fertilizers, and for the use of many other

Appendix — Horn v. Cia de Navegacion Fruco, S. A.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1969

The air being delivered into both holds generally steadied at an appropriate 52 degrees within the 8-hour period. … The air being delivered into both holds generally steadied at an appropriate 52 degrees within the 8-hour period.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Neira v. Bandera County Fresh Water Supply District No. 1

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

AIR & WATER ASSOCIATION: REGIONAL CLEAN AIR AND WATER ASSOCIATION PO BOX 6949 SAN ANTONIO, TX 7820 March 25, 1998 TO: SUPREME COURTS OF TEXAS AND THE UNITED STATES The purpose of this letter is … s/Han Helland Hans Helland, President Regional Clean Air and Water Association Rudy Neira, Pro Se

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schulz v. New York State Executive

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

an Act “in relation to the implementation of the Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act of 1996.” … Water/Clean Air Bond Act, was rejected.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abuan v. General Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

One individual we spoke with told us that cleaning the overhead crane was particularly dirty work. To Clean the crane, workers built a scaffold. … Comment, Toxic Torts and Latent Diseases: The Case for an Increased Risk Cause of Action, 38 U.KAN.L.REV. 1087 (1990).

Brief in Opposition — Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition · 1970

The Act requires that within ten days a tinge and place for conference be set, and that the first conference be held lias the 30- day period. … Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 169 F.Supp. 777, 794 (S.D.N.Y. 1958).

Amicus Curiae Brief — ExxonMobil Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Incorporated, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2025

Air Act (“CAA”) and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and its state counterparts—including the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”). … See Abell, Ignoring the Trees for the Forests: How the Citizen Suit Provision of the Clean Water Act Violates the Constitution’s Separation of Powers Principle, 81 VA. L. REV. 1957, 1964 (1995).