Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.16s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … “[I]t’s clear that too many lawmakers have abdicated, thus the pressure to tackle the climate issue through existing regulations like the Clean Air Act, and through the courts.
Amicus Curiae Brief — North Dakota, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2021
With this recently discovered power, EPA is now authorized to set regulations far out of the bounds set by Congress in the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), imposing tremendous expense and undue uncertainty on rural … Instead, “the Clean Air Act displaces federal common law” and “when Congress addresses a question . . . the need for such an unusual exercise of law-making by federal courts disappears.”
Appendix — Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
NHTSA is not writing on a clean slate; it cannot suggest that the congressiona! actions and failures to act described above have no bear- ing on the agency’s freedom to regulate on this question. … Air Act.
463 U.S. 29Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
Ct. 2172, 2176-2181 (2021) (examining meaning of the term “extension” in provision of Clean Air Act allowing small refineries to petition EPA for extension of hardship exemption from renewable fuel program … Circuit deferred to EPA’s refusal to consider the costs of a Clean Air Act emissions regulation that was statutorily required to be “appropriate and necessary”), reversed, Michigan v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 1, 2026
(b) Reduced period for clean record (1) Clean record. … registration, the period during which the clean record shall be maintained is 25 years
Opposition — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857c-6. 2. … STATEMENT Section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. 1857c-6(b), re- quires the EPA Administrator to publish a list of categories of significant stationary
423 U.S. 1025Appendix — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2009
Petitioners here challenge a rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“the EPA” or “the Agency”) pursuant to section 3i6(b) of the Clean Water Act (““CWA” or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § … Nonattainment areas are identified for “criteria pollutants” established under the 1970 Amendments to the Clean Air Act that do not meet standards set by EPA.
556 U.S. 208Opposition Brief — United Nuclear Corp. v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Act of 1970, 29 a Cae A. … The amount of radon gas released into the air remains constant for many thousands of years—essentially indefinitely.
476 U.S. 1158Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. v. Lyon
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1955
There was no ‘‘period of invalidity” of the Lyon patent prior to the 1952 Act as assumed by Question No. 2 of the petition. … Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, 274, 275; 93 L.
350 U.S. 911Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent Myra Brown, et al. · Dec 7, 2022
period.” … But that provision similarly excuses notice-and15 comment only for the actions “authorized” in the prior section. Id. §1098bb(a)(1)-(2); see Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Salazar v. Whink Products Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
as the Commission shall specify in the notice (which period shall not be less than 30 days or more than 60 days after the date of publication of the notice), comments with respect to the risk of … (C) A summary of any significant issues raised by the comments submitted during the public comment period in response to the pre- liminary regulatory analysis, and a summary of the assessment by the
514 U.S. 1004Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steele v. Beltrami County (No. 07-334)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
(d) “Proprietor” has the meaning specified by the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act Rules, Minnesota Rules, part 4620.0 100, subd. 13, as amended from time to time. … - 3] - This ordinance is intended to complement and go beyond the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, Minnesota Statutes §§ 144.411 to 144.417, as amended from time to time.
Respondents Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1991
Clean Air Act. … The legal memo- randum drew a distinction between the Clean Air Act, which prohibited only “significant” deterioration, and the Clean Water Act, where no degradation meant no new point source discharges
499 U.S. 946Opposition Brief — Blau v. Lamb
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1967
Exchange Commission has now . .adopted a rule exempting from Section 16(b) all similar, | , transactions after. the effective date of the rule. . (2) With respect to the second question, no clean 3 … _. eorporations controlled by them, exchanged an aggrégate of - 199,245 shares of Lamb Industries Common for an aggre- gate of 39, 849 shares of Air-Way Preferred during the period of July through
385 U.S. 1002Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Acmat Corp. v. School District of Philadelphia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
of God, acts or neglect of the School District, acts or neglect of any other contractor, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, or freight embargoes, the period herein-above specified … Contract costs for air monitors during the same period, $87,000, and the costs of busing Rush students to other schools, $446,716.
498 U.S. 1024Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 25, 2023
Air Act. … (NEPA), Clean Air Act state 44a implementation plans, and federal highway administration actions.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1986
Section 406 of that Act amends Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1345(d), the meaning of which | is the subject of the two petitions. … , 5a part C of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, or the Clean Air Act, or under State permit programs approved by the Admin- istrator, where
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 3, 2021
Cir. 2021) ...................... 5-9 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … As to where, it stated that both air pollution prevention and air pollution control should take place specifically “at its source”: The Congress finds— … (3) that air pollution prevention (that is, the
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Whether the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency can lawfully promulgate control mea- sures in a substitute implementation plan under Section 110(c) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § … Whether the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has statutory authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate vapor emissions from ships and barges despite Congress’ deliberate deletion
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Duke Bradford, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Labor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 28, 2024
Agency, 427 U.S. 246, 261–63 (1976) (holding that a provision of the Clean Air Act (CAA) authorized states to issue emissions regulations that are “more stringent” than national standards). … The agency may rely on comments submitted during the notice and comment period as justification for the rule, so long as the submissions are examined critically. See Am. Great Lakes Ports Ass’n v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.