Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.45s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    The Clean Air Act (the “Act”) places primary responsibility for achieving clean air upon the states. … As explained by Judge Tatel in dissent, joined by Chief Judge Edwards and Judge Garland, “the Clean Air Act’s requirement that EPA set air quality standards ‘requisite to protect public health’ with

    532 U.S. 901
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

    This conclusion was based upon Section 306 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which provides that: For a period of 2 years after the date of the enact- ment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of … Clean Air Act Amendments, Pub. L. No. 101-549, § 306, 104 Stat. 2399, 2584 (1990).

    504 U.S. 906
  • Reply Brief — TENNESSEE V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (No. 75-787)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975

    (2) The Legislative History of Subsequent Amendments to the Clean Air Act Does Not Support EPA's Position. … This provision was enacted as section 119 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857c-10 (Supp. IV, 1974).

  • Transcript of Record — Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1944

    PX 534 describes the Martinez unit and comments on the Halloran-Strout unit, bring- — ing out that the Dubbs people realized. the value of _ keeping clean stock in the tubes. . 883 In PX 534, under … ‘period.

    322 U.S. 471
  • Opposition — Outboard Marine Corp. v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    (Clean Water Act). 514 F.2d at 532. … order established under the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C

    453 U.S. 917
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Antonio M. Smith, Petitioner v. John Kind, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 30, 2026

    Finally, it provides: “(b) While an inmate is acting in a disruptive manner, the institution shall maintain close control of all property in subd. (a) 1. [Clean mattress], 5. [Clothing], and 6. … a clean cell.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. LTV Corp., 113 S. Ct. 661 (1992) (No. 92-732)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Feb. 20, The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (“ADEM”) has been delegated and designated as the authorized state agency responsible for enforcement of: (1) the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 … U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., as amended; (2) the Federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., as amended; and (3) the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3251 et seq., as amended, and including 42

  • Amicus Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976

    Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857e-5 ....... 28 Section 111, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857¢e-6 ....... 27 Section 13, Refuse Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 407 ....... 7 CONGRESSIONAL MATERIALS: Senate Committee … structural and terminological similarities between the Clean Air Act and the 1972 Water Pollution Control Act Amendments’’).

    426 U.S. 947
  • Opposition Brief — CED'S, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    Air Act. … Air Act (Pet.

    471 U.S. 1015
  • Opposition — Save The Bay, Inc. v. United States Corps of Engineers

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    Since the case of Citi- zen’s for Clean Air, Inc. v. U.S. Corps of Engineers et al., 349 F.Supp. 696 (S.D. … Hawaiian Electric Com- pany, Inc., supra, and Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. et al. v.

    449 U.S. 900
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smiland Paint Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

    Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has nondiscretionary duties under Section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act (the “AA ), 42 USC. … Shep Melnick, Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act (Brookings Inst. 1983) at 365.

    525 U.S. 812
  • Respondents Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2009

    American Trucking, in determining whether Congress intended to authorize EPA to consider compliance costs in establishing air quality standards under the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act in American Trucking did not have to provide expressly that EPA could not consider costs in establishing national ambient air quality standards for the Act to have a plain meaning

    556 U.S. 208
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Northern Plains Resource Council

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983

    DO, 34) Pee UE ioc os eee tes 2 Statute: Clean Air Act of 1977, Section 307(f), 42 U.S.C. (Supp. … App. la-4a) holding the Environmental Protection Agency liable for attorneys’ fees under Section 307(f) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (Supp. V) 7607(f).

    464 U.S. 806
  • Opposition Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

    Whether EPA correctly determined that the Clean Air Act does not in any event give it authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions for the purpose of addressing concerns about global climate change … Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    549 U.S. 497
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Islander East East Pipeline Pipeline Co., LLC v. McCarthy (No. 08-367)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    In addition to the Clean Water Act, the Natural Gas Act of 1938 is also applicable to this matter. Jd., 525 F.3d at 143. … FERC to permit natural gas pipelines, the legality of that decision must be determined in light of two laws—the Clean Water Act and the Natural Gas Act.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 20, 2018

    Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) creates a narrow carve-out from FERC’s otherwise-exclusive authority. … Second, the agency prepares a 2 The NGA also preserves States’ authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act and the Clean Air Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d)(1)–(2), which are not at issue here. 3 Agencies

  • Supplemental Appendix — Bazor v. Boomtown Belle Casino

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 2003

    A permanent disability is one which has continued for a lengthy period and is of lasting or indefinite duration, as distinguished from one in which recovery merely awaits a normal healing period. … Employer/Carrier shall pay Claimant's widow the annual compensation benefit increase pursuant to Section 910(f) of the Act effective July 13, 1994, for the applicable period of permanent total disability

    540 U.S. 814
  • Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

    First, Congress could easily have inserted—but did not—a “catch-all” provision for any “final action taken” by the Administrator, as it did in a similar judicial review provision in the Clean Air Act … Reg. 37,054, 37,055 (June 29, 2015) (citing 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314, 1321, 1342, 1344, and 1361 as providing the authority for the Clean Water Rule). 16 review provision in the Clean Air Act (“CAA”),

  • Respondents Brief — Utility Water Water Act Group Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (Nos. 07-597, 07-588, 07-589)

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2009

    American Trucking, in determining whether Congress intended to authorize EPA to consider compliance costs in establishing air quality standards under the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act in American Trucking did not have to provide expressly that EPA could not consider costs in establishing national ambient air quality standards for the Act to have a plain meaning

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022

    Many industries in which the Chamber’s members operate are regularly confronted by issues concerning the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act) and are adversely affected by the uncertain reach … Last Term, for example, the majority and the dissent in HollyFrontier found very little common ground in a dispute over the meaning of a part of the Clean Air Act.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.