Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.27s
Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 2, 2022
Cohen, 402 U.S., at 24. … Id., at 24.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE LOUISIANA, v. Appellant, PHILLIP CALLAIS, ET AL., Appellees. PRESS ROBINSON, ET AL., Appellants, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, ET AL., Appellees. … See id. at 23–24.
Respondents Brief — Tull v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1987
The remedy created by the Clean Water Act is equitable 24 C. … Kansas, 123 U.S 23 11, 20, — 23, 24, 37 O’Connor v. Cook, 6 Ves. ton 665, aff’d, 8 Ves. Jun. 536 " ST FT eR ene 23 Parklane Hosiery Co." V. Shove. 439 U.S. 399 15 16. 10, 42 Parsons V.
481 U.S. 412Petitioners Brief — Watts v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970), recognized the safeguards of having the declarant at trial. … Green, 399 U.S. at 176 (Harlan, J., concurring).
405 U.S. 1043Opposition — Penoli v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).
440 U.S. 945Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).
414 U.S. 1040Petitioners Brief — United States v. Mitchell
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399, quoting United States v. … Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399-400.
445 U.S. 535Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1966
Ce. . 1952), certified question dismissed, 344 U.S. 4 (1952)“.... 24 CAB v.-Delta Air Lines, 367 US. 316 (196K) | oi. 6s 12, 17, 24, 25 Capitot Airways v. CAB, 292 ¥'.2d 755 (D.C. … Another provision of Part 399, § 399.33 _ (a), sets forth the ecmdatiindi, ‘ander which the Board allows off- , pak reduced fares.
385 U.S. 843Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1981
See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. … "In his dissent, Justice Black complained of the majority's departure from Ecker. 399 U.S. at 499.
450 U.S. 908Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Nov 20, 2017
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).1 Racially polarized voting is significant in Nueces County but insignificant in Travis County. … “[W]illfully ignor[ing] those who pointed out deficiencies,” id. 45a n.46, including its own attorney, the legislature ratified Plan C235 on June 24, 2013. I.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956
A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.
352 U.S. 846Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.
419 U.S. 843Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020
See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.
Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025
Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.
Reply Brief — Ronell Moses, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2025
No. 25-399 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONELL MOSES, JR., PETITIONER v. … Br. at 24 n.8, Jardines, supra (No. 11-564). But the Court flatly rejected that contention.
Respondents Brief — Gerard A. Sheridan, Petitioner v. Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018
Dist. of Cal., 806 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1986) .............................. 24 Brat v. Personhuballah, 883 F.3d 475 (4th Cir. 2018) …………………. 26, 27 Charles v. … Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (1910) .............................................. 24 McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017) .......................................... 24 Melendres v. Arpaio, 989 F.
Petitioners Brief — Muniz v. Hoffman
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1975
New York, 399 U.S. 166 (1970) ............ 5 £5 60ee $44 bbs aed se eee eee 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20 Banks y. Grain Trimmers Ass’n, 390 U.S. 459 (1968) ..... 24 Blankenship v. … Baldwin, 399 U.S. 66, 70.
422 U.S. 454Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 12, 2024
Sept. 24, 2024). … App. 38a & n.24.
Opposition — Avcollie v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Lynch, 79 N.J. 327, 399 A. 2d 629 (1979) ........ 8 INDEX IN THE Page Supreme Court of the Gnited States OS. v. Aisisot, S35 B.. 20. … J. 327, 399 A. 2d 629, 635-636 (1979); People v. Leach, 57 A.D. 2d 332, 394 N.Y.S. 2d 722 (N.Y. Supreme Court App. Div. 2nd.
444 U.S. 1015Petition — Vance v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69-70 (1970). Clearly, New Jersey considers the drinking-driver to be a threat of first magnitude and has legislated ac- cordingly. … Ct. 593, 24 L.Ed.2d 514 (1970). Compare Muniz v. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, National Labor Relations Board, — U.S. —, 45 L.Ed.2d 319, 95 S. Ct. — (1975).
426 U.S. 935
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.