Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.46s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Const.: Bat, TE ccocnsynessceseqeemaenseeneieeen 17 gh, TE. csusewsnenasemeseainn 8, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Tit. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 560 (1986).
523 U.S. 83Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 30, 2019
Statutory Authority Statutory authority for this action comes from section 211 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545. … Statutory Authority Statutory authority for this action comes from section 211 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Michael Kuczewski, Petitioner v. Robin Marien, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 22, 2024
Robin Marien, Gabriel Jebb, Air California Adventure Inc., Respondents. … Who could say whether a famous actor pursued their acting profession for fame or simply for the love of acting?
Respondents Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 18, 2022
L. 88-206, 77 Stat. 392; Air 6 Quality Act of 1967, Pub. L. 90-148, 81 Stat. 485; Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … L. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 19, 2026
The Clean Air Act’s savings clauses, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7416 and 7604(e), are materially parallel to the Clean Water Act savings clauses at issue in Ouellette. See City of New York v. … The majority agreed that the claims are displaced by federal common law, that any federal common law is in turn displaced by the Clean Air Act under AEP, and that the Clean Air Act’s savings clauses do
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2014
Ct. at 1598 (addressing an EPA rule promulgated under the Clean Air Act); Massachusetts v. … EPA could consider costs when setting national ambient air quality standards under § 7409(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act); Gen.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1997
Preven- tative maintenance include but is not limited to the following things: (a) Scheduled checking, adjusting, cleaning and lubricating of air con- ditioning, heating and other equip- ment such … This includes checking and correct- ing the cathodic protection system, and periodic checking of under- ground lines for leaks.
522 U.S. 865Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae · 1959
. £2 _Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ ‘Casnpeasetion , Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C. 901_.--..- 2 o- 21 Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act), 41 Stat. -' 988, 1007, 46 U.S. … air and lie down near the bilges.
358 U.S. 613Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
No. 91- SC, Ti ntecineniniettrerenmenieimeenrteieneel 2,3 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … The Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, Pub. L.
540 U.S. 461Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
If you have any questions of comments, please don't hesitate to cootact me. … Thus, CO: is not a pollutant, and is not, and should not, be regulated under any part of the Clean Air Act nor under any air pollution section of 40 CFR.
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
The Clean Air Act leaves no room for a state-law claim about out-of-state, crossborder emissions. … Much like the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act leaves room for state-common-law actions only where the claim concerns an “in-state source of pollution.” Bell v.
Record and brief — William E. Clements, Appellant, vs. The Odorless Excavating Apparatus Company
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1883
way from the way they are combined and act in the Bull Patent. … In this contrivance the pump acts as a lift and force-pump, and the fecal matters pass through it. In Bull’s apparatus the pump is an air-pump, and no fecal matter ever enters it.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carruthers v. Duran
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Be On Le eee wt 5, 8-9, 10 Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S. Ct. 3088 (1986), and Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 107 S. Ct. 8078 (1987).
486 U.S. 1046Appendix for Appellee — Parks-Cramer Co. v. American Monorail Co. (No. 533)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix for Appellee · 1957
Mills, of Spray and ‘Leaksville, North Carolina, for a period ‘of approximately five years. … Thereafter, I was em- + ployed by the Dan River Mills, of Danville; Virginia, for a period of approximately a year and a half.
Reply Brief — Louisville Edible Oil Products, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991
Abowmoussallem, 726 F.2d at 910 n.2. 5 standards promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air Act. … States gua states have no authority to implement and enforce standards under the Clean Air Act.
502 U.S. 859Appendices — Hansen v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2002
per cubic meter of air. … Taylor are persons for purposes of the Clean Water Act.
535 U.S. 1111Opposition Brief — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Cir. 1990)... 5 STATUTES Clean Air Act § 307(d) (9), 42 U.S.C. § 7607 RID ssusinnstininicictsiisssotinniiietniatnhinnightinndiginn RI Be SED seiecsincccnesnensteninpcniinbitsdamiiiaiiimiaaitiemindeina … Wolff, Chair, Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, to Hon. Carol M.
532 U.S. 901Opposition — Marine Development Corp. v. Heiman
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
In that case plaintiff was seri- ously injured as a result of working with asbestos over a long period of time. … Commenting that the old case of McPherson v.
429 U.S. 869Appendix — City of Portland v. Northwest Environmental Advocates
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1996
PROF App-31 Clean Air Act (“CAA”) provision that applies to air pollution permit conditions.? Id. at 3745. … Air Act (“CAA”) provision that applies to air pollution permit conditions
518 U.S. 1018Petitioners Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Dec 13, 2024
The Clean Air Act centers on the “‘core principle’ of cooperative federalism.” EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 572 U.S. 489, 511 n.14 (2014). … The Clean Air Act’s venue provision reinforces this balance between national standards and local implementation.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.