Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

1.82s

  • Lawson, Charles v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

    2021 TN WC App. 89 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 27, 2021

    Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004); Majors v. Randstad Inhouse Servs., L.P., No. M2010-01975-WC-R3-WC, 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 970, at *10 (Tenn. Worker’s Comp. Panel Oct. 19, 2011). … State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Tenn. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knox County v. Fox

    107 Tenn. 724 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1901

    In the case of Knox v. … The cost of boarding prisoners and turnkey’s fees are properly chargeable in these misdemeanor cases to the county and not to the prisoner.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Odell Binkley v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 1, 2011

    Worrall v. Kroger Co., 545 S.W.2d 736, 738 (Tenn. 1977). … Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp., 308 S.W.3d 843, 852 (Tenn. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eddie Wayne Gordon v. State of Tennessee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 4, 2006

    Brown, District Attorney General; and Elaine Todd, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. … However, the petitioner testified that he may have lied to the parole board because he was trying to get out of prison.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abdelshahaed, Reazkallah v. Taylor Farms

    2021 TN WC App. 58 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 27, 2021

    Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Exxon Corp. v. Metro Gov't

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 24, 2001

    Austin v. Memphis Pub. Co., 655 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tenn. 1983). … Metro Beer Board cites several cases in which ‘location’ has referred to the building in which beer was sold. See generally, Bostic v. Board of Comm’rs, 1992 WL 62013, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. March 31, 1992); Lones v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akin v. MacKie

    203 Tenn. 113 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1958

    State v. Mitchell, 104 Tenn. 336 , 58 S.W. 365 ; State v. Allstadt, 166 Tenn. 349 , 61 S.W.2d 473 , 62 S.W.2d 566 ; and Boyd v. … See McCampbell v. Fountain Head Railroad Co., 111 Tenn. 55 , at page 68, 77 S.W. 1070 , 102 Am.St.Rep. 731 , citing Hawes v. City of Oakland, 104 U.S. 450 , 26 L.Ed. 827 ; City of Detroit v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Green

    995 S.W.2d 591 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1998

    Emphasizing the factor concerning outside contacts or influence on the jury is the Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. Brown, 323 N.E.2d 902 (Mass. 1975). … See, e.g., Edwards, 552 P.2d at 1098 ; Brown, 323 N.E .2d at 904 -05; People v. McNeeley, 575 N.E.2d 926, 929 (Ill. App. Ct. 1991).

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Southern Railway Co. v. State

    141 Tenn. 133 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1918

    State v. Railroad , 91 Tenn., 445 , 19 S. W., 229 ; L. & N. Railroad Co. v. State, 3 Head, 523 , 75 Am. Dec., 778 . In which case the indictment must conclude “to the-common nuisance.” Gaines v. … Be it further enacted, that the board of mayor and aldermen of any incorporated city shall be guilty of a nuisance under the present existing laws of the State, if they permit any of the foregoing offenses named in the first

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Valley v. Lambuth

    1 Tenn. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 24, 1925

    Tn Finlay v. Brown, supra, it is further stated: . … Brown, 122 Tenn., is distinguished from the case of Cole v. Taylor, 132 Tenn., In Cole v. Taylor, referring to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Finlay v. Brown, the court say: “The opinion of this court in Finlay v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Superior Oil, Inc.

    875 S.W.2d 658 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1994

    This Court in Foute v. … State v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Johnny J. Crass, Jr. v. State of Tn Bd. of Claims

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 18, 1999

    See Coffman v. City of Pulaski, 220 Tenn. 642, 422 S.W. 2d. 429 (Tenn. 1967); Watson v. Tenn. Dept. of Correction, 970 S.W. 2d 494 (Tenn. App. 1998); Crowe v. John W. Harton Mem. Hosp., 579 S.W. 2d 888 (Tenn. … As explained by our Supreme Court in Shell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evelyn Logue v. Shelbyville Housing Authority

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 1, 2001

    Bringle v. Methodist Hosp., 701 S.W.2d 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985); Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 395 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981). … Nelson v. Martin, 958 S.W.2d 643 (Tenn. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Embry's Administrator v. Sims

    60 Tenn. 377 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1872

    Sims kept her hotel open for the purposes of general entertainment as a tavern, and also for boarding all who might apply therefor until January, 1864, and that she boarded all persons sent *380 to her by Embry, in compliance … The case of Smith v. Corn, for use, etc., 3 Head, 117 , was this: A .writing was made by Smith, as follows: “ Due Thomas K.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Evans

    8 Tenn. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 1928

    It is the insistence of the defendant that where usury appears upon the face of the note sued on, usury need not be pleaded' (citing Richardson v. Brown, 68 Tenn., 242 ; Bang v. Windmill Co., 96 Tenn., 365 ). … But this holding- has been expressly disapproved in Richardson v. Brown, 9 Baxter, 242 -249, as not in harmony with our laws defining usury.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Epps v. Washington County

    173 Tenn. 373 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1938

    The power of the quarterly court to employ counsel is limited by statutes which have been construed and applied in the cases of Holtzclaw v. Hamilton County, 101 Tenn., 338 , 47 S. W., 421 ; McHenderson v. … W., 1016 ; State ex rel. v. True, 116 Tenn., 294, 313 , 95 S. W., 1028 . See State v. Turnpike Co., 151 Tenn., 150 , 268 S. W., 627 ; Code, sections 739 and 1059.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Tony Ladd Meeks

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 9, 2016

    That change was in response to our supreme court’s decision in State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015). … The Appellant acknowledges the Brown decision in his brief on appeal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lella Yvonne Graham v. CHI Memorial Healthcare System

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2025

    Michael Czarnecki, a board-certified pulmonologist. Dr. … In her brief on appeal, Employee relies on Goins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Shelby County, Tennessee

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 12, 2024

    (ECF No. 43-21 at PageID 758 (Brown email).) Kmet forwarded Suttle’s updated report to Brown eleven minutes later, stating “FYI — I haven’t reviewed yet.” … I–V (2018).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lineberger v. State Ex Rel. Beeler

    174 Tenn. 538 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1939

    R., 408; Cumberland University v. Golladay, 152 Tenn., 82 , 274 S. W., 536 ; State v. Columbia, Godwin & Santa Fe Turnpike Company, 133 Tenn., 446 , 181 S. W., 682 ; Stratton Claimants v. … A., 70; McKinney v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.