Case law

State v. Downey

259 S.W.3d 723 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2008

Brown met the victim, Charlie Rye, who was James Rye’s father. On the night of April 11, 2001, Ms. Brown approached the defendant about the possibility of robbing the victim. … Brown drove the defendant and Mr. Green to the victim’s residence. Ms. Brown remained in the vehicle while the two men went into the home. The defendant was carrying a red metal flashlight with him.

Marcella J. Cheek v. Margaret Culpepper, Commissioner of Employment Security and Galen Internal Medicine Group, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 30, 1997

See: Humana of Tennessee v. Tennessee Health Facilities Commission, et al., 551 S.W.2d 664 (Tenn. 1977); De Priest v. Puett, 669 S.W.2d 669 (Tenn. App. 1984). … Thach v. Scott, 410 S.W.2d 173 (Tenn. 1966). It is well settled in this jurisdiction that a preference for particular hours of work is not a good cause to refuse or leave work. Aladdin Industries, Inc. v.

Edens v. Central Benefits National Life Insurance

900 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 18, 1995

In Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. … In Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Langford v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

854 S.W.2d 100 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1993

Miller & Assoc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 150 Pa.Cmwlth. 634 , 616 A.2d 131 (1992) (for purpose of attorneys’ fee award, statutory language of “amount awarded” includes medical expenses); Wommer v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 84 Pa.Cmwlth. 275 , 479 A.2d 661 (1984) (in appropriate circumstances, it is proper to award attorneys’ fee based upon medical expenses); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v.

Odell Binkley v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 1, 2011

Worrall v. Kroger Co., 545 S.W.2d 736, 738 (Tenn. 1977). … Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp., 308 S.W.3d 843, 852 (Tenn. 2010).

Perry, Frederick v. v. ) THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP.

2024 TN WC 70 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 27, 2024

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2023); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Thyssenkrupp meets this burden, Mr. … Oldham v. Freeman Webb Company Realtors, 2024 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 8, *12 (March 6, 2024).

Exxon Corp. v. Metro Gov't

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 24, 2001

Austin v. Memphis Pub. Co., 655 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tenn. 1983). … Metro Beer Board cites several cases in which ‘location’ has referred to the building in which beer was sold. See generally, Bostic v. Board of Comm’rs, 1992 WL 62013, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. March 31, 1992); Lones v.

Akin v. MacKie

203 Tenn. 113 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1958

State v. Mitchell, 104 Tenn. 336 , 58 S.W. 365 ; State v. Allstadt, 166 Tenn. 349 , 61 S.W.2d 473 , 62 S.W.2d 566 ; and Boyd v. … See McCampbell v. Fountain Head Railroad Co., 111 Tenn. 55 , at page 68, 77 S.W. 1070 , 102 Am.St.Rep. 731 , citing Hawes v. City of Oakland, 104 U.S. 450 , 26 L.Ed. 827 ; City of Detroit v.

Allen, Heather v.

2025 TN WC 4 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 10, 2025

Gilbert v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 20, at *13 (June 7, 2019). So, Dr. Lanford’s opinion is presumed correct. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

State v. Green

995 S.W.2d 591 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1998

Emphasizing the factor concerning outside contacts or influence on the jury is the Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. Brown, 323 N.E.2d 902 (Mass. 1975). … See, e.g., Edwards, 552 P.2d at 1098 ; Brown, 323 N.E .2d at 904 -05; People v. McNeeley, 575 N.E.2d 926, 929 (Ill. App. Ct. 1991).

Lori Bates v. Joseph Bates

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 22, 2003

Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). … See Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220, 230-31 (Tenn. Ct. App.1998); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168; Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 775 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn. Ct. App.1989); and Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct.

Hall v. TN Bd. of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 1999

Ellison v. Alley, 902 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. App. 1995). … Therefore, Appellant had no right to appointment of counsel in Parole Board matters. Flowers v. Traughber, Tenn. App. No. 01A01-9609-CH-00392, filed March 27, 1997, perm. app. denied July 14, 1997.

Johnny J. Crass, Jr. v. State of Tn Bd. of Claims

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 18, 1999

See Coffman v. City of Pulaski, 220 Tenn. 642, 422 S.W. 2d. 429 (Tenn. 1967); Watson v. Tenn. Dept. of Correction, 970 S.W. 2d 494 (Tenn. App. 1998); Crowe v. John W. Harton Mem. Hosp., 579 S.W. 2d 888 (Tenn. … As explained by our Supreme Court in Shell v.

Evelyn Logue v. Shelbyville Housing Authority

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 1, 2001

Bringle v. Methodist Hosp., 701 S.W.2d 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985); Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 395 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981). … Nelson v. Martin, 958 S.W.2d 643 (Tenn. 1997).

Indian Hills Club Homeowner's Assn., Inc. v. Clayton L. and Cindy Cooper - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 29, 1995

Article V, Section One of the Declarations requires that plans for proposed construction or improvement be submitted in writing and approved by either the Board of Directors or by a Board-appointed architectural committee … App. 1925); Donoghue v. Prynnwood Corp., 255 N .E.2d 326 (M ass. 1970 ); W est Bloomfield Co. v. Haddock, 40 N.W .2d 738 (Mich. 1950); LeBlanc v. Webster, 483 S.W .2d 647 (Mo. App. 1972); Trieweiler v.

Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Evans

8 Tenn. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 1928

It is the insistence of the defendant that where usury appears upon the face of the note sued on, usury need not be pleaded' (citing Richardson v. Brown, 68 Tenn., 242 ; Bang v. Windmill Co., 96 Tenn., 365 ). … But this holding- has been expressly disapproved in Richardson v. Brown, 9 Baxter, 242 -249, as not in harmony with our laws defining usury.”

Epps v. Washington County

173 Tenn. 373 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1938

The power of the quarterly court to employ counsel is limited by statutes which have been construed and applied in the cases of Holtzclaw v. Hamilton County, 101 Tenn., 338 , 47 S. W., 421 ; McHenderson v. … W., 1016 ; State ex rel. v. True, 116 Tenn., 294, 313 , 95 S. W., 1028 . See State v. Turnpike Co., 151 Tenn., 150 , 268 S. W., 627 ; Code, sections 739 and 1059.

Valley v. Lambuth

1 Tenn. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 24, 1925

Tn Finlay v. Brown, supra, it is further stated: . … Brown, 122 Tenn., is distinguished from the case of Cole v. Taylor, 132 Tenn., In Cole v. Taylor, referring to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Finlay v. Brown, the court say: “The opinion of this court in Finlay v.

Lawson, Charles v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

2021 TN WC App. 89 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 27, 2021

Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004); Majors v. Randstad Inhouse Servs., L.P., No. M2010-01975-WC-R3-WC, 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 970, at *10 (Tenn. Worker’s Comp. Panel Oct. 19, 2011). … State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Tenn. 2009).

State of Tennessee v. James Theodore Menard, Alias

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 12, 2022

Brown, the victim started crying and told Ms. … Brown’s testimony.