Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.13s
402 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 20, 2008
Defendant asked Brown “to counsel” him but Brown declined because he was too angry with defendant and defendant “needed real psychological help which [Brown] was not qualified to give.” … Clearly, the conversations between defendant and Brown are not protected by the privilege. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cited 3 timesPublished69 N.J. 185 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1976
In this state, at least, it has been clearly established that courts do not belong in politics, that the independence of the judiciary depends upon that separation, and that political ties and debts and their accommodation … J. 482 (1970), the Court limited the doctrine of interspousal immunity in a woman’s negligence action against a defendant who became her husband.
Cited 30 timesPublished160 N.J. Super. 471 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1978
The trial judge found plaintiff sufficiently qualified to testify to the title examination he had made on the basis of plaintiff's explanation of his prior experience in the searching of titles. … This, however, was contrary to long-established decisional law on the subject.
Cited 17 timesPublished44 N.J.L. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1882
For so wide a rule they clearly furnish no support whatever. … Even in the event of Cur-ran’s refusal to serve, the law provided for the appointment of an incumbent, who would have served until Stuhr established his title.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 31, 2019
Defendants also argue that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and they are entitled to qualified immunity. (Reply Br.) A. … Remaining Claims The Court declines to reach Defendants’ arguments that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies and that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because Defendants
Cited 0 timesUnknown21 N.J. Misc. 193 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 15, 1943
The question thus raised must be settled by an application of the doctrine established by this court in Proprietors, &c., ads. … On the contrary, I think it is clearly mandatory. “The purpose of the act was plainly to establish uniform rules in respect to all appeals from the award of commissioners in all cases of condemnation.
Cited 2 timesPublished175 N.J. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 2003
Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 122, 140 , 393 A.2d 267 (1978) (declaring that “[t]o be given effect, any such waiver [of statutory rights] must be clearly and unmistakably established”); Paul v. … The “You and CIGNA” handbook qualifies as such a writing. The problem in this case is that the acknowledgment form signed by plaintiff contains no statement that he had agreed to the arbitration provision.
Cited 125 timesPublishedRONALD RAFANELLO VS. JORGE S. TAYLOR- ESQUIVEL (L-3488-15 AND L-1721-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 2020
Taylor Stroud, an AVS representative, advised NAB that A-4397-18T2 6 Taylor-Esquivel would not qualify as … Here, the express language of N.J.S.A. 13:5B-32 and N.J.A.C. 13:60 to 13:60-2.1 clearly establishes a separate statutory scheme for commercial motor vehicles having a registered weight of 10,001 pounds or more, like the
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Plainfield Borough v. Kentile Floors, Inc.
183 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 15, 1981
If a change in value occurs the town is free to establish that fact and avoid the operation of the statute. … Upon a motion made by the taxpayer, the statute directs the court to apply the freeze provided neither of the two exceptions contained therein is established.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCity of Plainfield v. Public Service Electric and Gas Company
82 N.J. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1980
Otherwise, one would be able to obtain immunity from state regulation by making private contractual arrangements.” See E & E Hauling, Inc. v. … The enforcement or nonenforcement of this statute clearly implicates the proposition that the law is now being inequitably administered.
Cited 61 timesPublishedState of New Jersey v. Anthony L. Gibson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 2025
The Sick Time And Outside Employment Policies Do Not Establish Duties Imposed "By Law." B. … Here, defendant was charged in count two under N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2(a), which concerns the commission of a qualifying unauthorized act.
Cited 0 timesPublished147 N.J. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1996
However, the State's evidence is not immunized from challenge simply because the prosecutor can rely on hearsay and non-record facts. … Clearly, a registrant also can raise challenges to the "variable" factors that go into determining the Scale score.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTHERESA TRIOLA VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 26, 2021
The burden to establish pension eligibility is on the applicant, not the Board. Patterson v. Bd. of Trs., State Police Ret. Sys., 194 N.J. 29, 50-51 (2008). … "[T]he creation of legislation is an essential function of the Legislature, so that sovereign immunity bars the equitable estoppel claim." Berg, 225 N.J. at 280.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished418 N.J. Super. 509 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2011
The compensation herein provided shall be paid to each member upon his qualifying into office as such member . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 52:10A-1 (emphasis added).] … To this end, the Assembly has established by rule a procedure for sanctioning members that requires the establishment by resolution of a six-member committee to serve charges and administer a hearing before reporting its
Cited 40 timesPublishedHoward Sav. Inst. v. TRUSTEES, AMHERST COLLEGE
61 N.J. Super. 119 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 14, 1960
establishes that neither defendant, now comprising Kinfolk, was a desirable beneficiary party. … Amherst was shown to be non-sectarian, and the resolution of Amherst clearly belies any other disposition.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 N.J. Eq. 256 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1868
If the gates were regularly raised in high water, it would not defeat the prescription ; it would only qualify it, and give the right, subject to their being raised in high water. … reached within three or four inches of the cap; but there is no proof at all that these gates were continued in use from 1846 to 1853, and such evidence of their width, if their use was proved, would not be sufficient to establish
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 21, 2020
First, the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination. … To establish a prima facie case of race discrimination under Title VII, a plaintiff must show that she: (1) was a member of a protected class; (2) was qualified for the position; (3) suffered an adverse employment action
Cited 0 timesUnknownTaylor v. AMCOR FLEXIBLES INC.
669 F. Supp. 2d 501 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 4, 2009
Prima Facie Case Plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. … Although the PIP did not mention those clients by name, it clearly set as two of Plaintiffs objectives closing new business and acquiring higher value added business.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIZZO v. SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 8, 2025
The third requirement is also clearly met, as state law does not appear to bar Plaintiffs claims from being raised in a state forum. See Gonzalez v. … To establish a RICO claim, Plaintiff must allege “(1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity, plus (5) an injury to business or property,” and (6) the racketeering activity must
Cited 0 timesUnknownLOCAL 195, IFPTE, AFL-CIO v. State
176 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 6, 1980
The board, in seeking the best qualified candidates for promotions, should not be restricted in its search to the faculty of *93 the North Bergen schools. … Clearly, this case presents the classic conflict described in Woodstown-Pilesgrove, etc., Bd. of Ed. v. Woodstown-Pilesgrove Regional Ed.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna