Case law

Schroeder v. Department of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2006

) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL) PROTECTION and BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ) et als, Respondents, The Petitioners in these consolidated appeals challenge a decision of the Board of Environmental … The decisions g v e considerable attention to hydrogeology and geology. Issues of noise, odor, impact and traffic have been the subject of the licensing applications and review.

Strang v. Hirst

61 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Peter v. Beverly, 10 Pet. 532 ; Ward v. Evans, Ld. Raym’d, 928 ; Mussen v. Price, 4 East. 197; Vail v. Foster, 4 Comst. 312; Ward v. Howe, 38 N. H. 35. … Brown v. Nourse, 55 Maine, 280.

Harrison v. Town of Cranberry Isles

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 10, 2009

Camp v. Town of Shapleigh, 2008 ME 53, ~ 9, 943 A.2d 595, 598 (quoting McGhie v. Town of Cutler, 2002 ME 62, ~ 5, 793 A.2d 504, 505). … Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, ~ 12, 943 A.2d 563, 566 (quoting Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, ~ 8, 746 A.2d 368, 372).

Drinkwater v. The Spartan

7 F. Cas. 1085 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1828

The 2 Browne, Civ. & Adm. Law, 96, is referred to as confirming this doctrine. That the courts of common law in England will grant a prohibition in such a case, is admitted. … It is so recognized in Christie v. Lewis, 2 Brod. & B. 410, and in Faith v. East India Co., 4 Barn. & Ald. 630.

Medical Mutual Insurance v. Bureau of Insurance

866 A.2d 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 2005

Starting in 2003, the Bureau of Insurance required Medical Mutual to include information on the salaries of its board of directors and senior management in a supplemental exhibit attached to its annual statement. … Town of Burlington v. Hosp. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 2001 ME 59, ¶ 13 , 769 A.2d 857, 861 .

State v. True

438 A.2d 460 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1981

Watkins Co. v. Brown, 134 Me. 473, 474 , 188 A. 212, 212 (1936); see also Goldthwaite v. Sheraton Restaurant, 154 Me. 214, 221 , 145 A.2d 362, 366 (1958) (treatises admitted by express consent). … Brown, supra.

Perkins v. Portland, Saco & Portsmouth Railroad

47 Me. 573 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

Nutting v. Conn. River R. R. Co., 1 Gray, 502 ; Van Santvoord v. St. John, 6 Hill, 157 ; Bank v. C. Trans. Co., 18 Verm., 140 ; 23 Verm., 209 ; Jennerson v. C. & A. R. R. Co., 27 Penn. State R. … Fairchild v. Slocum, 19 Wend., 329 ; F. & W. Railroad Co. v. Hanna, 6 Gray, 539 .

Richardson v. Robbins Lumber, Inc.

379 A.2d 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1977

(Robbins), was struck on his right side by a board while sorting lumber on a spruce chain at the Robbins yard. Experiencing severe back pain, Richardson reported the incident to the employer and on Mr. … MacLeod v. Great Northern Paper Co., Me., 268 A.2d 488, 489 (1970). See Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc., Me., 371 A.2d 633, 636 (1977); Oliver v.

Nardi v. Town of Kennebunkport

Superior Court of Maine · May 16, 2007

This Court deferentially reviews a board's factual findings to detennine whether the evidence before the board justified the decision. Lewis v. Maine Coast Artists, 2001 ME 75, «JI 14, 770 A.2d 644, 650. … The Court may not overturn a board's decision "because the record is inconsistent" or it is possible to reach a "different conclusion" than the board did. Twigg v.

Allstate Insurance v. Elwell

513 A.2d 269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 23, 1986

In Smith v. Allstate Ins. … (quoting Brown v. City of Laconia, 118 N.H. 376 , 386 A.2d 1276, 1277 (1978)).

Proprietors of Union Wharf v. Musset

48 Me. 307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

S. v. … S. v.

Stockly v. Doil

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2004

See Mastriano v. Blyer, 2001 ME 134, 9 11, 779 A.2d 951, 954; Stanton v. Univ. of Maine Sys., 2001 ME 96, 1 7, 773 A.2d 1045, 1049. … AND JULIET BROWNE, ESQ.

Laughlin v. Reed

89 Me. 226 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 22, 1896

Yeatman v. Sav. Inst. 95 U. S., 764 ; Newbert v. Fletcher, 84 Maine, 408; Hutchinson v. Murchie, 74 Maine, 187. … Weston v. Dorr, 25 Maine, 176; Grower v. Stevens, 19 Maine, 92; Wentworth v. Sawyer, 76 Maine, 434; Brown v. Howard, 86 Maine, 342.

Leighton v. Town of Falmouth

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2008

Twigg v. Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (1996). The Court must not substitute its judgment for that of a board on factual issues. Id. … /I Chapel Road Assoc., LLC v. Town of Wells, 2001 WIE 178, <.IT 10, 787 A.2d 137, 140 (citations omitted). "By skipping the step of making findings, the Board, in essence, invites a court to do the Board's job....

Lewiston v. Gagne

89 Me. 395 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1896

State v. Peck, 53 Maine, 284. … The record of the meeting of the board of mayor and aldermen, June 2, reads: “Bond of J. E. Gagne accepted and approved.” ... “Voted to adjourn to June 14, at 7.30 P. M.”

Kelley v. Kimball

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 9, 2015

In Vogt v. … However, in Jacques v.

Doyle v. Fernandez

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 6, 2018

See Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75, 5, 880 A.2d 1113. In this case Doyle attempted service by certified mail, but did not obtain acknowledgments of service. … Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75 ,r,r 8-13. A dismissal under Rule 12(b)(5) is without prejudice. Fries v. Carpenter, 567 A.2d 437, 439 (Me. 1989).

Yde v. State

376 A.2d 465 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1977

In State v. … Kobylanski v. Chicago Board of Education, 63 Ill.2d 165 , 347 N.E.2d 705, 709 (1976). For cases adopting this same rationale, see Eastern Scrap Services, Inc. v.

Peaker v. City of Biddeford

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2005

A remand to the Board is required before the Superior Court can review the Board's decision.  In Chapel Road Associates, L.L.C. v. … (quoting Maine AFL-CIO v. Stiperintendent of Ins., 595 A.2d 424, 428 (Me. 1991); see also Harrington v.

French v. Lord

69 Me. 537 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 1879

Brown v. Williams, 31 Maine, 406. If the husband is seized of a determinable fee, and it is determined by the happening of the event upon which it is limited, the right of dower on the part of the wife or widow ceases. … In Stinson v.