Case law

Christian v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 13, 2021

Rather, “a physical or mental impairment must be established by objective medical evidence from an acceptable medical source.” Id. … Thus, as the definition suggests, to qualify as a symptom, claimants must actually describe their perceived impairments.

Singh

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

Under § 1225(b)(2)(A), “in the case of an alien who is an applicant for admission, if the examining immigration officer determines that an alien seeking admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted … And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its

Allen v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2021

Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. See 42 U.S.C. § 423. … Lindsay clearly reflect that Plaintiff should be limited in her interactions with coworkers and supervisors and should have no interaction with the general public. The ALJ states he found the opinions of Dr.

Xiong

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 2026

established” Supreme Court precedent; (2) “involved an unreasonable application of clearly established” Supreme Court precedent; or (3) “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence … The Maples Court restated the general rule that “[n]egligence on the part of a prisoner’s postconviction attorney does not qualify as ‘cause’” to excuse a procedural default. Id.; see also id.

Murphy v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 19, 2020

The ALJ clearly considered Listings §§ 112.10 and 112.11 as he specifically noted: At the hearing, Mr. McTighe argued listing 112.10. … An impairment that manifests only some of the criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify. Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521, 531, 110 S.Ct. 885, 891, 107 L.Ed.2d 967 (1988).

HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.

398 P.3d 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2017

the United States , 55 the court stated where evidence is introduced concerning a doubt as to what party is to receive the benefit of an insurance policy, parol evidence is admissible; and although the insurance policy clearly … FOOTNOTES 1 16 O.S.2011 § 11A states in part: All contracts for deed for purchase and sale of real property made for the purpose or with the intention of receiving the payment of money and made for the purpose of establishing

Lyons & Clark, Inc. v. Alfano

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 9, 2025

“[T]he scope of who qualify as ‘privies’ varies according to the circumstances of the particular case.” Id. at 451. … Lyons & Clark claims it obtained a security interest in the Bentley because Speedsportz owed it a debt, clearly exempting it from the Code’s protections for buyers in the ordinary course

HARRIS v. STATE

450 P.3d 933 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 2019

Smith's report concludes that "the origin of a fire must be established before a cause can be opined." … Garner worked for several years in a psychiatric setting and was qualified to diagnose mental illness.

SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Stewart

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 3, 2022

Nevertheless, while not clearly defined, there is some limitation to the temporal proximity element of Section 727(a)(5). … In Straub the court concluded that the alleged loss of assets occurring ten years, seven years, and six years prior to bankruptcy was too remote in time qualify under § 727(a)(5).

Ellis v. Grimes

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 29, 2024

Defendant argues that “[t]he amount of video footage produced was clearly a direct result of Plaintiff’s litigation strategy” and thus the amount is unreasonable because “cases such as this one where fee-shifting statutes … For the expense of a transcript to qualify as a taxable cost, the transcript must be “reasonably necessary to the litigation of the case.” Mitchell, 218 F.3d at 1204; see also In re Williams, 558 F.3d at 1148.

Douglas v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 68 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1997

Fundom then qualified her answer stating, “I believe I could, if I felt very strongly.” … The State argued the evidence established Appellant’s identity.

Davis v. Core Civic, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Nov 9, 2020

Plaintiff further contends Defendant Cincotta was “the moving force behind Plaintiff[’s] not receiving adequate medical care by a qualified physician.” Id. at 33. … Plaintiff clearly has a constitutional right of meaningful access to the courts, and he must be provided a “reasonably adequate opportunity” to present his legal claims. Bounds v.

Johnson v. Kelly

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2024

According to claims data, F.M. had been OPC’s established patient since December 2014. Id. ¶ 129a.ii. … The allegations in the CII clearly state that Medicare, TRICARE, and FEHBP do not pay claims that are not medically necessary.

Rusty Williams McMurray

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 10, 2025

Claimants failed to establish the validity and amount of their debts. … While this is clearly irksome to Claimants, the Court cannot see how it can be blamed on or otherwise tied to Debtor.

Huddleston v. John Christner Trucking, LLC

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2020

It would clearly be impracticable to join hundreds, if not thousands, of plaintiffs from across the country in this action. Further, Huddleston has shown he will adequately protect the interests of the classes. … Where an individual takes steps toward independence “through incorporation, licensure, [and] advertisements,” that individual may qualify as an independent contractor. Id.

Thomas v. Oklahoma Land Holdings LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 27, 2020

Further, evidence presented at the temporary injunction hearing established that Caye Publishing had nothing more than a potential business interest in Parker County. … Whether information qualifies as a trade secret is a question of fact. See Central Plastics Co. v. Goodson, 537 P.2d 330, 333–35 (Okla. 1975).

Webster v. Fairway Management Inc

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 2, 2025

The Court does not have sufficient information regarding that oral request to determine that it should actually qualify as a request for accommodation – Plaintiff does not state to whom she made the request, how she made … The exemption is clearly intended to preempt OCPA lawsuits when a matter can properly be resolved by a state or federal agency – that is not the case here.

Kizer v. State

67 Okla. Crim. 16 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1939

I expressed an opinion as to whether or not I would be qualified as a juror after hearing that statement.” “By Mr, Welch: Just a minute, that’s what I objected to.” … It is a well-established rule that impeaching questions should not be propounded to a witness unless they are based upon facts that the interrogator intends to present in refutation of adverse answering of questions propounded

Mecom v. Morris

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 2022

I’ve heard the process takes a couple of years to qualify a ranch for this program, and I’d be willing to take that risk if I got comfortable with the mechanics of the program. … Stat. tit. 15, § 161 (“Technical words are to be interpreted as usually understood by persons in the profession or business to which they relate, unless clearly used in a different sense.”).

WRTGC-Commercial, LLC v. Precision Communications, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 27, 2021

Kyman responded that day, stating that she wanted “a qualified appraiser to perform an up to date appraisal on the property.” Id. … Plaintiff clearly demonstrates that the anticipated commission was greatly reduced by the omission.