Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

0.99s

  • State v. Reeves

    144 Or. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1996

    Brown testified that the room was very small and that, with Weather-ford’s hands in front of him, Brown had increased concern for officer safety. … State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 74 , 854 P2d 421 (1993). We are bound by the trial court’s findings of historical fact if they are supported by the record.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McGuire v. SAIF

    317 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2022

    That grant of authority extends to the rules of practice and pro- cedure that the board has articulated by order. See Booth v. … State v. Teixeira, 259 Or App 184, 190, 313 P3d 351 (2013).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Randall v. SAIF

    307 Or. App. 6 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2020

    in light of Gadalean v. … In its original opinion, Meyers v. SAIF, 291 Or App 331, 336-37, 420 P3d 28 (2018), vac’d sub nom Randal v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Olinger

    240 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

    State v. Hall, 339 Or. 7, 25 , 115 P.3d 908 (2005). … See Ball v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pack v. State

    116 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1925

    In State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149 ( 231 Pac. 926 ), the charging part of the indictment, upon which a conviction was upheld, reads thus: “That he, the said Clarence Brown, on the 15th day of November A. … Justice Brown did not sit in this case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Watt v. SAIF

    317 Or. App. 105 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2022

    Bank v. … Here, the board found that employer did not mandate claimant’s walk or direct her route. See Hearthstone Manor v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cascadia Wildlands v. Dept. of State Lands

    365 Or. 750 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2019

    As this court explained in Johnson v. … Cascadia Wildlands v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Allen

    16 Or. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 1974

    Defendant contends that this prosecution. for criminally negligent homicide is barred under the principles of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). … State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National Bank

    150 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1934

    Brown, 80 Kans. 520 ( 103 P. 102 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 824); McIver v. Williamson, 19 Okla, 454 ( 92 P. 170 , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 696); 55 C. J. 920, 921, § 905. … Co. v. Burnell, 127 Me. 503 ( 144 Atl. 649 ); Luce v. Brown, 96 Vt. 140 ( 118 Atl. 530 ). If the contract provides for payment, delivery alone is not sufficient to pass title: 55 C. J. 573, § 580.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Clowdus

    326 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 2023

    For pur- poses of that determination, the “quantum” of evidence is irrelevant, State v. Brown, 306 Or 599, 603 n 3, 761 P2d 1300 (1988), as is the existence of contrary evidence, State v. … Brown, 306 Or at 604.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Lovern

    234 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 2010

    State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … Defendant did not reference the relevant standards of assessing the validity of scientific evidence — State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), or State v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • De Los-Santos v. Si Pac Enterprises, Inc.

    278 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 2016

    Citing Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Roy, 112 Or App 10 , 827 P2d 915 (1992), and K-mart v. … See generally ORS 656.268; see also SAIF v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Bailey

    258 Or. App. 18 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2013

    The Oregon Supreme Court has not addressed the matter since Dempster , which was decided eight years before Brown . In State v. … United States v. Ceccolini, 435 US 268, 276 , 98 S Ct 1054, 1060 , 55 L Ed 2d 268 (1978) (citing Brown, 422 US at 603 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Schermerhorn

    210 Or. 23 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1957

    Brown v. Miles, 193 Or 466 , 238 P2d 761 , is not controlling. … In the case of State Land Board v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. Deschutes County

    308 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 13, 2021

    Nehmzow v. Deschutes County, 308 Or App 533, 479 P3d 340 (2021). 498 Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. … Jones v. Willamette United Football Club, 307 Or App 502, 514, 479 P3d 326 (2020). 502 Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bruntz-Ferguson v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

    310 Or. App. 618 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 2021

    Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore, 318 Or 363, 366, 867 P2d 1373 (1994). … The board affirmed the ALJ’s order.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • SAIF Corp. v. Williams

    281 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2016

    .]”); SAIF v. … ’s award”); Driver v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Matter of Marriage of Fromdahl

    314 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1992

    State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 407 ; State v. Lyon, supra, 304 Or at 224 . … We need not decide in this case whether the concerns identified by this court in State v. Brown, supra, and State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • SAIF v. Chavez-Cordova

    314 Or. App. 5 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 2021

    See Halfman v. … The board found: 8 SAIF v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baker v. City of Woodburn

    190 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 2003

    Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 498 , 985 P2d 854 , modified on recons, 162 Or App 527 , 986 P2d 666 (1999); Landsing Prop. v. … Thomas Creek Lumber and Log Co. v. Board of Forestry, 188 Or App 10, 18 , 69 P3d 1238 (2003).

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.