Case law

Chrysler Corporation v. Walter E. Allen, Inc.

375 P.2d 878 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1962

A “Third Amended Answer and Cross Petition” they filed in January, 1959, contained a qualified general denial, together with a special denial that the account plaintiff was suing on was due at the time this action was filed … But we cannot say there was so clearly a lack of denial — as to the amount of such balance — that the trial court manifestly erred, or abused his discretion, in granting such a new trial as would afford an opportunity for

Hayes v. Owen

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023

immunity. … immunity at this stage of the litigation.

NOLEN v. STATE

485 P.3d 829 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2021

. ¶29 That IQ tests are imprecise measurements of intellectual disability is well established. … Nelson, Atkins' IQ score "would automatically qualify for Social Security disability income." Dr.

HARTER ENERGY v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION

486 P.3d 732 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 2021

The Taxpayer must first obtain an order from the Oklahoma Corporation Commission stating that the project is a qualifying enhanced recovery project. Id. §1001(D)(9). … The availability of alternative procedures outside the uniform code must be clearly stated by the legislature. Id.

Willow Wind, Inc. v. City of Midwest City

790 P.2d 1067 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1989

. § 27 Any incorporated city or town in this State may, by a majority of the qualified property tax paying voters of such city or town, voting at an election to be held for that purpose, be allowed to become indebted in a … They clearly reveal that *1072 the city’s only obligation is reimbursement of ninety percent of any amount collected from subsequent developers, if any.

Aceco Valves, LLC v. Neal

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2024

qualifying as a trade secret under the OUTSA. … This rationale is squarely in line with the Techtrol court’s holding that OUTSA “does not clearly express that it abrogates or displaces the common law tort of misappropriation of business information not qualifying as

Revilla v. State

65 O.B.A.J. 1491 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 1994

Further, the instructions clearly informed the jury that Appellant was charged with the crime of child abuse murder. … Steumky was qualified to give an expert opinion as to the cause of the decedent’s injuries. The jury was well aware that Dr.

Barbre v. Hood

214 F. 473 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1914

that the only conveyance he was empowered to make while under the age of 21 years was such as might be made upon order of the proper county court of Oklahoma (exercising probate jurisdiction), pursuant to the state laws establishing … That said section is not to be construed and enforced independent of other sections of the act is clearly manifest by reading sections 3, 4, and 5.

NVI, LLC v. Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality

276 P.3d 1069 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2012

The 24-hour reporting requirements of 10 C.ER. § 20.2202(b) clearly fall on the licensee, not the individual employee. … Fraley would qualify as a legal expert in the administrative law of other states on this matter, we have no access to any source document he relied upon to determine the validity of his conclusions.

Marathon Battery Company v. Kilpatrick

418 P.2d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1965

The Court further stated: “ * * * Those restrictions are more than a guarantee of immunity from inconvenient or distant litigation. … Defendants’ case was built around the testimony of four qualified experts having special knowledge, both of the component materials and parts and the construction of such batteries.

Oklahoma State Bank of Sayre v. Seaton

69 Okla. 99 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1918

Since the word “surety” can only affect the status of the makers of the note as between themselves, and as Lyonfs liability to the plaintiffs is the same as if he had signed the instrument without using the qualifying word … that, being primarily liable, an accommodation maker was not discharged by an extension of time to the principal debtor, and that, independently of all decisions based on the law merchant, the Negotiable Instruments Act clearly

Canady v. Reynolds

65 O.B.A.J. 2820 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1994

The fact an inmate is eligible for the number of earned credits provided by law at the time his crime was committed has already been established by this Court. 2 See Ekstrand; Weaver v. … I continue to believe this Court erred in its determination the Oklahoma "earned credit” system of providing inmates with the opportunity to earn additional time reductions from their sentences if they qualify for the program

Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.

67 O.B.A.J. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1996

Further, we have held that Section 6's protection does not require that the government waive all immunity in order to allow suits to proceed to court. Griggs v. State ex rel. … The prudential bar of restraint demands that when, as here, legal relief clearly is affordable upon alternate grounds — which rest upon a firmly established principle of federal law — consideration of an unsettled state constitutional

Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States

199 F.R.D. 357 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 2001

Plaintiffs must establish that at least a single issue is common to the class. J.B. ex rel. Hart v. Valdez, 186 F.3d 1280, 1288 (10th Cir.1999). … Plaintiffs argue this test is clearly met in the case at bar.

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTER

2020 OK 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 2020

Section 18-118 clearly requires the State Auditor and Inspector shall "approve" the auditor. … In order to do so it was necessary to establish a terminal date upon the effectiveness of prior appropriations.

Lott v. State

75 O.B.A.J. 2385 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 2004

Penetration was clearly proven. … We find no abuse of the trial court's discretion in qualifying McKenna as an expert.

Goins v. Black

66 Okla. 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

It is well established in this jurisdiction that the preceding sections of the statutes provide to the owner of real estate two methods of procedure to recover damages inflicted by trespassing animals. … the peace districts there is no justice of the peace qualified and acting.

Davis v. Fieker

952 P.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1998

The abortions follow the statutory scheme established in title 63. … immunity from liability. 53 The opinion concluded that the Department could follow the opinion but was not compelled to do so. 54 VII.

Avington v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 1, 2025

The Act broadly defines the phrase “discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability” to include “excluding or otherwise denying equal jobs or benefits to a qualified individual because of the known … Even liberally construed, the text of Avington’s EEOC charge does not clearly set forth the basis of a disability-related association discrimination claim.

In Re Lm

276 P.3d 1088 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2012

Clearly, only the judge who issued the 2010 Protective Order had authority to decide its validity. … Thus, at least to the 2010 Protective Order, the record does not establish any surprise of its existence.