Case law

Argyrou v. State

349 Md. 587 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 18, 1998

Rather, it clearly seems to be that the court distrusted the circumstances surrounding the confession; it found the timing of it untrustworthy and suspicious. … In any event, the court believed quite clearly that the petitioner and Benner were both involved in the two incidents.

Dorsey v. Nold

130 Md. App. 237 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 10, 2000

Clearly, the Dorseys intended to elicit extensive testimony from Dr. … The Dorseys were obviously required to establish the cause of Candace’s death in their case-in-chief.

Lynch v. Lynch

342 Md. 509 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 10, 1996

Proof of inability to comply, however, does not guarantee immunity from imprisonment. … That fact is well established by Maryland law, see, e.g., Soldano v.

Mealey v. Mayor of Hagerstown

92 Md. 741 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 21, 1901

to be established. … This Act provided for its submission to the qualified voters of Hagerstown before it was to take effect.

Evans v. State

28 Md. App. 640 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 25, 1975

In going on to the subject of self-defense, the trial judge seemed clearly to put the burden of establishing its necessary elements upon the defendant: “The Defendant in this case contends, however, that he is not guilty … In these qualified forms, *664 the error has been limited to the now unconstitutional presumption of non-mitigation.

Kulbicki v. State

207 Md. App. 412 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 26, 2012

Q: Have you had an occasion in the past to qualify as an expert in firearms identification? … A: Yes, I have qualified in the [s]tate of Maryland, states of Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the Federal courts here in the United States.

Armco Steel Corp. v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation

236 Md. 168 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 28, 1964

The record clearly established and the trial judge found that the profits normally realized by Asarco for each ton of ore refined for others was approximately $1.50. … The history of Section 5 clearly supports the above conclusion. When Section 5 was adopted in the 1949 revision of the City’s Charter, it replaced former Section 4 thereof.

Kramer v. Levitt

79 Md. App. 575 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 8, 1989

so much of it as is true and deny or qualify the remainder. … Thus, that older view is now regarded as “clearly untenable” and the privilege recognized under Rule 36. (Footnotes omitted.) 8 C. Wright & A.

Nicholson Air v. Board of County Commissioners of Allegany County

120 Md. App. 47 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 27, 1998

Maryland Rule 2-501 establishes a two-part test for summary judgment. … They were necessary to re-establish to meet the regulations for carrying passengers.

Mattison v. Maryland Transit Administration Maryland Department of Transportation

District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 1, 2021

Mattison also alleges that he qualified for 480 hours of “Family Medical Leave” time and 688 hours of “Health & Welfare” time as of September 1, 2020. (/d. 64.) … To establish a claim for disparate treatment, a plaintiff must prove: “(1) that he has a disability; (2) that he is otherwise qualified for the employment or benefit in question; and (3) that he was excluded from the employment

Hausner

District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 1, 2025

Marine Personnel & Provisioning, Inc., 955 F.2d 382, 385, 385– 86 (5th Cir. 1992) (explaining Public Vessels Act does not clearly define “public vessel” and discussing meaning of public vessel (quoting Santos v. … Hausner’s claims in this case rest at the intersection of three statutes that waive the United States’ sovereign immunity to “establish the scope of this Court’s power to hear . . . claims involving operations

Herd v. State

125 Md. App. 77 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 24, 1999

When the appellant and his three companions broke down the door with an axe, that clearly qualified as a breaking. When they subsequently entered 924 Abbott Court, that unquestionably constituted an entering. … He took the stand in his own defense, however, and clearly established a prima facie case that he reasonably believed that he was entitled to enter the premises: The defense contended that appellant reasonably believed he

Blankumsee v. The State Of Maryland

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 27, 2020

“To establish a violation of either statute, plaintiffs must prove ‘(1) they have a disability; (2) they are otherwise qualified to receive the benefits of a public service, program, or activity; and (3) they were denied … hospitalization and “qualified medical staff 24 hours a day.” ECF No. 1 at 3.

Akpa v. Frederick Health Hospital

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 2, 2025

Pleading Adequacy Even absent operation of Eleventh Amendment immunity, Plaintiff’s due process claim would fail because he fails to allege sufficient facts to establish a plausible … established in order to be meaningful.”

Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. Goldstein

388 Md. 299 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 9, 2005

September 23, 1999 is ESTABLISHED to be the Absolute Final Bar date in this liquidation proceeding. 4. … It is a four-part definition that places limitations on what qualifies as a “covered claim” pursuant to the statute.

Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.

366 Md. 29 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 16, 2001

There clearly was more than a minimal risk involved. … The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.

Samson v. State

27 Md. App. 326 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 30, 1975

His ignorance of the law does not give him immunity from punishment for crime. Hopkins v. State, 193 Md. 489, 498-499 . … The evidence of conspiracy with Oliver Fisher was clearly established as Fisher arranged the sale from appellant to the trooper. Wilson, Valentine and Nutter v. State, 8 Md. App. 653, 671 .

108oag3

Maryland Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 2023

If the text is “unambiguous and clearly consistent with the statute’s apparent purpose,” we generally end our inquiry into legislative intent and apply the statute as written. Id. … In fact, the General Assembly was presented with a suggested amendment that would have clearly implicated—and restricted— food preparation but failed to take any action on that measure.

Starke v. Starke

134 Md. App. 663 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 3, 2000

The invariable inquiry is whether there was some competent evidence to establish all of the elements needing to be established to justify submitting the *680 case to the jury or to sustain a judge’s verdict as not-clearly … Sterling, 269 Md. 356, 361 , 305 A.2d 829 (1973): *682 It is also clearly established that undue influence may arise from the breach of a confidential relationship existing between a grantor and his grantee.

Jackson v. Carin

District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 19, 2022

He addresses qualified immunity only in the portion of his brief that opposes Detective Carin’s Motion. See Pl. MSJ. … Even if he fails to establish that he had probable cause, Detective Carin argues that he is entitled to summary judgment under the doctrine of qualified immunity.