Case law

Darragh v. Bird

3 Or. 229 · Wasco County Circuit Court, Oregon · Jul 15, 1870

Brown is one of those cases where a person slept in one 'precinct and boarded in another; but, in giving his testimony as to his residence, lie says “I think where Thomas Smith lives is my residence.” … Webster v. Brynes ( 34 Cal. 273 ) is a case in point.

Berman v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 2024

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). … Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2011).

Cook v. Employment Division

63 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

In Cook v. … Brown v. Adult and Family Services, 51 Or App 213, 215-16 , 625 P2d 160 (1981), aff’d 293 Or 6 , 643 P2d 1266 (1982); see also Goldhammer v. AFSD, 63 Or App 587 , 666 P2d 268 (1983). We turn now to the merits.

Walker v. School District No. 1

159 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1938

As an expression of my good faith in handing in this resignation, I agree that my present residence shall be open for inspection by the School Board of School District No. … On June 5, 1936, plaintiff’s resignation was presented to the board of directors and accepted by said board. .

Haviland Hotels Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

20 Or. App. 105 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 1975

However, they were not what you would call hash browns as they were not browned. … Eor this reason we hold that the OLCC’s order is unlawful in substance and must therefore be reversed. *109 See generally, Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601, 605 , 378 P2d 558 (1963), and Phillips v.

Rickert v. State Industrial Accident Commission

122 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1927

BROWN, J. … We refer to the case of West v.

Port of Nehalem v. Nicholson

122 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1927

In one case a woman invoked it to avoid a contract by-reason of duress practiced upon her intended husband: Rau v. Von Zedlits, 132 Mass. 164 . … J., and Brown and Coshow, JJ., concur.

Whitney v. Canadian Bank of Commerce

232 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1962

Later, when the State Land Board heard of the estate and became apprised that Molin had no heirs, the circuit court permitted the state to become an intervener so that it could claim an escheat. … Grignon v. Shope, 100 Or 611 , 197 P 317 , in referring to gifts causa mortis, stated: “* * * They are liable to occasion fraud and are subject to many mistakes.

State v. Porter

102 Or. App. 22 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 1990

Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986), the so-called automobile exception to the warrant requirement. … In State v.

Coast Land Co. v. Oregon Colonization Co.

44 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1904

Brown for the purchase of about 55,000 acres of land in Benton, Polk, and Lincoln counties at the rate of $1.75 an acre. … If he has knowingly acquiesced in the judgment, or been guilty of unreasonable delay in seeking his remedy, relief will be denied him: 1 Black, Judgments, § 313; McQuillan v. Hunter, 1 Phila. 50 ; McCormick v.

United States v. Ellis

122 F. 1016 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 12, 1903

Ellis, and other like cases, I expressed the opinion that the rule adopted by Judge Deady in United States v. Ball (C. C.) 31 Fed. 667 , did not apply upon the case so stated. The rule laid down in United States v. … Brown and one Fred Tietgen. Brown and Tietgen were homesteaders at the time.

Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

294 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2018

PER CURIAM *507 Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-032-0005(2), a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, asserting that the rule is invalid because it violates two constitutional provisions

State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.

289 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

In support of this contention defendant relies on Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Defendant’s reliance on Brown is misplaced.

Dundas v. Lincoln County

48 Or. App. 1025 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 1980

In Smith v. … of the Fair Board.

Mohler Et Ux. v. Fish Commission

129 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1929

As stated by Justice Wolverton in Salem Mills Co. v. … Bean, Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

292 Or. App. 556 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

PER CURIAM *557 Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-035-0022, a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), asserting that the rule is inconsistent with the board's statutory

Putnam v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2018

State v. Trax

179 Or. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2002

That building was a boarding house in which the defendant resided. 246 P at 1106. … In State v.

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Revenue

12 Or. Tax 391 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 19, 1993

In 1984, Simplot appealed its assessed value to the board of equalization. The board ordered the value reduced to $36,056,150. The assessor appealed that order to defendant. … Brown admitted that all units of comparison were weak.

Olsen v. State Ex Rel. Johnson

276 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1976

Now, the Intermediate Education District (IED) Board is the district boundary board. ORS 330.080. … The California court relied upon Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 , 74 S Ct 686 , 98 L Ed 873 , 38 ALR2d 1180 (1953), as the classic expression of the principle that education is a fundamental interest.