Opinion

Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

294 Or. App. 506
427 P.3d 1145

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed: Oct 17, 2018
Status: Published
On the bench: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM

*507 Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-032-0005(2), a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, asserting that the rule is invalid because it violates two constitutional provisions. See ORS 183.400(4) (court shall declare a rule invalid only if the rule violates constitutional provision, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency that adopted the rule, or was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures). Having reviewed the parties' arguments, we reject petitioner's contentions and conclude that the challenged rule is valid.

OAR 255-032-0005(2) held valid.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.