Opinion

Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

292 Or. App. 556
420 P.3d 698

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed: Jun 27, 2018
Status: Published
On the bench: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM

*557 Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-035-0022, a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), asserting that the rule is inconsistent with the board's statutory authority. See ORS 183.400(4) (court shall declare a rule invalid only if the rule violates constitutional provision, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency that adopted the rule, or was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures). Having reviewed the parties' arguments, we reject petitioner's contentions and conclude that the challenged rule is valid.

OAR 255-035-0022 held valid.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.