Case law

Gasper v. Board of Trustees of Halifax Community College

366 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 2012

Clark v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control

14 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

than five per centum (5%) and not more than fourteen per centum (14%) of absolute alcohol, the per centum of alcohol to be reckoned by volume, which wine has been approved as to identity, quality and purity by the State Board … of Health, and it shall be legal to sell said wines in drugstores and grocery stores for off premises consumption; such sales however shall be subject to the rules and regulations of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

Board of Commissioners v. C. W. McNear & Co.

186 N.C. 352 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1923

Board of Commissioners of Randolph County v. Trogdon

75 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

Emporia Concrete & Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners

160 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1912

Plaintiff’s counsel relied on Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., 561 ; McDonald v. McArthur, 154 N. C., 122 ; Sweet v. Morrison, 116 N. J., 19; Condon v. … A contract similar, in substantial respects, to the one upon which this suit is based, was considered and construed in O’Brien v. Mayor of New York, 139 N.

Brown v. Take 5 LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2026

-3-  BROWN V. … -7-  BROWN V.

Concerned Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of Adjustment

94 N.C. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1989

Heery v. Town of Highlands Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612 , 300 S.E. 2d 869 (1983). … Id. at 613 , 300 S.E. 2d at 870 , citing Pigford v. Board of Adjustment, 49 N.C. App. 181 , 270 S.E. 2d 535 (1980), disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 722 , 274 S.E. 2d 230 (1981); Jackson v.

Union Bank of Richmond v. Board of Com'rs

90 F. 7 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · Nov 11, 1898

Graham v. Tate, 77 N. C. 120 ; Tate v. Phillips, Id. 126 ; Bank v. Board of Com’rs of Town of Oxford, 116 N. C. 340 , 21 S. E. 410 . … Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall. 535 ; Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314 ; Edwards v. Kearzey, 96 U. S. 595 ; Barnitz v. Beverly, 163 U. S. 118 , 16 Sup. Ct. 1042.

Premier Plastic Surgery Center, PLLC v. Board of Adjustment

213 N.C. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

“Findings of fact are an important safeguard against arbitrary and capricious action by the Board of Adjustment because they establish a sufficient record upon which this Court can review the Board’s decision.” Crist v. … See Mecklenburg Cnty. v. Westbery, 32 N.C.

Bashford v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General Contractors

107 N.C. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1992

Savings and Loan League v. … In Cole v. Duke Power Co., 81 N.C.

Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of Education

198 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1929

Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508 , 125 S. E., 12 ; Holler v. Tel. Co., 149 N. C., 336 , 63 S. E., 92 ; Strauss v. Wilmington, 129 N. C., 99 , 39 S. E., 772 ; Tucker v. Satterthwaite, 120 N. C., 118 , 27 S. E., 45 . … McAdoo v. R. R., 105 N. C., 140 , 11 S. E., 316 ; Emery v. R. R., 102 N. C., 209 , 9 S. E., 139 . New trial.

Cannon v. North Carolina State Board of Education

917 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1996

Cannon v. N.C. State Board of Education, 342 N.C. 399 , 464 S.E.2d 43 (1995). … Doe v. Shenandoah County School Board, 737 F.Supp. 913, 915 (W.D.Va.1990), citing Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Mfg. Co., 550 F.2d 189, 193 (4th Cir.1977); see also Commonwealth of Virginia v.

Gates School District Committee v. Board of Education

236 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1952

Smathers, 213 N.C. 183 , 195 S.E. 376 ; Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N.C. 499 , 193 S.E. 732 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 645 , 155 S.E. 550 ; Clark v. … Board of Education, supra; Pemberton v. Board of Education, supra; Newton v. School Committee, 158 N.C. 186 , 73 S.E. 886 ; Pickler v. Board of Education, supra; Venable v. School Committee, supra.

Mazzucco v. NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

291 N.C. 323 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1976

230 S.E.2d 676 (1976) 291 N.C. 323 Mary Frances MAZZUCCO and Geraldine Patton McClelland v. The NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 7, 1976. William H.

Donnelly v. Board of Adjustment of Village of Pinehurst

99 N.C. App. 702 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 1990

Concrete Co. v. … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. at 112 , 37 S.E.2d at 132 , 168 A.L.R. at 6 .

Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.

464 F. Supp. 1027 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 27, 1978

In Branch v. … Alexander County Board of Education, 285 N.C. 188 , 203 S.E.2d 820 (1974); Turner v. Gastonia City Board of Education, 250 N.C. 456 , 109 S.E.2d 211 (1959).

Pierce v. . Alspaugh

83 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

Morehead v. Winston, 73 N. C., 398 ; Parker v. Shuford, 76 N. C. 219 . 2. The charge given is unexceptionable and the law properly declared by the court. … Bynum v. Bynum, 11 Ired., 632 ; Avery v. Stephenson, 12 Ired., 34 ; Jones v. Bunker, at this term. The judgment must therefore be affirmed and it is so ordered. No error. Affirmed.

North Carolina Department of Correction v. North Carolina Medical Board

363 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 2009

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial court. *192 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Brown v. … In Brown v.

Days Inn of America, Inc. v. Board of Transportation

24 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1975

[have been] made available to the State for the purpose” of controlling outdoor advertising “and the Board of Transportation has entered into an agreement with the Secretary of Transportation” with respect to the control … See McClure v. Township of Oxford, 94 U.S. 429 (1877). It is very doubtful whether petitioner could have determined the existence of Morawski’s letter at or prior to the time it purchased the billboards from Ever-Glo.

Gates v. . Pollock

50 N.C. 344 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1858

The instrument offered by the defendant cannot be taken in any other sense, than as a release by the plaintiff, Brown, of all his interest in the contract for the work and labor done by him and his partner on the house of … See Stinson v. Moody, 3 Jones’ Rep. 53, and the authorities therein referred to. The defence would be clearly admissible under the plea of the gen *346 eral issue, non assumpsit.