Opinion

Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of Education

  • 198 N.C. 111
  • 150 S.E. 713
  • 1929 N.C. LEXIS 426
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Dec 18, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Stacy
On the bench
Stacy
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.5%

The opinion

*112

Stacy, C.

J.

Plaintiff alleges that the buildings in question bave been completed and accepted by the defendant. This is denied. It is provided by C. S., 5415, among other things, that all new school buildings “shall be inspected, received and approved by the county superintendent of public instruction before full payment is made therefor.” The issues submitted to the jury, therefore, are insufficient to support the judgment, as they are not determinative of the controversy. The crucial fact of liability is yet undecided. For this reason, a new trial must be awarded.

Bank v. Broom Co.,

188 N. C., 508 , 125 S. E., 12 ;

Holler v. Tel. Co.,

149 N. C., 336 , 63 S. E., 92 ;

Strauss v. Wilmington,

129 N. C., 99 , 39 S. E., 772 ;

Tucker v. Satterthwaite,

120 N. C., 118 , 27 S. E., 45 .

A verdict, whether upon one or many issues, should establish facts sufficient to enable the court to proceed to judgment.

McAdoo v. R. R.,

105 N. C., 140 , 11 S. E., 316 ;

Emery v. R. R.,

102 N. C., 209 , 9 S. E., 139 .

New trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.