Case law

Pitts v. United States

228 F. Supp. 3d 412 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2017

Jones, 225 F.3d 468, 470 (4th Cir. 2000) (“Rule 41(e) does not contain a waiver of sovereign immunity.”); Pena v. … established Fourth Amendment rights”); Crawford v.

Texas Department of Public Safety and Steven McCraw in His Official Capacity as Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety v. Maria Luisa Mejia Sunuc, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Marcos Antonio Castro Estrada, and as Next Friend to L.M. and H.M., Minors

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Feb 3, 2022

Alternatively, DPS argued that it could conclusively establish that its troopers were entitled to official immunity, thereby cloaking DPS in derivative immunity. See DeWitt v. … Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378–81 (2007) (holding that video evidence can conclusively establish that an officer is entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force claim). 5 DPS’s primary argument on appeal is that

Baron v. Lissade

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 27, 2021

“Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. Pauly, 137 S. … Because there is no clearly established law on this circuit that fabrication of evidence during an administrative bench trial ever violates the Constitution, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

Simms v. Rivers

District Court, S.D. Texas · Feb 12, 2024

Clark, 1 F. 4th 411, 421 (5th Cir. 2021) (denying qualified immunity on the basis that prior precedent “clearly established that pretrial detainees have a Fourteenth Amendment right to medical care”). … Because this right was clearly established, they are not entitled to qualified immunity.

Sammye R. Holloway v. Sally Brush Clermont County, Ohio

220 F.3d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 2000

“[T]he actions of-a prosecutor are not absolutely immune merely because they are performed by a prosecutor. Qualified immunity represents the norm.... … Even if such motivations could legitimate Brush’s actions, it would be through qualified immunity, not absolute immunity, and she has not claimed qualified immunity.

Horn v. Adger

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 2025

5 Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009) (explaining that qualified immunity protects government of- 6 ficials from liability “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or con- 7 stitutional … City of New York, 4 374 F.3d 93, 117 (2d Cir. 2004) (explaining that “a qualified immunity argument made” at a trial 5 on excessive force and battery claims “could not preserve a defense of qualified immunity to the

Troy K. Scheffler v. Jack Molin

743 F.3d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 25, 2014

Molin argued that Scheffler’s constitutional rights had not been violated and that, regardless, the defense of qualified immunity applied. … When the defense of qualified immunity has been asserted, we evaluate both whether the defendant violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights and whether those rights were clearly established. Chambers v.

Jackson v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.

64 O.B.A.J. 3587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1993

The Hospital was clearly within the Act’s protection when its personnel escorted the visitor out of the surgery area, seated him on the bed in the hallway, and then redirected their attention to the wife. … The Hospital was clearly responding to an apparent emergency that called for immediate action. THE COURT OF APPEALS’ OPINION IS VACATED AND THE TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT REINSTATED AND AFFIRMED.

Manna v. Cribari

District Court, D. Colorado · Jan 27, 2020

Early last year, the Supreme Court issued an opinion addressing the “clearly established” prong of a qualified immunity defense for a Fourth Amendment claim, in which the Court re- emphasized that “the clearly established … district court to rebut qualified immunity” and “[b]ecause Plaintiffs did not proffer clearly established authority that Ms.

Aurea E. Vazquez Rios v. Rafael Hernandez Colon, Etc.

819 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 20, 1987

Certainly, the law was not in any sense “clearly established” to the contrary. … , have granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment on the basis of their qualified immunity.

Watson v. Cook

District Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 4, 2025

Once an officer pleads qualified immunity, the plaintiffhas the burden to establish that the officer violated the plaintiff s clearly established federal rights. Jd. at 1088. “This is a demanding standard.” … City of Palestine, 333 F.3d 621, 623 (Sth Cir. 2003) (“Qualified immunity protects officers from suit unless their conduct violates a clearly established constitutional right.”’).

McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services

District Court, D. Kansas · Feb 16, 2024

This right likely does not exist, and certainly is not clearly estab- lished, so qualified immunity requires dismissal. See Pearson v. … Coats and Zmuda are therefore enti- tled to qualified immunity. See, e.g., Stewart v.

Camreta v. Greene

563 U.S. 692 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 2011

But the Court of Appeals further held that qualified immunity shielded the officials from monetary liability because the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established under existing law. … Many Courts of Appeals therefore decline to consider district court precedent when determining if constitutional rights are clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity. See, e.g., Kalka v.

DOWNS v. BOROUGH OF JENKINTOWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2020

“The test for qualified immunity is objective.” Beers-Capitol v. Whetzel, 256 F.3d 120, 142 n.15 (3d Cir. 2001). … Litig., 49 F.3d 945, 961 (3d Cir. 1995) (“[I]f the law was established clearly, the official still may obtain qualified immunity if he claims ‘extraordinary circumstances and can prove that he neither knew nor should have

Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

813 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 1993

Lott counters the Bivens , claim by arguing that he is entitled to a qualified immunity defense. … On a summary judgment motion based on qualified immunity grounds, the Court is to determine the law applicable to the claim, whether it was clearly established at the time of the action, and if Defendant should have known

Hopps v. City of Tampa

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 24, 2025

“In assessing qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage, ‘the qualified immunity inquiry and the Rule 12(b)(6) standard become intertwined.’” Aguirre-Jarquin v. … See Wilson, 54 F. 4th at 660 (“[I]t is not necessary to decide both prongs [of the qualified immunity analysis] where it is plain that the right is not clearly established.”).

Anne Marie Gennusa v. Brian Canova

748 F.3d 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 8, 2014

Canova were not protected by qualified immunity. Det. Marmo and Sgt. … The district court also denied qualified immunity to Det. Marmo and Sgt. Canova.

Oldson v. Burnett

District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Feb 14, 2024

Lucas Cnty., 799 F.3d 530, 539–42 (6th Cir. 2015) (determining that a supervisor did not enjoy qualified immunity after finding that the right violated by the excessively forceful subordinates was clearly established). … violated clearly established law.’”

Magnolia Island Plantation v. Whittington

29 F.4th 246 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 21, 2022

That party—in this case, Lollar— must then show that (1) the “official’s conduct violated a constitutional right” of the opponent of immunity, and (2) “the right was clearly established at the time of the violation … Here, we need not examine the “clearly established” prong, because Lollar has failed to meet her burden of showing a constitutional violation. 5 Case: 20-30805 Document

Kounelis v. Sherrer

529 F. Supp. 2d 503 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 3, 2008

Thus, having found that the alleged facts established the violation of a constitutional right and that the constitutional right was clearly established, the Court denied qualified immunity to Sergeants James and Perez. … established at the time of the alleged violation, the Court has limited its qualified immunity analysis to Kounelis's excessive force claim. 12 .