Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1921

10,000+ results

8.65s

  • Brown v. Brown

    32 S.D. 216 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899

    defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    20 S.C. Eq. 363 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1847

    Brown,” and in his answer to the complainant’s former bill, he not only admits the trust, but indignantly repels the insinuation that he had, at any time, disavowed his fiduciary relation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2 R.I. 381 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Sep 6, 1852

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    6 Pa. D. & C. 698 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Jan 5, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    42 A.D.2d 698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1973

    wherein the nature and object of Action No. 1 is to set aside a separation agreement, of Action No. 2 is to recover damages under such separation agreement, and of Action No. 3 is a Family Court support proceeding; Marlon Brown … Under the circumstances, judgment in favor of respondent Barbara Brown is premature. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    485 So. 2d 287 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    20 A.D.2d 860 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1964

    ('See Nomako v. Ashton, 20 A D 2d 331.) .Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to ■proceed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    23 A.D.2d 829 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1965

    (See TonJconogy v. J a fin, 21 A D 2d 264; People v. Hail Fellows, 23 A D 2d 734.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    247 A.D. 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1936

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    226 A.D. 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1929

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    179 A.D. 965 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1917

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    273 A.D. 757 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 1947

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    280 A.D. 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 1952

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    191 A.D. 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1920

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    219 A.D. 794 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1927

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    225 A.D. 690 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1928

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    117 A.D. 199 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1907

    (dissenting): I am in accord with the views expressed by the justice at Special Term respecting the construction to be given to the agreement entered into between the defendant, Augusta Andree (Brown) and Paul S. … Brown to assert any claim she may have to share in the personal estate of her deceased husband; and while the action is in partition and the judgment merely declares that the 3,.000 Swedish crowns, or its equivalent, and

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    146 N.Y.S. 1085 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    161 A.D. 948 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.