Opinion

Brown v. Brown

  • 191 A.D. 917
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Mar 15, 1920
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Defendant’s [plaintiff’s] former medical practice has been interrupted by military service. In the period since his discharge from the army he has not regained his former income. Hence we do not now disturb the weekly alimony as decreed. We, however, vary the judgment by adding a clause at the foot thereof that in case the circumstances of either party change, an application may then be made to the court to modify the provision for alimony. As thus varied the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.