Opinion

Brown v. Brown

  • 20 S.C. Eq. 363
Court
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Filed
Feb 15, 1847
Status
Published
Author
Dunkin
On the bench
Caldwell, Dunkin, Johnston
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Dunkin, Ch.

delivered the opinion of the Court..

The principle on which the appellant insists is very well settled. In order to prevent the bar of the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries, although it is not necessary that the trust should be created by writing, it must be manifested and proved by writing — the acknowledgment must be “ by some writing signed by the party,” &c., Steere vs. Steere, 5 J. C. R. 1. The letter of the defendant to Furze states, in so many words, that the judgment was obtained by him “ as trustee for Mrs. Susan G. Brown,” and in his answer to the complainant’s former bill, he not only admits the trust, but indignantly repels the insinuation that he had, at any time, disavowed his fiduciary relation.

It is ordered and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed.

Johnston, Ch. and Caldwell, Ch. concurred.

Appeal dismissed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.