Case law

Brown v. Brown

3 Shan. Cas. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

This canse of Simeon Cornick and wife v. Mary Brown et al. is referred *87 to in- this bill, and asked to be made exhibits and parts thereof. … See [Beeler v. Dunn], 3 Head, 90 , 91. In Roseborough v.

Brown v. Brown

34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854

. *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.

Brown v. Brown

32 S.D. 216 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1913

Brown v. Brown

12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899

defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons

Brown v. Brown

20 S.C. Eq. 363 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1847

Brown,” and in his answer to the complainant’s former bill, he not only admits the trust, but indignantly repels the insinuation that he had, at any time, disavowed his fiduciary relation.

Brown v. Brown

2 R.I. 381 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Sep 6, 1852

Brown v. Brown

6 Pa. D. & C. 698 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Jan 5, 1925

Brown v. Brown

331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

417 S.E.2d 789 (1992) 331 N.C. 383 Janet Ruth BROWN v. Elbert Ferrell BROWN. No. 85P92. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 7, 1992. Thomas B. Kakassy, Gastonia, for defendant. Lloyd T. Kelso, Gastonia, for plaintiff.

Brown v. Brown

485 So. 2d 287 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1986

Brown v. Brown

42 A.D.2d 698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1973

wherein the nature and object of Action No. 1 is to set aside a separation agreement, of Action No. 2 is to recover damages under such separation agreement, and of Action No. 3 is a Family Court support proceeding; Marlon Brown … Under the circumstances, judgment in favor of respondent Barbara Brown is premature. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Brown

20 A.D.2d 860 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1964

('See Nomako v. Ashton, 20 A D 2d 331.) .Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to ■proceed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Brown v. Brown

23 A.D.2d 829 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1965

(See TonJconogy v. J a fin, 21 A D 2d 264; People v. Hail Fellows, 23 A D 2d 734.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Brown v. Brown

247 A.D. 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1936

Brown v. Brown

226 A.D. 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1929

Brown v. Brown

179 A.D. 965 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1917

Brown v. Brown

273 A.D. 757 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 1947

Brown v. Brown

280 A.D. 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 1952

Brown v. Brown

191 A.D. 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1920

Brown v. Brown

219 A.D. 794 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1927

Brown v. Brown

225 A.D. 690 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1928