Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

8.85s

  • Hamdan v. Board of Police Commissioners

    130 S.W.3d 671 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Farish Co. v. Brown-Evans Mfg. Co.

    207 Mo. App. 78 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1921

    [Mugan v. Wheeler, 241 Mo. 376, 381 ; Campbell v. Boyers, 241 Mo. 421, 431 ; Menx v. Haller, 179 Mo. App. 466, 471 ; Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Continental National Bank, 212 Mo. 505, 516 ; Forrister v. … Sullivan, 231 Mo. 345, 352 ; Briscoe v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 222 Mo. 104, 114 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Callahan v. Board of Probation & Parole

    720 S.W.2d 445 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1986

    Pic-Walsh Freight Company v. Cooper, 618 S.W.2d 449, 453 (Mo.App.1981). The Board noted that Callahan principally relied upon Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 661 F.2d 697 (8th Cir.1981). … McCready v. Southard, 671 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Mo.App.1984). All concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ritchie v. State Board of Agriculture

    217 Mo. App. 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1924

    [Simpson v. Kansas City, 111 Mo. 237 ; Brewing Association v. St. Louis, 168 Mo. 37 ; Lester Real Estate Co. v. City of *205 St. Louis, 170 Mo. 31 ; Meadow Park Land Co. v. Kansas City, supra.] … [Gross v. Kentucky Board of Managers, 105 Ky. 840 ; King v. Kentucky Board of Pharmacy, 157 Ky. 52 ; 14 C. J. 72, 73, 78; Heller v. Stremmel, 52 Mo. 309, 312 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marshfield Community Bank v. State Banking Board

    496 S.W.2d 17 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1973

    Co. of America v. … Take an example: In Banking Board v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Kristi E. Brown, et ux. v. Elisa R. Pfeiffer

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 2024

    Blair v. Blair, 147 S.W.3d 882, 886 (Mo. … Barling v. Horn, 296 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Mo. 1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JOSHUA J. BROWN

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2023

    State v. Brown, 543 S.W.3d 647 (Mo. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DARIUS E. BROWN

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2023

    State v. Driskill, 459 S.W.3d 412, 426 (Mo. banc 2015). Our Supreme Court recently reiterated in Peterson v. … State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995). A defendant bears the burden of proving manifest injustice occurred. Brandolese, 601 S.W.3d at 526.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karen Carpenter v. State Board of Nursing

    508 S.W.3d 110 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 2016

    V, sec. 10. … In Farrar v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Horton v. Board of Education

    191 S.W.3d 687 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2006

    See Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo.banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knepper v. Bollinger

    421 S.W.2d 796 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1967

    Lyons v. Taylor, Mo.App., 333 S.W.2d 346 [4]. … See Pinger v. Guaranty Inv. Co., Mo.App., 307 S.W.2d 53 [7]. The situation is vastly, different since the adoption of MAI.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division

    348 S.W.3d 828 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2011

    Brown (Father) appeals from the judgment affirming the Decision and Order of the Department of Social Services, Family Support Division (Division), denying his claim for attorney’s fees based on a finding that the Division

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Rust v. Missouri Dental Board

    348 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 22, 1941

    Inscho v. Missouri Dental Board, 339 Mo. 547, 552 , 98 S. W. (2d) 606 ; State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health, supra, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S. W. (2d) 943 ; State v. Maher, 232 Mo. App. 998 ; 124 S. … Dental Board, 282 Mo. 292 , 221 S. W. 70 ; State ex rel. Williams v. Purl and Mo. Dental Board, 228 Mo. 1 , 128 S. W. 196 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    866 S.W.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1993

    Gale v. Moore, 763 F.2d 341, 343 (8th Cir.1985); see also Berdella v. Pender, 821 S.W.2d 846, 851 (Mo. banc 1991). … . *139 V. There is no issue of material fact. The parole board and the individual defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the summary judgment. All concur.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • McBride v. Board of Election Commissioners

    945 S.W.2d 622 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bank of Belton v. State Banking Board

    554 S.W.2d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1977

    State Banking Board relies on State ex rel. Rouveyrol v. Donnelly, 365 Mo. 686 , 285 S.W.2d 669 (banc 1956) and State ex rel. Belle-Bland Bank v. … Bingham v. Birmingham, 103 Mo. 345 , 15 S.W. 533 , 535 (1891); City of Kirkwood v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 478 S.W.2d 690, 695 [6-7] (Mo.App.1972).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of St. Joseph

    184 Mo. App. 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1914

    One of these boards had warped and the nails in the east end of the board had pulled out of the stringer allowing the board to cup up arid raise the end of the board some six inches or more above the level of the walk with … If such had been the attempt, then possibly the case of Peterie v. Railroad, 177 Mo. App. 359 , cited by appellant, might apply.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shaffer v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    523 S.W.3d 544 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM: Harry Shaffer appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief challenging the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole’s July 2014 decision setting

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delay v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    174 S.W.3d 662 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2005

    He asserted that the Board, in denying his parole, had violated his due process rights and the prohibition on ex post facto laws. The issues Delay raises were squarely decided in State ex rel Cavallaro v. … Wheat v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. Parole, 932 S.W.2d 835, 839 (Mo.App.1996); Cavallaro, 908 S.W.2d at 136 . *666 In this case, the Board denied Delay’s parole release based on the seriousness of the offense.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kennett Board of Public Works v. Shipman

    15 S.W.3d 792 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2000

    Moreover, we “ ‘review[ ] the evidence in a light most favorable to the findings and decision of the Commission and disregard[] all opposing and unfavorable evidence.’ ” Brown v. … Luft v. Schoenhoff, 935 S.W.2d 685, 687 [5] (Mo.App.1996).

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.