Opinion

Hamdan v. Board of Police Commissioners

  • 130 S.W.3d 671
  • 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 150
  • 2004 WL 193241
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Feb 3, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Crane, Hoff, Norton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in defendants’ favor granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of her amended petition and defendants’ motion to dismiss Count III of her amended petition. On appeal plaintiff challenges the disposition of Count III. We affirm.

The trial court made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its judgment. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.