Case law

People v. Schmidt

76 Misc. 2d 976 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Feb 7, 1974

(People v. Lynn, 28 N Y 2d 196; People v. Foster, 19 N Y 2d 150; People v. Griffin, 7 N Y 2d 511.) … (Penal Law, § 110.00, italics supplied; People v. Moran, 123 N. Y. 254 ; People v. Foster, 19 N Y 2d 150, supra; People v. Falu, 37 A D 2d 1025; People v. Brown, 21 A D 2d 738.)

Sevin sky, David v. Tridens Builders, LLC

2019 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 14, 2019

Ro ert V. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Westchester Trust Co.

17 Mills Surr. 413 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 23, 1916

(Schmidt v. Jewett, 127 App. Div. 376, 378 .) The case at-bar is not similar to those in Goodwin v. Ooddington ( 154 N. Y. 283 ), Matter of Brown (Id. 313) and Connelly v. O’Brien (166 id. 406 ). In Goodwin v. … Coddington and Connelly v.

In re Estate of Mulligan

4 Misc. 361 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1893

Stewart v. Brown, 31 N. Y. 350 ; Chamberlain v. Darrow, 46 Hun, 48 ; Wilcox v. Hawley, 31 N. Y. 648 . … The claim that the original act was unconstitutional because it impaired the obligation of contracts made prior to its passage. was passed upon in the Court of Appeals in the decision of the case of Morse v.

Gonzalez, Jose v. The Troxel Co.

2015 TN WC 178 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 9, 2015

Tindall v. Waring Park Ass 'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); 2 Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

In re the Estate of Toms

84 Misc. 312 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1914

Y. 522 ; Reid v. Brown, 54 Misc. Rep. 483 . They are, therefore, not subject to the provisions of law which forbid the alienation by a beneficiary of the benefits of a trust fund. In Reid v. … Brown, supra, the court (Judge Truax) cites the case of Stokes v. Cheek, 27 Beav. 620, in which it was expressly held that an annuity might be sold.

Thomas, Horace Wade v. Zipp Express

2017 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 15, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Horace Wade Thomas ) Docket No. 2015-06-0546 ) v. … See Wallis v. Brainerd Baptist Church, No. E2015-01827-SC-R11-CV, __ S.W.3d __, 2016 Tenn. LEXIS 920, at *17 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2016); Abshure v.

Nastasi v. State

194 Misc. 449 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1949

(People v. Cryan, 123 Misc. 358 ; Finigan v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 153 App. Div. 429 ; Matter of Mathewson v. Brockett, 127 Misc. 895 .) … (Finigan v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., supra; 50 C. J. S., Judgments, §§ 693, 694.) The habeas corpus proceeding presented the issue of the legality of claimant’s detention in prison.

Drake v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 080394c (or.tax 2-4-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Feb 4, 2009

Plaintiffs appealed to the county board of property tax appeals (board), and the board sustained that land value. Plaintiffs appealed that decision to this court. … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue , 4 OTR 302 , 312 (1971). "[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet his burden of proof." Reed v.

Eightway Corp. v. Dime Savings Bank

94 Misc. 2d 274 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 26, 1978

Co. v Schmitt, supra; Maisel v Schwartzbaum, 30 Misc 2d 880, 882 ; Lunt v Gennesee Val. Trust Co., 162 Misc 859 .) … (Weston v Brown, 158 NY 360, 368 ; Roberts v Ely, 113 NY 128, 131 , supra; Merino v Munoz, 99 App Div 201, 203 ; Tishman Realty & Constr. Co. v Schmitt, 69 Misc 2d 584, 590 , supra.)

Hurd, James v. Kellogg Company

2018 TN WC 207 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 26, 2018

In Thompson v. Comcast, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Recently, the Board clarified the analysis in Travis v. Carter Express, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS — (Dec. 21, 2018).

Hudgins, Natacha v. Global Personnel Solutions, Inc.

2020 TN WC App. 18 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 17, 2020

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Natacha Hudgins ) Docket No. 2017-01-0690 ) v. … Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined. W. Troy Hart and Tiffany B.

Eastland County v. Davisson

13 S.W.2d 673 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1929

Fitch, 4 Conn. 362 ; Reformed Dutch Church v. Brown, 54 Barb. (N. Y.) 191; Pinney v. Barnes, 17 Conn. 420 ; Cohen v. Clark, 44 Mont. 151 , 119 P. 775 ; Nelson v. Henrichsen, 31 Utah, 191 , 87 P. 267 ; Goldberg v. … In fact, Justice Brown tacitly recognizes the rule that it is the duty of a plaintiff to include all breaches of a single contract which have occurred at the time suit is brought.

In re the Estate of Makeever

162 Misc. 281 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 20, 1937

Y. 168 ; Low v. Harmony, 72 id. 408). It is the policy of the court to favor equality of distribution (Matter of Harden, 177 App. Div. 831 ; affd., 221 N. … (Matter of *283 Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 ; Matter of Miller, 18 App. Div. 211 ; affd., on opinion below, 155 N. Y. 646 .)

Franmar Infants Wear, Inc. v. Rios

128 Misc. 2d 996 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 10, 1985

Petitioner urges me to be guided by the Loft Board’s ruling in Matter of Bal (Loft Board order No. 153, Dec. 19,1984) in which under facts similar to the instant case, the Board stated, “With the removal of the occupant and … There is no question that the Board is to be given the respect and deference of an agency with expertise in its delegated sphere of authority. (Korn v Gleich, NYLJ, Feb. 17, 1984, p 6, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept].)

State v. Angelina County

150 S.W.2d 379 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 23, 1941

National Biscuit Co. v. State, 134 Tex. 293 , 135 S.W.2d 687, 693 . … Curry v. State, 111 Tex.Cr.R. 264 , 12 S.W.2d 796 ; Dodson v. Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 435 .

In re the Will of Dillenback

189 Misc. 538 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 8, 1947

One of the former Methodist Trustees is now on the Board of Trustees of the Presbyterian Church and there is at least one other member on the latter board who came from the former Methodist Church membership. *541 While it … (Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co., 230 N. Y. 462, 473 .) No general rule can be enunciated as to the manner in which the cy pres doctrine will be applied.

Butte Dev. Co. v. Linn County Assessor, Tc-Md 070746c (or.tax 7-31-2008)

Oregon Tax Court · Jul 31, 2008

Bancorp v. Dept. of Rev ., 15 OTR 13 , 15 (1999) (citing Mittleman v. Commission , 2 OTR 105 , 106 (1965)). See also , Johnson v. … V.

Martin v. Kieschnick

231 S.W. 330 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 1, 1921

In Graham v. McCarty & Brown, 69 Tex. 323 , 7 S. W. 342 , Judge Acker says that— “ ‘Due order of pleading’ requires that a plea in abatement should precede answer to the merits, of either law or fact, is elementary.” … Compton v. Stage Co., 25 Tex. Supp. 67 .

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Keith

208 S.W. 891 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 19, 1919

Railway v. Hill, 95 Tex. 620 , 69 S. W. 136 ; Railway v. Mohrmann, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 1 , 93 S. W. 1090 . … Railway v. Hill, supra; Railway v. Brown, 78 Tex. 397 , 14 S. W. 1034 ; Parks v. Traction Co., 100 Tex. 225 , 94 S. W. 331 , 98 S. W. 1100 ; Railway v. Haberlin, 104 Tex. 55 , 183 S. W. 873 ; Kirby Lumber Co. v.