Opinion

Sevin sky, David v. Tridens Builders, LLC

  • 2019 TN WC 77
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
May 14, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Robert Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

May 14, 2019

09:15 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT COOKEVILLE

David Sevin sky, ) Docket No.: 2018-04-0350

Employee, )

v. )

)

Tridens Builders, LLC, ) State File No.: 91341-2018

Employer, )

And )

)

Technology Ins. Co., ) Judge Robert Durham

Insurer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER AWARDING PAST TEMPORARY

DISABILITY BENEFITS

This case came before the Court for an Expedited Hearing on May 2, 2019. The

issues are whether Mr. Sevinsky is likely to prove entitlement to additional temporary

disability benefits as well as attorney's fees, and whether the matter is appropriate for

penalty review.' The Court holds Mr. Sevinsky is entitled at this stage to more temporary

disability benefits although not in the requested amount. In addition, the Court has

insufficient information to award attorney's fees at this time. Finally, Tridens and its

insurance carrier's conduct warrants penalty consideration.

History of Claim

The evidence is essentially undisputed. Mr. Sevinsky, age twenty-eight, worked

as project manager and heavy equipment operator for Tridens. On Thursday, November

8, 2018,2 he was cutting and carrying sections ofwrought iron pipe for a water-line when

1

Before the hearing, Tridens agreed to authorize treatment from Dr. Tarek Elalayli and pay all past out-

of-pocket expenses for reasonable and necessary treatment of Mr. Sevinsky's low-back pain. Tridens also

agreed to pay temporary disability benefits from March 25, 2019, which was when Dr. E1alayli took Mr.

Sevin sky off work until he had an MRI. The parties agreed to an average weekly wage of $662.11.

2

On cross-examination, Mr. Sevinsky acknowledged that various medical records list slightly different

1

he felt sudden pain down his back and into his leg. Although he kept working, he

stopped cutting pipe. He testified that he had never experienced problems with his back

before November 8. The next day, he told his supervisor, Justin Heck, that his back hurt,

although he didn't tell him how the injury occurred. 3

Over the weekend, Mr. Sevinsky rested, but on Monday morning his back pain

was so severe he could not get out of bed. He called Mr. Heck and reported he suffered a

work injury the previous Thursday. Mr. Heck replied that, since he did not report it on

Thursday, workers' compensation insurance would not cover it. Thus, Tridens would

"self-pay" the medical expenses, and they would consider it a "learning experience."

Tridens directed Mr. Sevinsky to Midtown Healthcare, where he received treatment on

November 14.

At Midtown, Mr. Sevinsky saw Nurse Practitioner Chad James. He told N.P.

James that he hurt his back "handling heavy steel at work," which caused back pain

radiating into his leg. N.P. James diagnosed a low-back strain and muscle spasm. He

prescribed medication and told Mr. Sevinsky he could go back to work if his symptoms

did not worsen.

However, Mr. Sevinsky testified his symptoms did worsen. This resulted in a trip

to the emergency room the next day due to severe back pain radiating into both legs. He

underwent a CT scan, which revealed broad-based disc bulges in his low back. Although

Mr. Sevinsky testified that providers told him to rest and see a specialist, the records do

not contain these recommendations.

In any event, Mr. Sevinsky did not return to work. He testified he had several

conversations and text exchanges with Mr. Heck and Kyle Knight, Tridens' H.R.

manager, about additional medical care and disability benefits, but his requests were to

no ·avail. At some point, Tridens offered him work sitting in a truck counting truckloads,

but he believed it to be a one-time assignment, and he did not feel he could sit in one

position for that long, so he declined.

On November 28, Mr. Sevinsky filed a Petition for Benefit Determination.

Tridens then stated it filed a claim with its carrier, Technology Insurance. On November

30, Mr. Sevinsky received a letter from Technology informing him that it received notice

of his claim. However, he testified that Technology never provided any benefits.

dates for the injury, and that he once called his supervisor to ask when the injury occurred. He testified

that, while he was not sure of the actual date when he reported it to the medical providers, he knew that it

was Thursday of that week.

3

Mr. Sevinsky admitted on cross-examination that the statement in his affidavit that he told Mr. Heck

about his injury on the day it occurred was incorrect.

2

On December 6, Mr. Sevinsky returned to the emergency room with continued

complaints. The next day, he went on his own to see N.P. Jennefer Dixon at Carthage

Family Wellness. N.P. Dixon, who is supervised by Dr. Richard Rutherford, placed Mr.

Sevinsky under restrictions of no lifting more than ten pounds for six weeks. Mr.

Sevinsky took the restrictions to Tridens and spoke with Mr. Knight and Lauren Beth

Heck, the office manager .. He testified they told him that since the restrictions were not

written by an authorized provider, they could not honor them, nor could they return him

to work. However, they provided him with their own panel of back specialists from

which to choose an authorized physician.

Mr. Sevinsky immediately tried to set an appointment with Dr. Tarek Elalayli, one

of the doctors on the list, but was told Technology must schedule it. However, after

several weeks and multiple attempts to communicate with the adjuster, Technology never

authorized a visit. So, with his attorney's help, Mr. Sevinsky finally scheduled a visit

with Dr. Elalayli for March 25, 2019.

Dr. Elalayli determined that, based on his examination and Mr. Sevinsky's history,

Mr. Sevinsky likely suffers from a disc herniation due to an injury at work. He

recommended an MRI and took Mr. Sevinsky off work until it could be performed. Mr.

Sevinsky testified that Technology received this report, but it did not authorize further

visits with Dr. Elalayli until the day before the hearing.

Mr. Sevinsky also testified that he has not worked since November 8, 2018. He

stated that sitting in one position, as well as the jostling and bouncing involved in using

heavy equipment, would have been impossible to endure. In addition, his job required

regular physical labor that would have exceeded his restrictions.

Mr. Sevinsky also introduced Dr. Rutherford's affidavit, in which he gave his

opinion that Mr. Sevinsky suffers from a "herniated lumbar disc, lumbar back pain with

radiculopathy affecting his left leg, and left foot drop." He concurred with N.P. Dixon's

lifting restriction and recommendation that Mr. Sevinsky contact Tridens or Technology

for a specialist referral. Finally, Mr. Sevinsky's counsel, Greg Groth, presented an

itemization stating that he spent 21.75 hours representing him up to the expedited

hearing.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Sevinsky does not have to prove every element of his claim by a

preponderance of the evidence to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, he must

present sufficient evidence that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing,

2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

3

Given Tridens' concessions, the only issue concerning benefits is whether Mr.

Sevinsky is entitled to temporary disability benefits from November 12, 2018, to March

24, 2019. To receive these benefits, Mr. Sevinsky must show he is likely to prove: (1) a

disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection

between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of

disability. See Shepherd v. Haren Canst. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016).

Here, Mr. Sevinsky testified that the emergency room providers took him off work

on November 15. However, he did not provide any medical proof to that effect. These

emergency room records do not mention work status. Except in the most obvious cases,

expert medical opinion is required to establish the elements above. See Young v. Young

Elec. Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 41, at *13 (Sept. 14, 2016). Thus, the

Court holds Mr. Sevinsky has not established entitlement to temporary total disability

benefits before December 10, 2018.

However, Mr. Sevinsky did provide sufficient evidence to show he is likely to

prove temporary partial disability from December 10, 20 18, through January 18, 2019.

Dr. Rutherford's affidavit confirmed that on December 10, N.P. Dixon placed Mr.

Sevinsky under a ten-pound lifting restriction for six weeks due to low back pain and

radiculopathy. He agreed with the restriction.

As to causation, Dr. Rutherford confirmed his office's instructions that Mr.

Sevinsky contact his "workers' compensation carrier and/or employer" to schedule an

appointment with a specialist. In addition, Dr. Elalayli's record stated that Mr.

Sevinsky's back pain and radiculopathy were "likely" due to a lumbar disc herniation

caused by an injury at work. When this evidence is combined with Mr. Sevinsky's

testimony, the Court holds it is sufficient to establish the likelihood that Mr. Sevinsky

will be able to prove causation at trial.

Finally, Mr. Sevinsky's undisputed testimony is that he took his restriction to his

supervisors, and they said they could not return him to work under unauthorized

restrictions. The Court therefore holds that Mr. Sevinsky has established he is likely to

prove entitlement to temporary partial disability benefits from December 10, 20 18,

through January 18, 2019.

The next issue is Mr. Sevinsky's request for attorney's fees pursuant to Tennessee

Code Annotated section 50-6-226(d)(1)(B). The Court cannot award fees at this time.

While Mr. Groth submitted an itemization of the time pursuing benefits for Mr. Sevinsky,

it was not accompanied by an affidavit attesting to the reasonableness and necessity of

the time or differentiating between Mr. Groth's time and that of his staff. Further, he did

not include a sworn statement as to his hourly fee or the reasonableness of his fee given

Mr. Groth's expertise and experience and the fees normally charged by attorneys within

4

the community. Thus, the Court defers any award of attorney's fees until this

information is properly before it.

Finally, Mr. Sevinsky requests a penalty assessment. Given Tridens' and its

carrier's apparent failure to meet their obligations under section 50-6-204, the Court finds

the request well-taken and refers this matter to the Compliance Unit for investigation.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Tridens shall pay to Mr. Sevinsky past temporary partial disability benefits in the

amount of $3,972.66.

2. Mr. Sevinsky's request for attorney's fees is denied at this time.

3. This claim shall be referred to the Compliance Unit for investigation and

determination as to whether a penalty is appropriate.

4. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on July 9, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. C.S.T.

The parties or their counsel must call615-253-0010 or toll-free at 855-689-9049 to

participate in the hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the

issues without your participation.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance

with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no

later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the

necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty

assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please

contact the Workers' Compensation Compliance Unit by email at

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED MAY 14,2019.

Ro ert V. Durham, Judge

Co,rt of Workers' Compensation Claims

5

X

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.