Case law

Arias v. State

8 Misc. 3d 736 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 14, 2005

Friedman testified that he has been licensed to practice medicine in New York State since 1976 and is board certified in neurology, psychiatry and neurophysiology. … In Maracallo v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y. ( 2 Misc 3d 703 [2003]), the court determined that the mother of a 14-year-old boy who died by drowning in a wave pool while on a school field trip to an amusement park was entitled

Delaney, Aaron v, TPI Corporation

2017 TN WC 176 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 14, 2017

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … As the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board explained in McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

North Texas Building & Loan Ass'n v. Overton

86 S.W.2d 738 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 23, 1935

Silliman v. Gammage, 55 Tex. 365 ; Browne v. King, *741 111 Tex. 330 , 235 S. W. 522 ; R. B. Spencer & Co. v. May (Tex. Civ. App.) 78 S. W.(2d) 665 (writ ref.).

Franmar Infants Wear, Inc. v. Rios

128 Misc. 2d 996 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 10, 1985

Petitioner urges me to be guided by the Loft Board’s ruling in Matter of Bal (Loft Board order No. 153, Dec. 19,1984) in which under facts similar to the instant case, the Board stated, “With the removal of the occupant and … There is no question that the Board is to be given the respect and deference of an agency with expertise in its delegated sphere of authority. (Korn v Gleich, NYLJ, Feb. 17, 1984, p 6, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept].)

Garma v. Township of Lakewood

14 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 22, 1994

Id. at 258 , 584 A.2d 807 (citing Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989)). … Hooper v.

Opinion No. 78-298 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 4, 1979

All departments, instrumentalities and institutions of this state and divisions thereof, counties and divisions thereof, public trusts, boards of education and incorporated cities or towns and divisions thereof, shall carry … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. State Board of Education, 197 Okl. 141 , 169 P.2d 295 (1946).

Morrissey v. Chesebrough-Ponds

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 16, 1999

Johnson School/Scotland County Board of Education is self-insured through North Carolina School Boards Insurance Trust with Educator Benefit Services as the servicing agency. 4. … Caulder v. Waverly Mills , 314 N.C. 70 , 331 S.E.2d 646 (1985); Neal v. Leslie Fay, Inc. , 78 N.C. App. 117 , 336 S.E.2d 628 (1985). 2.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 1989

I MUST POINT OUT INITIALLY THAT THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT HAD OCCASION TO CONSTRUE THIS STATUTE IN BOARD OF EDUCATION OF DEP. SCH. DIST. NO. 23 OSAQE COUNTY V. ALLEN, 615 P.2D 1009 (OKLA. 1980). … IN KRAMER V.

Sevin sky, David v. Tridens Builders, LLC

2019 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 14, 2019

Ro ert V. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Worden v. State

2 Misc. 2d 955 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1956

(Grant v. State of New York, 192 Misc. 45 .) … (Stanley v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of Piermont, 168 Misv. 797; Gates v. State of New York, 128 N. Y. 221 ; People v. Peck, 67 Hun 560 ; Fink v. Wallach, 47 Misc. 247 ; Matter of Norton, 25 Misc. 48 ; Sweeney v.

Harrell v. Chevrolet

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 5, 2010

Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. , 129 N.C. App. 361 , 364 , 499 S.E.2d 197 , 199 (1998). 3. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. , supra . 4.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bucklin & Clark

2 Connoly 548 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1891

Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 142 . … In the case of Brown v.

Schmohl v. State

141 Misc. 274 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 9, 1931

The case of Lewis v. State ( 197 App. … No such finding can be made in this case as the military board found it was caused in the line of duty and the court finds that a failure to properly inspect the gun before loading on the truck was negligence.

Garassino, Louis v. Western Express, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 59 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 7, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Louis Garassino ) Docket No. 2014-07-0013 ) v. … See Keen v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1990

Sappington v. Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County, 273 P. 274,280 (Okla. 1928). … This prospect is raised by an older case, Sanders v. Board of Commissioners of Delaware County 15 P.2d 818 (Okla. 1932).

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1989

That Act required an applicant for licensure with the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Examiners (now the Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision) to be or to intend to become a citizen of the United States. … In Frazier v.

In re the Estate of Toms

84 Misc. 312 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1914

Y. 522 ; Reid v. Brown, 54 Misc. Rep. 483 . They are, therefore, not subject to the provisions of law which forbid the alienation by a beneficiary of the benefits of a trust fund. In Reid v. … Brown, supra, the court (Judge Truax) cites the case of Stokes v. Cheek, 27 Beav. 620, in which it was expressly held that an annuity might be sold.

Hudgins, Natacha v. Global Personnel Solutions, Inc.

2020 TN WC App. 18 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 17, 2020

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Natacha Hudgins ) Docket No. 2017-01-0690 ) v. … Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined. W. Troy Hart and Tiffany B.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Westchester Trust Co.

17 Mills Surr. 413 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 23, 1916

(Schmidt v. Jewett, 127 App. Div. 376, 378 .) The case at-bar is not similar to those in Goodwin v. Ooddington ( 154 N. Y. 283 ), Matter of Brown (Id. 313) and Connelly v. O’Brien (166 id. 406 ). In Goodwin v. … Coddington and Connelly v.

In re the Estate of Frank

153 Misc. 688 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 7, 1934

(Brown v. Richter, 25 App. Div. 239, 243 ; Pratt v. Prentice, 166 id. 906, 907; affd., 221 N. Y. 707 .) The sole remaining question relates to the disposition of the remainder following the death of the son.