Case law

119 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Berkhout

135 Misc. 2d 773 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 2, 1987

That the convenant is implied rather than express does not affect the applicability of CPLR 5001 (a) (Delulio v 320-57 Corp., 99 AD2d 253 [interest on award of damages for breach of warranty of habitability]; Isaacs v Incentive … The litigation here began in the Supreme Court, traveled to the Loft Board, and from there to the Appellate Division, and ultimately back to the Supreme Court.

Evans v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 14, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 5.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1975

OPINION — AG — ** LEGISLATOR DOING BUSINESS WITH CITY ** THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF WHICH YOU ARE PART OWNER AND THE CITY OF EDMOND WOULD `NOT' CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE V , SECTION … A MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATOR MAY LEGALLY DO BUSINESS WITH A CITY, TOWN OR LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD SO LONG AS NEITHER HIS COMPENSATION NOR THE ACTIVITY WHICH GENERATES SUCH BUSINESS IS FUNDED BY APPROPRIATION FROM THE STATE LEGISLATURE

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilmore

127 Misc. 518 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1926

See, also, Lambert v. Craft ( 98 N. … (Matter of Everts [also entitled Matter of Stevenson], 86 Hun, 325 ; Marre v. Ginochio, 2 Bradf. 165 .) As to the conversation with regard to this alleged $100, the language of the court in Marre v.

Antunez, Christian Torres v. MG Dyess, Inc.

2026 TN WC App. 33 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 29, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Christian Torres Antunez Docket No. 2025-80-2021 v. … Copper & Aluminum Co. v. Dickey, 493 S.W.2d 463, 465 (Tenn. 1973).

Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey City

19 N.J. Tax 538 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 10, 2000

Stafford Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 154 N.J. 62, 74 , 711 A.2d 282 (1998) (citations omitted).] … In Kibble v.

St. Luke's Village, Inc. v. Peapack & Gladstone Borough

11 N.J. Tax 76 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 20, 1990

The 1988 assessment was affirmed by judgment of the Somerset County Board of Taxation. I. … The two newer buildings were constructed pursuant to a variance granted by the board of adjustment of the taxing district and site plan approval by the planning board.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Churchill

212 S.W. 155 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1919

McDowell v. Fowler, 80 Tex. 587 , 16 S. W. 431 ; Carlton v. Krueger, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 48 , 115 S. W. 619 , 1178. … W. 1123 ; Railway v. Hibbitts, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 419 , 109 S. W. 228 ; Traction Co. v. Bryant, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 437 , 70 S. W. 1015 .

In re the Estate of DeForest

172 Misc. 515 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 22, 1939

(Lafrinz v. Whitney, 233 N. Y. 107 ; Givens v. Whitney , Id. 665.) … Unlike the latter, the petitioner was furnished with a cottage on the estate where he and his wife resided and furnished table board for certain of the other employees.

Serbalik v. State

204 Misc. 2 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 23, 1953

(Mullen v. St. John, 57 N. Y. 567 ; Covey v. State of New York, 200 Misc. 340 ; Platt v. Erie Co. Agric. Soc., 164 App. Div. 99,101 ; Reinzi v. Tilyou, 252 N. Y. 97 ; Goldstein v. Pullman Co., 220 N. Y. 549, 554 .) … (Robinson v. Consolidated Gas Co., 194 N. Y. 37 ; Griffen v. Manice, 166 N. Y. 188 ; Whitcher v. Board of Educ. of City of *6 Rensselaer, 236 App. Div. 293 ; 1 Warren on Negligence in the New York Courts, pp. 103, 105.)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1975

106 P.2d 549 (1910), THE LEGISLATURE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE A SPECIFIC PERIOD OF TIME "AFTER CONVICTION" FOR A CRIMINAL OFFENSE, DURING THE PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD … CITE: SECTION 36, ARTICLE V; 57 O.S. 1971 332.7 [ 57-332.7 ](GERALD E. WEIS) ** ARTICLE VI, SECTION 10 ARTICLE VI, SECTION 36

Miller v. State

13 Misc. 2d 475 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 29, 1957

Div. 580 ; La Rue v. Tiernan, 260 App. Div. 337 ; Brown v. State of New York, 308 N. Y. 980 ; Sletten v. State of New York, 282 App. Div. 751 ; Schill v. State of New York, 258 App. Div. 769 ; Taylor v. … Y. 542 ; Graf v. State of New York, 287 N. Y. 594 ; Cook v. State of New York, 301 N. Y. 780 ). The State was negligent and its negligence was the actual or proximate cause of the accident.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1979

Hawkins v. … The Court cited with approval the following language from State ex rel State Aeronautics Commission v. Board of Examiners of State, 124 Mont. 402 , 194 P.2d 633 , 638 , as follows: "`. . .

Opinion No. 79-195 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1979

Hawkins v. … The Court cited with approval the following language from State ex rel State Aeronautics Commission v. Board of Examiners of State, 124 Mont. 402 , 194 P.2d 633 , 638 , as follows: " ' . . .

In re Meeker

135 Misc. 774 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 2, 1929

the benefit of Leverich Realty Corporation and the subsidiary companies; that he mil use his best endeavors to assist in raising further moneys for Leverich Realty Corporation; that he will accept the chairmanship of its board … is void against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee of the same interest or any part thereof, in good faith and for a valuable consideration, whose conveyance or mortgage is first duly recorded. * * * ” It was held in Brown

Opinion No. 77-106 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1977

City of Tulsa v. Mayes, 174 Okl. 286 , 51 P.2d 266 (1935); Sublett v. City of Tulsa, 405 P.2d 185 (Okl. 1965). … Board of County Commissioners v. Warrarn, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okl. 1955), dealt with "the validity of a trust instrument and the powers, duties, and liabilities thereunder."

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 2004

Grand Jury v. … Co. v. Excise Board, 34 P.2d 274 , 276 (Okla. 1934). See A.G. Opin. 88-109, 235-36.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1999

Id. at 810. ¶ 11 See also Oklahoma State Election Board v. … See New Motor Vehicle Board v. Orrin W.

Ducros, James v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc.

2017 TN WC App. 60 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 17, 2017

See Seiber v. Reeves Logging, 284 S.W.3d 294, 298 (Tenn. 2009); Hadzic v. … Lindsey v.

Hedges v. Whitehall Manufacturing Co.

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 137 · New York Marine Court · Apr 5, 1879

A majority of the executive committee of the Whitehall Manufacturing Company authorized Stanley, Brown & Clarke to appear herein, for said corporation, and this was sufficient to justify the service by them of the demurrer … Noyes, 6 Johns. 296 ; Hamilton v. Wright, 37 N. Y. 502, 505 ). The plaintiff was irregular in his practice, and without considering any other question in the case (see Snape v.