Opinion

Hedges v. Whitehall Manufacturing Co.

  • 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 137
Court
New York Marine Court
Filed
Apr 5, 1879
Status
Published
Author
McAdam
On the bench
McAdam
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.7%

The opinion

McAdam, J.

A majority of the executive committee of the Whitehall Manufacturing Company authorized Stanley, Brown & Clarke to appear herein, for said corporation, and this was sufficient to justify the service by them of the demurrer, and their appearance must be treated as regular until the corporation itself, in some authoritative form, elects to question it. I do not mean to deny the power of the court, upon proper application made for the purpose, to require an attorney, under certain circumstances, to produce his authority to act in the particular matter at issue, but hold- that the plaintiff himself has no power to decide the question, in advance of such an application, in the expectation that his decision will be sustained, for an appearance by a responsible attorney is good until set aside, both as to the court and as to him (Denton v. Noyes, 6 Johns. 296 ; Hamilton v. Wright, 37 N. Y. 502, 505 ).

The plaintiff was irregular in his practice, and without considering any other question in the case (see Snape v. Gilbert, 13 Hun, 494 ), the motion to set aside the judgment will be granted, with $10 costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.