Case law

Cole v. the City of Greensboro

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Braswell v. N.C. AT University , 5 N.C. App. 1 , 168 S.E.2d 24 (1969); Jenkins v. Department of Motor Veh. , 244 N.C. 560 , 94 S.E.2d 577 (1956). 8.

Basham, Alexis v. SPB Hospitality, LLC, d/b/a Logan's Roadhouse

2023 TN WC App. 49 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 2, 2023

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … Coleman v. Olson, 551 S.W.3d 686, 694 (Tenn. 2018) (internal citations omitted).

In re Edgar L.

66 Misc. 2d 142 · New York Family Court · Apr 6, 1971

The Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference has not adopted any rules dealing with discovery devices in the Family Court proceedings. CPLB 3042 (subd. … (People v. Florence, 146 Misc. 735 [1933].) If full meaning is to be given to section 165 of the Family Court Act, discovery should be granted to the extent it is appropriate in juvenile delinquency proceedings.

Mandelbaum v. Local 1101, CWA

108 Misc. 2d 7 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 10, 1981

Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Amer. v National Labor Relations Bd. (506 F2d 1382) the court reversed the National Labor Relations Board and *10 upheld the validity of an employer-financed … “To require the States to yield to the primary jurisdiction of the National Board does not ensure Board adjudication of the status of a disputed activity.

Osborne, Jr, Alonzo v. Beacon Transport, LLC

2016 TN WC 180 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 8, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … As the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board explained in McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, No. 2015-08-0218, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at *4-5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Hallock v. Teller

2 Dem. Sur. 206 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1882

(Bowen v. Bowen, 2 Bradf., 336 ; Dye v. Kerr, 15 Barb., 444 ; Robinson v. Cushman, 2 Den., 149 ; Sharp v. Cropsey, 11 Barb., 224 ; Conger v. Van Aernum, 43 Barb., 602 ; Wilcox v. … Wilcox, 48 Barb., 327 ; Matter of Teyn, 2 Redf., 306 ; Keller v. Stuck, 4 Redf., 297 ; Van Kuren v. Saxton, 3 Hun, 547 ; Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y., 312 ; Kearney v. McKeon, 85 N. Y., 139 ).

Treacy v. State

131 Misc. 2d 849 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1986

This disposition was reviewed and affirmed by the Departmental Review Board on December 29, 1983. … Claimant’s attempt on this motion to characterize the negligent investigation action as one for abuse of process is without merit; among other deficiencies the claim fails to allege actual or special damages (Board of Educ

Moody, Stacy v. Cumberland Cty. Sch. Dis.

2018 TN WC 169 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 17, 2018

Hackney v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *8-9 (July 22, 2016). … See Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Earhart v. Commonwealth

36 Va. 671 · General Court of Virginia · Dec 15, 1839

Tefft v. Commonwealth, 8 Leigh 721 . Myers v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. Cas. 160 . As to the motion for a new trial, the court below did not err. … And according to the case of Shadradc Brown, * decided by this court at December term 1838 (3 Rob.

Mchale v. State

198 Misc. 387 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1950

Co. v. Kirkover, 176 N. Y. 301 ; Flynn v. New York, W. & B. Ry Co., 218 N. Y. 140 ; County of Erie v. Fridenberg, 221 N. Y. 389 ; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of New York, 277 N. Y. 452, 456 .) … (Board of Supervisors of Hamilton County v. Lawrence Brook Corp., 245 App. Div. 892 .)

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lowerre

104 Misc. 570 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1918

Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 N. Y. 573 ; Cammann v. Bailey, 210 id. 19; Herzog v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 177 id. 86; Matter of Brown, 180 App. Div. 903 . … Matter of Brown, 154 N. Y. 331 .

Vanveldhuizen, John v. Crown Automotive Group, Inc.

2019 TN WC 3 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 8, 2019

In Morgan v. Macy’s, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd LEXIS 35, at *17 (Aug. 31, 2016), the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board held that this presumption is rebuttable by a showing of the preponderance of the evidence. … Venable v. Superior Essex, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 56, at *6 (Nov. 2, 2016).

Smith v. Parkchester North Condominium

163 Misc. 2d 66 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 28, 1994

In reaching its determination the court in McMunn v Steppingstone Mgt. Corp. … This holding does not conflict with the decision reached in Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt. (supra).

Hobby, Sven v. Sumner County Ornamental

2021 TN WC 228 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 16, 2021

Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 694-95 (Tenn. 2014). Mr. Hobby displayed none of these characteristics. Due to the credibility deficiency, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. 73-318 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 3, 1974

Title 62 O.S. 79 [ 62-79 ] (1971) states in part: "All moneys that shall be received during any calendar month by any State Officer, State Board, State Commission or the members or employees of either thereof, accruing as … See Boice v. State, 473 P.2d 241 (Okl., 1970). In this instance, 62 O.S. 7 .1 [ 62-7.1 ] (1973) states that all moneys shall be deposited in an agency clearing account or an agency special account.

Beekman v. Vanderveer

3 Dem. Sur. 619 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1885

Hubbard, 6 Met., 50 ; Pollard v. Pollard, 1 Allen, 490 ; Gaw v. Hoffman, 12 Gratt., 628 ; Howard v. Frances, 30 N. J. Eq., 444; Potter v. Brown, 11 R. I., 232; Lord v. Lord, 23 Ct., 327; Loocock v. … But it would be presumptuous for me to act upon that theory, in the face of the decisions of the Court of Chancery, and of the Supreme Court, in Isenhart v. Brown, Sanford v. Sanford, and Babcock v.

Opinion No. 69-334 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1969

Under the provisions of 26 O.S. 423 .6 [26-423.6] (1969), any club or organization composed of the electorate which attempts to elect its candidates to office must file a report with the appropriate election board showing … Hampton v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 (1955).

Opinion No. 75-332 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1976

Smith v. State, Okl. Cr., 381 P.2d 900 (1963), states as follows: "The county . . . is a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma. … Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute (Tulsa Exposition Fair Corp. v.

Lawson, Charles v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

2022 TN WC App. 18 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 10, 2022

Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. W. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Sherfield v. Unknown

2010 Ohio 4962 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 14, 2010

[Cite as Sherfield v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-4962.] … The entry directed the plaintiff to file an amended complaint which names a state department, board, office, commission, agency, institution, or other state instrumentality as defendant on or before April 23, 2010, or face