Case law

Turnage, Clarence v. Dole Referigerating Co., Inc.

2019 TN WC 18 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 4, 2019

Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. … Noah and Sarah disagree, relying on Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co., 530 S.W.2d 283 (Tenn. 1975), and Stamps v. Trinity Marine Prods., Inc., 2016 Tenn. LEXIS 184 (Tenn. Workers Comp. Panel March 22, 2016).

Patton, Ashley v. General Motors

2016 TN WC 288 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2016

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). Ms. … As stated in Dorsey v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2015-01-0017, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 13, at *9, 10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

Lee, Courtney v. Federal Express Corporation

2022 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 5, 2022

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Simmons, David v. Konrad Construction

2026 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 2, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD David Simmons Docket No. 2025-80-6051 v. … Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009).

Scales, Elijah v. Michael Sherlock

2016 TN WC 141 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 7, 2016

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 4 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)). 2 The Court finds Mr. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review

Hawkins v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 20, 1998

The Supreme Court held in Lockwood v. … Swinker is board certified in both family medicine and occupational medicine. Swinker Depo. at 6-8 (hereafter S. Depo. at ___). Dr. Gwinn is board certified in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

Martella v. Emergency Medical Associates, Ltd.

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 644 · Pennsylvania Arbitration Panels for Health Care · Aug 2, 1978

In Brown v. … In other words Doctor Kelly could be regarded as having the status of an independent contractor in his relation to the partners in the Sanitarium but in his relation to Brown would be deemed an employee of the Sanitarium.

Fonfa v. State

88 Misc. 2d 343 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 4, 1976

My answer is: No. *346 Historically, in this State our court was preceded by a Board of Claims. … Over 60 years ago, the Appellate Division, Third Department, had affirmed the board’s award of damages to forest owners for destruction of trees by beaver.

Mulligan v. Omar Gasoline Co.

49 S.W.2d 706 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 16, 1932

Ritnour, however, made weekly reports to the board of trustees, concerning the business. … Maddox Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 23 S.W.(2d) 333 ; Marshburn v. Stewart, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S. W. 942 , 260 S. W. 565 .

Princeton Campus Club v. Princeton Borough

4 N.J. Tax 632 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1982

Each assessment had been appealed to the Mercer County Board of Taxation and each assessment was affirmed by the county board in a separate judgment. … See Pleasantville Taxpayers v. Pleasantville, 115 N.J.Super. 85 , 278 A.2d 229 (App.Div.1971), certif. den. 59 NJ. 268, 281 A.2d 530 (1971).

In re the Estate of Dettmer

177 Misc. 349 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1941

The language of the will then continues: “ The title to said property shall be vested in the County of Miami, or in such other Board, body or corporation as the laws of Ohio or any special legislation which may be enacted … (Fowler v. Coates, 201 N. Y. 257, 262 ; Vail v. Long Island R. R. Co., 106 id. 283, 287 ; Calvary Presbyterian Church v. Putnam, 249 id. 111, 115; Mott v. Richtmyer, 57 id. 49, 66; Beardslee v.

In re the Will of Jerge

180 Misc. 268 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 30, 1943

(Matter of Shulslty, 120 Misc. 232 ; Starr v. Starr, 132 N. Y. 154 ; Phillips v. Davies, 92 N. Y. 199 ; Eidt v. Eidt, 203 N. Y. 325, 328 .) … It was said in Soper v. Brown ( 136 N.

Opinion No. 89-500 (1990) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1990

IN WHITE V. … SEE WASHINGTON V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 752 F.2D 1465 (9TH CIR. 1984) (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS INAPPLICABLE TO INDIAN COUNTRY); SANTA ROSA BAND OF INDIANS V.

LaGuardia, Kathleen Delores v. Total Holdings USA, Inc. d/b/a Hutchinson Sealing Systems

2017 TN WC App. 70 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 29, 2017

See Wallis v. … .”); Swift & Co. v.

Gellman v. Hotel Corp. of America

46 Misc. 2d 521 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 26, 1965

Where such an action resulted from a tort, intentional or not, interest was denied (De Long Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 20 A D 2d 104, 107). … Foltis Fisher, Inc., 152 Misc. 24 ; Brown v. Godefroy Mfg. Co., 278 App. Div. 242 ), legislative intent in the enactment of the CPLR not having clearly been proven to the contrary.

In re the Final Account of the Administration of the Estate of Seymour

112 Misc. 216 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1920

In Bullock v. … In Matter of Brown, N. Y. L. J. Dec. 23, 1919, Surrogate Cohalan granted motion for bills of particulars to the extent of requiring contestants to give names of persons alleged to have exerted undue influence.

Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. Landis

22 Pa. D. & C.4th 309 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Nov 15, 1994

This board issued an opinion and order on September 10, 1992, entering a partial default adjudication which established Landis’ liability for the violations alleged in the complaint. See DER v. … DER v. Canada-PA Ltd., 1989 EHB 319.

Kent, Robert v. Delatorre Art Design, Inc.

2019 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 4, 2019

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … See Wright v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1989

proposed by a resolution of the governing body, the notice required under 11 O.S. 13 -11 (2) is spelled out in 11 O.S. 13 -106 which provides as follows: Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the proposed charter from the board … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985). Where the meaning of the statute is clear and unambiguous there is no room for further construction to determine legislative intent Fuller v.

Morton, Dustin v. Morsey Constructors, dba Harper Industries

2021 TN WC 200 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 15, 2021

See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 19, at *8-9 (Apr. 20, 2016).