Case law

Nams Holdings, LLC v. Reece

2018 NCBC 32 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 16, 2018

Id. at *19; see also Brown v. LiveOps, Inc., 903 A.2d 324, 328, 330 (Del. … See Brown, 903 A.2d at 329–30; see also Holley, 2014 Del. Ch. LEXIS 268, at *27; Pontone v. Milso Indus. Corp., 100 A.3d 1023, 1051 (Del. Ch. 2014). 41.

Bunch v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 3, 2008

. § 143-291 confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of … Stat. § 143-291 et seq. ; Ayscue v. Highway Commission , 270 N.C. 100 , 153 S.E.2d 823 (1967); Woolard v. DOT , 93 N.C. App. 214 , 377 S.E.2d 267 , cert. denied , 325 N.C. 230 , 381 S.E.2d 792 (1989). 2.

Bailey, Marie v. Amazon

2022 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 3, 2022

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Marie P. … Blevins v. Pearson Hardwood Flooring Co., 144 S.W.2d 781, 783 (Tenn. 1940); see also Hughes v.

In re the Will of Hemstreet

101 Misc. 340 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1917

color, subject to the visitation and inspection on such days as shall be fixed by the Board of Managers to all visitors and by an authorized representative of the State Board of Charities. … Corrigan v.

Seagrave Establishment, Inc. v. Goldberg

130 Misc. 2d 467 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 10, 1985

(See, Lyndhurst Assoc. v Drachman, 130 Misc 2d 255 .) … Elwick Ltd. v. Howard, [ 111 AD2d 73 ]; Ziess v. Semenov, [ 126 Misc 2d 917 ]; OHA, Sec. 41, Sec. 55)” (emphasis added).

Smith, Patricia v. Healthcare Service Group

2019 TN WC 68 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 26, 2019

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

GOodman, Deborah v. Schwartz Paper Company

2016 TN WC 257 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 31, 2016

Scott v. Integrity Stajj!ng Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review.

Bunch v. N.C. Dept of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 23, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Lee v. Roses , 16 2 N.C. App. 129 , 132 , 590 S.E.2d 404 , 407 (2004) [quoting Wilder v. Wilder , 14 6 N.C. App. 574 , 578 , 553 S.E.2d 425 , 428 (2001)].

Jewell, Kevin v. Cobble Construction & Arcus Restoration

2015 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 12, 2015

Service v. Rodell, 42 S.W.3d 846, 865 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) (citing Coakley v. Daniels, 840 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)). … Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc., 272 S.W.3d 560, 575 (Tenn. 2008); Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co., 722 S.W.2d 380, 383 (Tenn. 1986); Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978).

Phillips v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2016 Ohio 7061 · Ohio Court of Claims · Aug 16, 2016

Brown v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 13AP-804, 2014-Ohio-1810, ¶ 13. … Brown at ¶ 13, citing Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 (1988). {¶19} “The use of force is sometimes necessary to control inmates.” Jodrey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist.

Outdoor Meida Properties, Inc. v. Pawlisheck

Massachusetts Land Court · Apr 29, 2021

In the prior litigation, Albahari v. Board of Appeals of Brewster, 2004 Mass. App. Lexis 516, 61 Mass. App. … Corp. v.

Strawn v. State Tax Commission

1 Or. Tax 98 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 6, 1962

ORS 18.210; Coin v. Chute, 126 Or 466 , 260 P 998 , 270 P 492 (1928); Chance v. Carter, 81 Or 229 , 158 P 947 (1916); Currie v. Southern Pacific Co., 23 Or 400 , 31 P 964 (1893). … Justice RossMAN.in Goin v. Chute, supra, in quoting from Reed v. Rocap, 9 N.J.

Scales, Elijah v. Michael Sherlock

2016 TN WC 141 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 7, 2016

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 4 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)). 2 The Court finds Mr. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review

Grand Temple & Tabernacle in the State of Texas of the Knights & Daughters of Tabor of the International Order of Twelve v. Independent Order of Knights & Daughters of Tabor of America

44 S.W.2d 973 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

As said by Judge Leddy in Vogel v. … Gainesville Water Co. v. City of Gainesville, 103 Tex. 394 , 128 S. W. 370 . *978 In Grand Fraternity v. Melton, 102 Tex. 399 , 117 S.

In re the Estate of Dettmer

177 Misc. 349 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1941

The language of the will then continues: “ The title to said property shall be vested in the County of Miami, or in such other Board, body or corporation as the laws of Ohio or any special legislation which may be enacted … (Fowler v. Coates, 201 N. Y. 257, 262 ; Vail v. Long Island R. R. Co., 106 id. 283, 287 ; Calvary Presbyterian Church v. Putnam, 249 id. 111, 115; Mott v. Richtmyer, 57 id. 49, 66; Beardslee v.

McElwee v. Ocean City

7 N.J. Tax 355 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 3, 1985

As this court observed in Fort Lee v. … See Farmingdale Realty Co. v.

Opinion No. 89-500 (1990) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1990

IN WHITE V. … SEE WASHINGTON V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 752 F.2D 1465 (9TH CIR. 1984) (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS INAPPLICABLE TO INDIAN COUNTRY); SANTA ROSA BAND OF INDIANS V.

Johnson, Dorothy v. Pilgrim's Pride, Inc., et al.

2016 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 27, 2016

See Bemis Co. v. Hones, 585 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tenn. 1979) (courts must consider motions by their substance rather than their title). In Furlough v. Spherion At/. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Dorothy J.

Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Koenigsberg

133 Misc. 2d 893 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 19, 1986

In Miranda, Brown and Koenigsberg DHPD counsel served the respondent with the second OSC in the courtroom or its vicinity; in Marceca the second OSC was served by a process server prior to the hearing. … Hess v Inman, 74 Hun 130 [3d Dept 1893]; Brett v Brown, 13 Abb [NS] 295; People v Aloi, 74 Misc 2d 263 [Nassau County Ct 1973]; Terlizzi v Brodie, 38 AD2d 762 [2d Dept 1972]; see, Thompson's Case, 122 Mass 428.)

Scott v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 28, 2009

Balkin v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3. … Wilson v.