Case law

Demotte, Julie v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

2018 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 13, 2018

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Julie Demotte ) Docket No. 2017-06-1778 ) v. … Prater v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 462 S.W.2d 514, 519 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970). See also Madu v. Madu, No. M1999-02302-COA-R3-CV, 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 708, at *16 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Hampton v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 3, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the … Dunbar v. City of Lumberton , 105 N.C. App. 701 , 414 S.E. 2d 387 (1992). 4.

Clancy v. State

126 Misc. 2d 292 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1984

Board of Higher Educ., 5 NY2d 430, 443-444 ). … State of New York, supra, p 449; Schaffer v Evans, 57 NY2d 992 ; Matter of Krumsiek v Regan, 91 AD2d 1134, 1135 ).

Clausen v. Ohio State Univ.

2010 Ohio 3932 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 21, 2010

[Cite as Clausen v. Ohio State Univ., 2010-Ohio-3932.] … Clausen is a classified civil service employee the State Personnel Board of Review is the proper jurisdiction for her claim.” See Berry v. Kent State Univ., Ct. of Cl. No. 2003-03388, 2004-Ohio-5915.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Ryan Walters, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

2024 OK AG 11 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 2024

Board of Commissioners of Okla. County v. Ryan , 1924 OK 1075, 232 P. 834; In re Thomas' Estate , 1943 OK 115, 136 P.2d 929; Herndon v. Anderson , 1933 OK 490, 25 P.2d 326. … OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Discussed 1924 OK 652, 228 P. 472, 102 Okla. 158, EDWARDS v. CHILDERS Discussed 1924 OK 1075, 232 P. 834, 107 Okla. 278, BOARD OF COM'RS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v.

Callahan, Michael v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2015 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 31, 2015

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a similar issue in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, supra. … In Crew v.

In re the Estate of Villalonga

6 Misc. 2d 587 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 11, 1957

It is well established that where two interpretations of the word “ children ” are possible the courts have been much disposed to adopt that one which will not serve to disinherit the heirs of the testator (Scott v. … Div. 285, 289 ; Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 ). By paragraph “ Sixth ” of the will testatrix divided the bulk of her jewelry equally between her two granddaughters, naming them.

In re the Estate of Hawley

32 Misc. 2d 624 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 5, 1961

Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494.) … Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494, supra).

In re the Will of Hemstreet

101 Misc. 340 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1917

color, subject to the visitation and inspection on such days as shall be fixed by the Board of Managers to all visitors and by an authorized representative of the State Board of Charities. … Corrigan v.

Williams v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 8, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988).

Bendix Corp. v. Taxation Div. Director

10 N.J. Tax 46 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 30, 1988

Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159 , 103 S.Ct. 2933 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983). … V.

In re the Estate of Blumenkrantz

14 Misc. 3d 462 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 22, 2006

It is within the jurisdiction of this court to determine whether the New York statute is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (see, Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., … Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513, 518 ; see, e.g., Bonham v. Coe, 276 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Straut, 126 N. Y. 201, 212 , *467 Brooklyn Free Kindergarten Soc. v. Elbran Realty Corp., 255 App. Div. 852 ; Robinson v.

Hayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management

2020 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 16, 2020

Runyon v. Runyon, No. W2013-02651-COA-T10B-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 184, at *20 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2014). … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010)).

Roman Catholic Bishop of Diocese of Baker v. Department of Revenue

9 Or. Tax 122 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 17, 1981

This rule was noted in Byers v. We-Wa-Ne, 86 Or 617, 631 , 169 P 121, 125 (1917). See also Wisconsin v. Hitchcock, 201 US 202 , 26 S Ct 498 , 50 L Ed 727 (1906); United States v. … Joseph Brown and placed in the hands of the county assessor, offered in evidence by defendant, contains a letter from an agent of the Pioneer Educational Society referring to a trust.

Williams, Cornelius v. People Ready, Inc.

2022 TN WC App. 22 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 2, 2022

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Wiesenfeld v. Director, Division of Taxation

3 N.J. Tax 3 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 26, 1981

The ball returns are made of plastic or metal and are affixed to the building by means of screws in 12"-wide boards. The boards, in turn, are “ram-shot” into the concrete flooring. … Y. v. City of N. Y., supra; San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. San Diego Cty., supra.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Walsh

25 N.J. Misc. 272 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 22, 1947

In State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad, 48 N. J. L. 146 (at p. 278); 4 Atl. … This theory was also followed by Chief Justice Beasley in his opinion delivered for the Supreme Court in the case of the Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N. J. L. 1 (at p. 5); 7 Atl.

Mays, April v. Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC

2021 TN WC 156 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 11, 2021

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Bailey, Marie v. Amazon

2022 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 3, 2022

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Marie P. … Blevins v. Pearson Hardwood Flooring Co., 144 S.W.2d 781, 783 (Tenn. 1940); see also Hughes v.

In re the Estate of Turner

36 Misc. 2d 684 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 10, 1962

Y. 283 ), statements of a testator made subsequent to the execution of a will do not constitute a proper basis for construing that instrument (Matter of Smith, supra; Dwight v. FanchEr, 245 N. Y. 71 ; Brown v.