Opinion

Mays, April v. Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC

  • 2021 TN WC 156
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Mar 11, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Pamela B. Johnson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

APRIL MAYS, ) Docket No. 2019-03-0262

Employee, )

V. )

FAST PACE MEDICAL CLINIC, )

PLLC, ) State File No. 15377-2019

Employer, )

And )

VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, ) Judge Pamela B. Johnson

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Decision on the Record

April Mays fell at work, and Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC provided authorized

treatment for her neck and cervical spine. Ms. Mays now seeks additional treatment for her

lumbar and thoracic spine, which Fast Pace denied. After a review of the record, the Court

holds Ms. Mays is entitled to the additional treatment.

History of Claim

As a child, Ms. Mays had a rod placed in her spine due to scoliosis. On February

12, 2019, she tripped over a cinder block while carrying boxes at work and fell to the

ground. She landed on her right side and experienced immediate pain in her neck and upper

back.

She initially treated in-house at Fast Pace. The provider recommended cervical and

thoracic MRIs and referred Ms. Mays to an orthopedic surgeon for evaluation of neck pain

and upper-back pain with numbness and tingling into the right hand.

Ms. Mays selected orthopedist Dr. Paul Johnson from the panel. During her initial

visits, she reported moderate to severe neck pain radiating into her upper extremities, pain

1

in her cervicothoracic junction radiating into her head, and lumbar pain. Dr. Johnson

treated her conservatively. When her symptoms did not improve, he ordered a cervical

MRI, which revealed disc herniations at C5-6 on the left and at C6-7 on the right. Dr.

Johnson performed a cervical fusion at C5-6 and C6-7. After surgery, he ordered physical

therapy for intermittent, moderate neck pain.

Six months later, Ms. Mays still complained of neck pain. When Dr. Johnson

discussed returning to work, Ms. Mays believed she could not do so, given her chronic

lumbar, thoracic, and cervical pain. Dr. Johnson stated that the thoracic and lower-back

pain had very little, if anything, to do with the job-related injury.

In June 2020, Ms. Mays reported intermittent, moderate symptoms in her neck and

low back. Dr. Johnson placed her at maximum medical improvement, assigned a six-

percent permanent impairment, and released her to return to work with permanent

restrictions.

Ms. Mays then obtained an independent medical examination with Dr. C.M.

Salekin. He diagnosed: (1) cervical radiculopathies from C5 through C7 treated surgically

with residual symptoms; (2) right lumbosacral radiculopathy at L5/S1 caused by the fall at

work; and (3) probable rod displacement versus thoracic disc protrusion caused by the fall.

Dr. Salekin recommended lumbar and thoracic spine MRIs and an orthopedic evaluation

of the rod position.

In his C-32, Dr. Salekin noted that the fall at work more likely than not primarily

caused the need for treatment. He also noted that the injury aggravated a pre-existing

condition, stating, “pain over Harrington Rod area on the thoracic spine which may be

misplaced.” He further wrote that the fall was primarily responsible for advancing or

worsening Ms. Mays’s pre-existing condition and need for treatment.

In January 2021, Dr. Johnson responded to a causation letter from Fast Pace by

stating that the alleged thoracic and lumbar injuries were not causally related to the work

injury.

Ms. Mays requested treatment for her thoracic and lumbar spine as recommended

by Dr. Salekin.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an Expedited Hearing, Ms. Mays must show that she is likely to prevail at a

hearing on the merits that she is entitled to the requested treatment. See Tenn. Code Ann.

§ 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp.

App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

The Workers’ Compensation Law requires an employer to furnish medical

treatment made reasonably necessary by a work injury. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

204(a)(1)(A). A work injury causes the need for medical treatment only if it is shown to a

reasonable degree of medical certainty that the injury contributed more than fifty percent

in causing the need for medical treatment. “Shown to a reasonable degree of medical

certainty” means that, in the opinion of the physician, it is more likely than not considering

all causes. The causation opinion of the panel-selected physician is presumed correct. See

generally Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14).

Here, Ms. Mays selected Dr. Johnson from a panel. Therefore, the Court must

presume his causation opinions are correct. To overcome this presumption, Ms. Mays must

present evidence rebutting his opinion by a preponderance of the evidence. Tenn. Code

Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(E).

When comparing the medical records, the Court notes that the Fast Pace provider

referred Ms. Mays to an orthopedic surgeon for neck and upper-back pain and

recommended cervical and thoracic MRIs. Further, in her initial visits with Dr. Johnson,

Ms. Mays reported moderate to severe neck pain radiating into her upper extremities, pain

in her cervicothoracic junction radiating into her head, and lumbar pain. However, Dr.

Johnson stated, without explanation, that the thoracic and lower-back pain had very little,

if anything, to do with the work injury. He confirmed this opinion in response to Fast Pace’s

causation letter.

In contrast, Dr. Salekin diagnosed cervical radiculopathies from C5-C7 surgically

repaired, lumbosacral radiculopathy at L5/S1, and probable rod displacement versus

thoracic disc protrusion. He related all these problems to Ms. Mays’s work-related fall. He

recommended further orthopedic evaluation of the rod placement and lumbar and thoracic

MRIs.

In his C-32, Dr. Salekin wrote that the fall at work more likely than not primarily

caused the need for treatment. He also believed that the injury aggravated a pre-existing

condition, noting, “pain over Harrington Rod area on the thoracic spine which may be

misplaced.” He additionally stated the fall was primarily responsible for advancing or

making worse the pre-existing condition and need for treatment.

Considering the record as a whole and weighing the conflicting expert opinions, the

Court holds Ms. Mays presented sufficient proof to rebut Dr. Johnson’s causation opinion.

Ms. Mays’s initial treatment at Fast Pace documented her complaints of thoracic spine and

low back complaints. The Fast Pace provider referred her to an orthopedic surgeon and

recommended a thoracic MRI immediately after the injury. When she saw Dr. Johnson,

Ms. Mays continued to complain of symptoms in her thoracic and lumbar spine, but Dr.

Johnson’s treatment focused only on her cervical spine. When she continued to complain

of thoracic and lumbar spine back, Dr. Johnson concluded the symptoms were unrelated to

3

the work injury without explanation. He confirmed his conclusion in a causation letter by

checking a box. However, Fast Pace did not offer his deposition or C-32 to provide the

Court with a detailed explanation as to how he reached his conclusion, despite noting her

thoracic and lumbar spine complaints in his first few visits with Ms. Mays.

In contrast, Ms. Mays offered Dr. Salekin’s opinion who noted the lumbar and

thoracic complaints and provided causation opinions that the fall aggravated her pre-

existing thoracic spine condition. He detailed the mechanism of injury and his causation

opinion in his C-32 and accompanying report.

Accordingly, the Court holds Ms. Mays has shown she is likely to prevail at a

hearing on the merits that she is entitled to the recommended treatment to include lumbar

and thoracic MRIs and orthopedic evaluation of the thoracic spine.

Dr. Johnson remains the authorized treating physician. However, if he will not agree

to evaluate and treat Ms. Mays’s thoracic and lumbar spine complaints, Fast Pace shall

provide a panel from which she may select an orthopedic physician to do so.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. May’s claim against Fast Pace for the requested benefits is granted at this time.

2. This case is set for a Status Conference on July 12, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern

Time. The parties must call (855) 543-5041 (toll-free) to participate. Failure to

appear might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED March 11, 2021.

Pamele E. hunter

JUDGE PAMELA B/ JOHNSON

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

The Court reviewed the entire case file in reaching its decision. Specifically, the

Court reviewed the following documents:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination with attachments, April 4, 2019

2. Petition for Benefit Determination with attachments, October 1, 2020

3. Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing with attachments

Employer’s Notice of Filing of Medical Records

Employer’s Expedited Hearing Brief

Expedited Hearing Docketing Notice — Decision on the Record

MANUF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as indicated on March 11, 2021.

Name Certified Email Service sent to:

Mail

Ameesh A. Kherani, xX akherani @kheranilaw.com

Employee’s Attorney

J. Brent Moore, xX bmoore @ortalekelley.com

Employer’s Attorney

hain

PENNY SHRUM% Court Clerk

WC.CourtClerk @ tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. Ifa transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.pov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

we.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.:

State File No.:

Date of Injury:

Employee

Employer

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

0 Expedited Hearing Order filed on O Motion Order filed on

C1 Compensation Order filed on 1 Other Order filed on

issued by Judge

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): [: Employer[_ Employee

Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney’s Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: Docket No.: Date of Inj.:

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): [2 Employer [_|Employee

Appellee’s Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney's Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:

3. Telephone Number:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

6. lam employed by:

2. Address:

4. Date of Birth:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

My employer's address is:

My employer’s phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $

SSI $

Retirement $

Disability $

Unemployment $

Worker's Comp.$

Other $

LB-1108 (REV 11/15)

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: }

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.