Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.21s

  • Sauber, Sarah v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.

    2020 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 13, 2020

    McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2008)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 12, 2008

    Helm v. Childers , 75 P.2d 398 , 399 (1938). "Such a determination should be reversed only upon a clear showing that it was manifestly arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable." State ex rel. Brown v. … See, e.g. , Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers , 171 P.2d 600 , 603 (Okla. 1946). In Sharp v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1989

    In Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Finance, 48 N.E.2d 514 , 517 (Ill. 1943), the Illinois Supreme Court interpreted an Illinois statute which taxed certain sales of property. … Baum v. Oklahoma City, 126 P.2d 249 , 251 (Okla. 1942), and Board of Trustees of F. and P. Fund v. Templeton, 86 P.2d 1000 , 1003-1004 (Okla. 1939).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1998

    LeForce v. Bullard, 454 P.2d 297 (Okla. 1969). … If the taxpayer wishes to appeal the assessor's determination, the taxpayer may file an appeal with the county board of equalization. ¶ 12 For those taxpayers having property assessed by the State Board of Equalization, the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arlene Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc.

    2022 TN WC App. 42 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 15, 2022

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hosford, Jane / Red Rover Preschool

    2014 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 2, 2014

    Jones v. Sterling Last Corp., 962 S.W.2d 469, 471 (Tenn. 1998). … Bogus v. Manpower Temp. Serv., 823 S.W.2d 544, 546 (Tenn. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1988

    THIS SET OF LAWS AUTHORIZED THE CREATION OF LOCAL DRAINAGE DISTRICTS BY THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE STATE, WITH THE FUNDING OF THESE DISTRICTS TO COME PRIMARILY FROM ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AGAINST LOCAL … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY V. WXC CO., 473 P.2D 231 (OKLA. APP. 1970); ACCORD DE LOZIER V. COLLIER, 230 P.2D 240 (OKLA. 1924).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Callahan, Michael v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    2015 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 31, 2015

    The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a similar issue in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, supra. … In Crew v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • WCI-Westinghouse, Inc. v. Edison Township

    7 N.J. Tax 610 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 1, 1985

    Sunshine Biscuits, Inc. v. Sayreville, 4 N.J.Tax 486, 495 (Tax Ct.1982); Dworman v. … SimiIarIy, in CPC Int'l v.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Truedell-Bell v. Marion County Treasurer

    955 N.E.2d 872 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 31, 2011

    See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Ispat Inland, Inc., 784 N.E.2d 477, 482 (Ind.2003). … State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Montgomery, 730 N.E.2d 680, 686 (Ind.2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wheat v. Ward County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2

    279 S.W. 1116 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 10, 1926

    This land was not rendered for taxes for the year 1920, but was appraised and assessed by the board of equalization of the district. … In assessing the real property in. the district, the board gave no consideration to the value of improvements and location of the land. The 'question here presented is the same as that in the ease of J. W. Ogburn v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Revnew, Deborah v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    2016 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 3, 2016

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Deborah Revnew ) Docket No. 2016-06-0320 ) v. … Norton v. McCaskill, 12 S.W.3d 789, 795 (Tenn. 2000) (Issues raised for the first time on appeal will usually be deemed waived.); Lawrence v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-183 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971

    In Atlas Life Insurance Co. v. … Bd of Educ., 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 (1921), the legal question involved was whether or not a certain lease for 99 years, executed by the Board of Education of the City of Tulsa to a private party, was valid and proper.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Hawley

    32 Misc. 2d 624 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 5, 1961

    Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494.) … Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494, supra).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management

    2020 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 16, 2020

    Runyon v. Runyon, No. W2013-02651-COA-T10B-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 184, at *20 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2014). … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 8, 2009

    . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Global Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLC

    2017 NCBC 106 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 21, 2017

    Tack is a member of GTA’s Board of Directors. 2. … Timothy remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about September 22, 2016, and Steven remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about August 11, 2017. 18.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Blumenkrantz

    14 Misc. 3d 462 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 22, 2006

    It is within the jurisdiction of this court to determine whether the New York statute is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (see, Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., … Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513, 518 ; see, e.g., Bonham v. Coe, 276 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Straut, 126 N. Y. 201, 212 , *467 Brooklyn Free Kindergarten Soc. v. Elbran Realty Corp., 255 App. Div. 852 ; Robinson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-207 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1977

    The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you, in effect, ask the following question: "Can the Board of Directors of the Grand River Dam Authority consider a modification of a bid, after the … The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Carpet City, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola

    283 S.W. 777 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 26, 1926

    As was said by the court in the case of Calhoun v. G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co., 84 Tex. 226 , 19 S. … Co. v. Lee, 70 Tex. 501 , 7 S. W. 857 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, 46 Tex. 356 , 26 Am. Rep. 272 . We recommend that both judgments be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court. OURETON, C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.