Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Sauber, Sarah v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
2020 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 13, 2020
McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 12, 2008
Helm v. Childers , 75 P.2d 398 , 399 (1938). "Such a determination should be reversed only upon a clear showing that it was manifestly arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable." State ex rel. Brown v. … See, e.g. , Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers , 171 P.2d 600 , 603 (Okla. 1946). In Sharp v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1989
In Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Finance, 48 N.E.2d 514 , 517 (Ill. 1943), the Illinois Supreme Court interpreted an Illinois statute which taxed certain sales of property. … Baum v. Oklahoma City, 126 P.2d 249 , 251 (Okla. 1942), and Board of Trustees of F. and P. Fund v. Templeton, 86 P.2d 1000 , 1003-1004 (Okla. 1939).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1998
LeForce v. Bullard, 454 P.2d 297 (Okla. 1969). … If the taxpayer wishes to appeal the assessor's determination, the taxpayer may file an appeal with the county board of equalization. ¶ 12 For those taxpayers having property assessed by the State Board of Equalization, the
Cited 0 timesPublishedArlene Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc.
2022 TN WC App. 42 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 15, 2022
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHosford, Jane / Red Rover Preschool
2014 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 2, 2014
Jones v. Sterling Last Corp., 962 S.W.2d 469, 471 (Tenn. 1998). … Bogus v. Manpower Temp. Serv., 823 S.W.2d 544, 546 (Tenn. 1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1988
THIS SET OF LAWS AUTHORIZED THE CREATION OF LOCAL DRAINAGE DISTRICTS BY THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE STATE, WITH THE FUNDING OF THESE DISTRICTS TO COME PRIMARILY FROM ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AGAINST LOCAL … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY V. WXC CO., 473 P.2D 231 (OKLA. APP. 1970); ACCORD DE LOZIER V. COLLIER, 230 P.2D 240 (OKLA. 1924).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCallahan, Michael v. Amazon.com, Inc.
2015 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 31, 2015
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a similar issue in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, supra. … In Crew v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWCI-Westinghouse, Inc. v. Edison Township
7 N.J. Tax 610 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 1, 1985
Sunshine Biscuits, Inc. v. Sayreville, 4 N.J.Tax 486, 495 (Tax Ct.1982); Dworman v. … SimiIarIy, in CPC Int'l v.
Cited 78 timesPublishedTruedell-Bell v. Marion County Treasurer
955 N.E.2d 872 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 31, 2011
See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Ispat Inland, Inc., 784 N.E.2d 477, 482 (Ind.2003). … State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. Montgomery, 730 N.E.2d 680, 686 (Ind.2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWheat v. Ward County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2
279 S.W. 1116 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 10, 1926
This land was not rendered for taxes for the year 1920, but was appraised and assessed by the board of equalization of the district. … In assessing the real property in. the district, the board gave no consideration to the value of improvements and location of the land. The 'question here presented is the same as that in the ease of J. W. Ogburn v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRevnew, Deborah v. Amazon.com, Inc.
2016 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 3, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Deborah Revnew ) Docket No. 2016-06-0320 ) v. … Norton v. McCaskill, 12 S.W.3d 789, 795 (Tenn. 2000) (Issues raised for the first time on appeal will usually be deemed waived.); Lawrence v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971
In Atlas Life Insurance Co. v. … Bd of Educ., 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 (1921), the legal question involved was whether or not a certain lease for 99 years, executed by the Board of Education of the City of Tulsa to a private party, was valid and proper.
Cited 0 timesPublished32 Misc. 2d 624 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 5, 1961
Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494.) … Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494, supra).
Cited 7 timesPublishedHayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management
2020 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 16, 2020
Runyon v. Runyon, No. W2013-02651-COA-T10B-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 184, at *20 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2014). … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliams v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 8, 2009
. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlobal Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLC
2017 NCBC 106 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 21, 2017
Tack is a member of GTA’s Board of Directors. 2. … Timothy remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about September 22, 2016, and Steven remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about August 11, 2017. 18.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Estate of Blumenkrantz
14 Misc. 3d 462 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 22, 2006
It is within the jurisdiction of this court to determine whether the New York statute is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (see, Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., … Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513, 518 ; see, e.g., Bonham v. Coe, 276 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Straut, 126 N. Y. 201, 212 , *467 Brooklyn Free Kindergarten Soc. v. Elbran Realty Corp., 255 App. Div. 852 ; Robinson v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1977
The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you, in effect, ask the following question: "Can the Board of Directors of the Grand River Dam Authority consider a modification of a bid, after the … The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Carpet City, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGalveston Electric Co. v. Marangola
283 S.W. 777 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 26, 1926
As was said by the court in the case of Calhoun v. G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co., 84 Tex. 226 , 19 S. … Co. v. Lee, 70 Tex. 501 , 7 S. W. 857 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, 46 Tex. 356 , 26 Am. Rep. 272 . We recommend that both judgments be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court. OURETON, C.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna