Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.50s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1979
See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself."
Cited 0 timesPublishedHeaden v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 14, 2011
. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 5.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVivier v. Lumbermen's Indemnity Exch.
250 S.W. 417 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 25, 1923
The trial court rendered judgment sustaining the Accident Board’s award. … See, also, the English cases of Board of Management of Trim Joint District School v. Kelly, (1914) App. Cas. 667; Nisbet v. Rayne & Burn (1910) 2 K. B. 689; Dennis v. White & Co., (1917) App. Cas. 479.
Cited 29 timesPublishedGoolsby v. Yadkin Valley Motor Co.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 11, 2007
The following year he began work with Rockefeller University in New York for three years while studying for the medical boards. In 1991, he passed the medical boards and passed the clinical boards in 1992. … Perkins v. U.S. Airways , ___ N.C. App. ___, 628 S.E.2d 402 (2006).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrockman-El v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 29, 2011
Pursuant to the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see Stone v. N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSauber, Robert v. Charter Communications, LLC aka Charter Spectrum
2022 TN WC 62 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 28, 2022
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Estate of Schlossman
136 Misc. 893 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 5, 1930
(Kings County Trust Co. v. Hyams, 242 N. Y. 405, 412 ; Nay v. Curley, 113 id. 575, 578; Clark v. Dada, 183 App. Div. 253, 263 ; Cole v. Sweet, 187 N. Y. 488 ; Merritt v. Campbell, 79 id. 625 .) … (Matter of Brown, 252 N. Y. 366 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedVerdugo v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 31, 2010
Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … See Stone v. N.C. Dep't of Labor , 347 N.C. 473 , 479 , 495 S.E.2d 711 , 714-15 (1998). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublished179 Misc. 681 · New York Family Court · Sep 16, 1942
shall be con *687 ducted in accordance with such rules as the Board of Justices may adopt. … Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins, 284 N. Y. 129, 134 .) For, the existing Rules of Practice of the Family Court Division as last adopted by the Board of Justices make no mention of evidence by deposition.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1979
See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Bruce, 51 Okla. 541 152 P. 125 (1915). As such, they possess only that authority which is conferred upon them by statute. … See Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City, Okla. 484 P.2d 882 (1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Miami Christian School, Inc.
15 Fla. Supp. 2d 171 · Dade County Property Appraisal Adjustment Board · Mar 31, 1985
Thus, in Lummus v. … The undersigned is mindful of the general principle that determinations made by the Property Appraiser come to the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board with the presumption of correctness. Markham v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNorwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Smith
12 S.W.2d 558 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929
Ass’n v. Downing (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 112 , and in Millers’ Ind. Underwriters v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. … Co. v. Harp (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 502 , and Western Ind. Co. v. Corder (Tex. Civ. App.) 249 S. W. 316 .
Cited 27 timesPublishedHarris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
2022 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 9, 2022
Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903-04 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation & Development
131 Misc. 2d 505 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 24, 1986
The situation is far different from that in Long v Kissling Real Estate ( 80 Misc 2d 817 [Rockland County Ct 1975]) relied upon by the owner. … The Loft Board has been developing expertise and a special staff; the courts give great deference to its decisions. (See, e.g., Korn v Gleich, NYLJ, Feb. 17, 1984, p 6, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept].)
Cited 0 timesPublishedDemotte, Julie v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
2018 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 13, 2018
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Julie Demotte ) Docket No. 2017-06-1778 ) v. … Prater v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 462 S.W.2d 514, 519 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970). See also Madu v. Madu, No. M1999-02302-COA-R3-CV, 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 708, at *16 (Tenn. Ct. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarrett, Buster v. Lithko Contracting, Inc.
2016 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 17, 2016
Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. … See Carter v. First Source Furniture Grp., 92 S.W.3d 367, 368 (Tenn. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublished135 N.Y.S. 511 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1912
This same rule of law is recognized in O’Brien v. Jackson, 167 N. Y. 31 , 60 N. E. 238 . It is therefore apparent that, if the claimant has a claim for board and care of John S. … In Skidmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBendix Corp. v. Taxation Div. Director
10 N.J. Tax 46 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 30, 1988
Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159 , 103 S.Ct. 2933 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983). … V.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1970
(Emphasis added) In Board of Trustees of Fireman's R. P. Fund v. … Steck v. Prentice (Colo.) 95 P. 552 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 P. 1000 ; Chesapeake O. Ry. Co. v. Pack, 6 W. Va. 397 , 403 ; Satcher v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDepartment of Revenue v. Froman
14 Or. Tax 543 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 8, 1999
Taxpayers were told that if they were appealing value, then they needed to appeal to the board of property tax appeals. … The basic rule, as *549 expressed in Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. Fredrick, 271 Mich. 538, 544-45, 260 NW 908, 909 (1935), and quoted by the court in Wood v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna