Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

2.50s

  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1979

    See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Headen v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 14, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vivier v. Lumbermen's Indemnity Exch.

    250 S.W. 417 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 25, 1923

    The trial court rendered judgment sustaining the Accident Board’s award. … See, also, the English cases of Board of Management of Trim Joint District School v. Kelly, (1914) App. Cas. 667; Nisbet v. Rayne & Burn (1910) 2 K. B. 689; Dennis v. White & Co., (1917) App. Cas. 479.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Goolsby v. Yadkin Valley Motor Co.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 11, 2007

    The following year he began work with Rockefeller University in New York for three years while studying for the medical boards. In 1991, he passed the medical boards and passed the clinical boards in 1992. … Perkins v. U.S. Airways , ___ N.C. App. ___, 628 S.E.2d 402 (2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brockman-El v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 29, 2011

    Pursuant to the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see Stone v. N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sauber, Robert v. Charter Communications, LLC aka Charter Spectrum

    2022 TN WC 62 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 28, 2022

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Schlossman

    136 Misc. 893 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 5, 1930

    (Kings County Trust Co. v. Hyams, 242 N. Y. 405, 412 ; Nay v. Curley, 113 id. 575, 578; Clark v. Dada, 183 App. Div. 253, 263 ; Cole v. Sweet, 187 N. Y. 488 ; Merritt v. Campbell, 79 id. 625 .) … (Matter of Brown, 252 N. Y. 366 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Verdugo v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 31, 2010

    Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … See Stone v. N.C. Dep't of Labor , 347 N.C. 473 , 479 , 495 S.E.2d 711 , 714-15 (1998). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Denton v. Denton

    179 Misc. 681 · New York Family Court · Sep 16, 1942

    shall be con *687 ducted in accordance with such rules as the Board of Justices may adopt. … Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins, 284 N. Y. 129, 134 .) For, the existing Rules of Practice of the Family Court Division as last adopted by the Board of Justices make no mention of evidence by deposition.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1979

    See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Bruce, 51 Okla. 541 152 P. 125 (1915). As such, they possess only that authority which is conferred upon them by statute. … See Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City, Okla. 484 P.2d 882 (1971).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Miami Christian School, Inc.

    15 Fla. Supp. 2d 171 · Dade County Property Appraisal Adjustment Board · Mar 31, 1985

    Thus, in Lummus v. … The undersigned is mindful of the general principle that determinations made by the Property Appraiser come to the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board with the presumption of correctness. Markham v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Smith

    12 S.W.2d 558 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

    Ass’n v. Downing (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 112 , and in Millers’ Ind. Underwriters v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. … Co. v. Harp (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 502 , and Western Ind. Co. v. Corder (Tex. Civ. App.) 249 S. W. 316 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Harris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    2022 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 9, 2022

    Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903-04 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation & Development

    131 Misc. 2d 505 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 24, 1986

    The situation is far different from that in Long v Kissling Real Estate ( 80 Misc 2d 817 [Rockland County Ct 1975]) relied upon by the owner. … The Loft Board has been developing expertise and a special staff; the courts give great deference to its decisions. (See, e.g., Korn v Gleich, NYLJ, Feb. 17, 1984, p 6, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Demotte, Julie v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    2018 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 13, 2018

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Julie Demotte ) Docket No. 2017-06-1778 ) v. … Prater v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 462 S.W.2d 514, 519 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970). See also Madu v. Madu, No. M1999-02302-COA-R3-CV, 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 708, at *16 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barrett, Buster v. Lithko Contracting, Inc.

    2016 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 17, 2016

    Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. … See Carter v. First Source Furniture Grp., 92 S.W.3d 367, 368 (Tenn. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Alden's Will

    135 N.Y.S. 511 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1912

    This same rule of law is recognized in O’Brien v. Jackson, 167 N. Y. 31 , 60 N. E. 238 . It is therefore apparent that, if the claimant has a claim for board and care of John S. … In Skidmore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bendix Corp. v. Taxation Div. Director

    10 N.J. Tax 46 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 30, 1988

    Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159 , 103 S.Ct. 2933 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983). … V.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-119 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1970

    (Emphasis added) In Board of Trustees of Fireman's R. P. Fund v. … Steck v. Prentice (Colo.) 95 P. 552 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 P. 1000 ; Chesapeake O. Ry. Co. v. Pack, 6 W. Va. 397 , 403 ; Satcher v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Department of Revenue v. Froman

    14 Or. Tax 543 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 8, 1999

    Taxpayers were told that if they were appealing value, then they needed to appeal to the board of property tax appeals. … The basic rule, as *549 expressed in Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. Fredrick, 271 Mich. 538, 544-45, 260 NW 908, 909 (1935), and quoted by the court in Wood v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.