Opinion

Sauber, Robert v. Charter Communications, LLC aka Charter Spectrum

  • 2022 TN WC 62
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Jul 28, 2022
Status
Published
On the bench
Pamela B. Johnson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Jul 28, 2022

03:43 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

ROBERT SAUBER, ) Docket No. 2022-03-0480

Employee, )

V. )

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, )

LLC aka CHARTER SPECTRUM, ) State File No. 22808-2022

Employer, )

And )

NATIONAL UNION FIRE )

INSURANCE COMPANY OF )

PITTSBURG, PA, )

Carrier. )

Judge Pamela B. Johnson

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on July 12, 2022, to determine whether Robert

Sauber is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits after a fall at work. Charter

argued that the fall was idiopathic, even though the mediator did not certify the issue of

compensability. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Mr. Sauber showed he is likely

to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Therefore, the Court grants his request for benefits.

History of Claim

On March 2, 2022, Mr. Sauber turned to clock out and fell.! He reached out with

his right hand to break his fall and broke his wrist. He reported his injury the same day,

and Charter first sent him to an urgent care facility. Later, Charter told him to go to an

emergency room. The emergency providers reset and splinted his wrist and referred him to

orthopedic surgeon Dr. Brandon Asbury.

' Mr. Sauber testified that he did not know why he fell that day. He stumbled a few times that day, which

his supervisor observed, and he told his supervisor that his Achilles heel was hurting. He also testified that

his company-provided boots were worn, and the company did not replace them the year before due to supply

shortages. On cross-examination, Mr. Sauber stated the concrete surface was smooth with a slight incline

but denied any other visible hazard.

Dr. Asbury saw Mr. Sauber on March 3 and determined, “With greater than 50%

certainty, this is a work-related injury due to the patient’s fall while on the job.” Dr. Asbury

assigned “non-weightbearing” restrictions on that date and placed Mr. Sauber completely

off work on March 7. Dr. Asbury surgically repaired the wrist on March 11. At his March

23 appointment, Dr. Asbury assigned light-duty restrictions and ordered occupational

therapy. On April 28, Dr. Asbury continued the light-duty restrictions and again ordered

therapy.

During the hearing, Mr. Sauber testified that, after speaking with the adjuster after

the work incident, he understood that Charter’s carrier had accepted his claim and would

pay his medical and temporary disability benefits. However, Charter has not paid any

benefits. He also testified that Charter’s carrier never provided him a panel of physicians

nor authorized the recommended therapy.

Mr. Sauber testified that he sent the March and April therapy referrals to the adjuster

and left several messages with the adjuster, who never responded. Mr. Sauber testified,

“Charter is a great company, but I was ghosted by [the adjuster].”

Mr. Sauber testified that he has not worked since the fall. He said human resources

checked on light-duty work, but none was available. He agreed to an average weekly wage

of $1,156.57 and a compensation rate of $771.06 per week.

Mr. Sauber filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on April 28 seeking medical

and disability benefits. Charter did not respond to the petition or participate in mediation.’

Likewise, Charter did not participate in completing the Dispute Certification Notice. The

Dispute Certification Notice listed medical and temporary disability benefits as the

disputed issues and did not include compensability. Under defenses, the notice included:

“The carrier has refused to respond to the employee’s Petition for Benefit Determination.”

At the Expedited Hearing, Charter acknowledged compensability was not an issue

listed on the Dispute Certification Notice but asserted Mr. Sauber suffered an idiopathic

fall and was therefore not entitled to the requested benefits.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Sauber must show that he is likely to prevail at a

hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage

Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Subject to narrow exceptions, “only issues that have been certified by a workers’

? Charter did not hire counsel until two days before the Expedited Hearing.

2

compensation mediator within a dispute certification notice may be presented to the court

for adjudication.” Phillips v. Carolina Const. Solutions, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 10, at *18-19 (Feb. 26, 2016); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(b)(1). To determine

which issues the mediator certified in the Dispute Certification Notice, the trial court must

“consider the document as a whole without reading its components in a vacuum.” Marzette

v. Pat Salmon and Sons, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *11 (Sept. 18,

2015).

The parties may only present for adjudication issues listed on the Dispute

Certification Notice. The only exception is when the trial court makes express findings that

the parties did not have knowledge of the issue before the issuance of the Dispute

Certification Notice, and the parties could not have known of the issue despite reasonable

investigation; and that prohibiting presentation of the issue would result in substantial

injustice to the petitioning party. Dorsey v. Amazon.com, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 13, at *8-9 (May 14, 2015); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(b)(1)-(2).

Here, the mediator certified issues of medical and temporary disability benefits.

Under defenses, the mediator noted, “The carrier has refused to respond to the employee’s

Petition for Benefit Determination.” When Charter failed to respond to Mr. Sauber’s

petition, participate in mediation, and assist in the completion of the Dispute Certification

Notice, it did so to its own detriment. The Court finds that Charter’s idiopathic defense

invokes the issue of compensability, which is not certified for adjudication. Thus, Charter

cannot rely on this defense at this Expedited Hearing.

In support of its holding, the Court finds that Charter did not show that, at the time

the mediator issued the Dispute Certification Notice, it did not have knowledge of the

idiopathic fall defense and could not have known of the defense despite reasonable

investigation. The March 3 medical reports from the emergency department and Dr.

Asbury’s office noted that Mr. Sauber “turned and lost his balance and landed on his right

wrist” and “he tripped over himself and fell.” Charter cannot claim it did not know or could

not have known despite reasonable investigation the circumstances surrounding Mr.

Sauber’s fall before the mediator issued the Dispute Certification Notice on June 9. Thus,

Charter gave no viable reason upon which the Court can consider its idiopathic fall defense

where, as here, the mediator did not certify compensability as an issue for adjudication.

Moreover, allowing Charter to present the issue and defense at the Expedited

Hearing would result in substantial injustice to Mr. Sauber. He testified that he first learned

the day before the hearing that Charter was denying his injury was work-related. Mr.

Sauber testified that, up to that point, he understood that Charter’s carrier had accepted his

claim.

Excluding the issue of compensability and an idiopathic fall defense, the record

established that, at a hearing on the merits, Mr. Sauber will likely prevail in showing that

3

he fell at work and broke his wrist. He gave immediate notice to his supervisor, who

instructed him to seek medical care at the emergency room. The emergency room provider

referred him to Dr. Asbury, who surgically repaired his broken wrist. Charter did not

provide him a panel of physicians.

The Workers’ Compensation Law requires an employer, upon receiving notice of

an injury, to furnish all medical and surgical treatment made reasonably necessary by the

work accident. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). Therefore, Charter shall pay all

medical expenses made necessary by Mr. Sauber’s March 2 fall.

Further, the Law requires the employer to provide the injured employee with a panel

of three doctors from which the employee may choose a treating physician. Tenn. Code

Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)G). When an employer fails to provide a panel, it does so at the

risk that, if the claim is later deemed compensable, it may be required to pay for medical

care with the physician of the employee’s choosing. Ducros v. Metro Roofing & Metal

Supply Co., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 62, at *10 (Oct. 17, 2017).

Here, Charter did not provide Mr. Sauber a panel. Thus, Dr. Asbury shall remain

the authorized treating physician. Further, Charter shall authorize and pay for the therapy

recommended by Dr. Asbury and provide ongoing treatment made reasonably necessary

by the March 2 work accident.

Turning to temporary disability benefits, an injured employee is entitled to

temporary total disability benefits when he becomes disabled due to a compensable injury;

a causal connection exists between the injury and the inability to work; and the period of

disability is established. An injured employee is entitled to temporary partial disability

when the treating physician returns him to work with restrictions that the employer either

could not or would not accommodate. Jones v. Crencor Leasing & Sales, 2015 TN Wrk.

Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7, 8 (Dec. 11, 2015).

In this case, Dr. Asbury both assigned restrictions and took Mr. Sauber completely

off work due to his work injury. On March 3, Dr. Asbury assigned restrictions and, on

March 7, took Mr. Sauber off work. By March 23, Dr. Asbury returned Mr. Sauber to work

with restrictions, which he continued on April 28. Mr. Sauber has not worked since the

March 2 fall because light-duty work was unavailable. Therefore, Mr. Sauber is entitled to

$771.06 per week from March 3 to the present and continuing as long as his temporary

disability exists.

Additionally, the Court refers Charter’s carrier to the Compliance Program for

investigation and assessment of a civil penalty under Tennessee Code Annotated section

50-6-118. The Court finds that Charter failed to respond to the petition, failed to participate

in mediation, failed to assist in the completion of the dispute certification notice, failed to

provide a panel of physicians, and failed to file a wage statement. Upon its issuance, a copy

4

of this Order will be sent to the Compliance Program.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Charter shall provide medical care for Mr. Sauber’s injuries as required by

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204 (2021). Dr. Asbury shall remain the

authorized treating physician.

2. Charter shall pay all previous medical expenses made necessary by Mr. Sauber’s

March 2 fall.

3. Charter shall authorize and pay for the recommended therapy and provide ongoing

treatment made reasonably necessary by the March 2 work accident.

4. Charter shall pay Mr. Sauber $771.06 per week from March 3, 2022, to the present,

or 27 weeks, for a lump sum payment of $16,192.26.

5. Charter shall continue paying temporary disability benefits as long as the temporary

disability exists.

6. The Court refers Charter’s carrier to the Compliance Program for investigation and

assessment of a civil penalty under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-118.

7. The Court sets a Status Conference on November 14, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern

Time. The parties must dial 855-543-5041 (toll-free) to participate.

8. Unless interlocutory appeal of this Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur by seven business days of entry of this Order as required

by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3) (2021). The Insurer or Self-

Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance by email to

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov by the compliance deadline. Failure to do so may

result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For compliance questions, please

contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit at

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

“kewl ll Pl WwW

JUDGE PAMELA B. JOHNSON

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

ENTERED July 28, 2022.

APPENDIX

Technical Record:

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Hearing

Docketing Notice

Notice of Appearance

a= Hf

Exhibits:

Rule 72 Declaration of Robert Sauber

Pay Stubs

Medical Records and Expenses of Blount Memorial Hospital

Medical Expense of LeConte Radiology

Medical Records of OrthoTennessee

ARwWNS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as shown on July 28, 2022.

Name Mail Email | Service sent to:

Robert Sauber, XxX glmadmin@gmail.com

Self-Represented

Employee

John W. Barringer, Jr., x jbarringer@manierherod.com

Employer’s Attorney

Compliance Program x wecompliance.program@tn.gov

ALMA > Sf... oP puss Ld >>

Le SHRUM, Court Clerk

WC.CourfClerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the

date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must

serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. Ifa transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.pov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

we.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.:

State File No.:

Date of Injury:

Employee

Employer

Notice is given that

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

0 Expedited Hearing Order filed on O Motion Order filed on

C1 Compensation Order filed on 1 Other Order filed on

issued by Judge

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): [: Employer[_ Employee

Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney’s Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: Docket No.: Date of Inj.:

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): [2 Employer [_|Employee

Appellee’s Address: Phone:

Email:

Attorney’s Name: BPR#:

Attorney’s Email: Phone:

Attorney's Address:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that | have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the day of , 20

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:

3. Telephone Number:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

6. lam employed by:

2. Address:

4. Date of Birth:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

My employer's address is:

My employer’s phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $

SSI $

Retirement $

Disability $

Unemployment $

Worker's Comp.$

Other $

LB-1108 (REV 11/15)

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

per month

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

beginning

RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: }

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that | am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.